Sad day, such a good man and now two kid and a wife will have to move on with out him.

I feel bad for his family. As far as the man himself goes... Nothing of value was lost.

“It’s worth it. I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.” — Charlie Kirk

A true man of his words, dying for what he believed in, protecting the Second amendment.

R.I.P

As much as some people hated the man for his political views, he made great points and the biggest was about the ability to have open conversation with opposing views and he nailed it when he stated that when communication breaks down it is a really bad thing.

Charlie Kirk on the dangers of communication breakdown
Preventing political violence: In a quote that resurfaced after his death, Kirk asserted that "When you stop having a human connection with someone you disagree with, it becomes a lot easier to want to commit violence against that group". The sentiment has been invoked to discuss the state of American political discourse and the escalation of rhetorical tensions.

A "civil war" of words: In the same quote, Kirk stated that when "civilization stops talking, civil war ensues". This perspective casts failures in dialogue and mutual understanding as a direct path toward societal collapse.

Relationship and community decay: Kirk expanded his communication breakdown theory beyond politics to other social structures, saying, "When marriages stop talking, divorce happens". This demonstrated his view that communication is fundamental to preventing the decay of all relationships and communities.
Inspiring debate: His "Prove Me Wrong" campus events were a direct application of his belief in the importance of direct dialogue, even with those who disagreed with him. He held these events to engage students and challenge viewpoints openly.

Now it is acceptable to kill another person for expressing there view. Look at the amount of people that think it is a good thing he was killed. I respected his views and how he went about educating others. Seems to be a lot of good job openings now

It’s absolutely not okay to kill another person, whether it’s Charlie Kirk, or children and teenagers (of which guns are the leading cause of death in the US) while they are attending school. I look forward to seeing some gun control measures being implemented in the US to combat this problem.

America is clearly headed for a civil war. Down the road this will be studied by historians as a flash point no doubt.

From the famous words of Wu Tang Clan: Ya Gotta Protect Ya Neck

I didn't agree with anything he had to see. But I feel bad for his kids for losing their dad so young and for his wife for losing her husband so quickly when they had so much life together left to live. But my sympathy ends there.

Same

Edit: I better not even say anything. Most of you know where I stand.

But one of these days one of these lunatics are going to miss and hit me. Police are often hired part time for these events. I’ve done many. So…. Ummm. Rather than ask slagpit to ban me, I’ll stop there.

A lot of people disturbingly saying he deserved what he got because of that quote but its a completely rational conversation to have. Like most rights, there are positive and negative consequences. The negatives to say the right to drive a vehicle are that we have car crashes and people die. Most agree that the positives of the freedom to drive outweigh the negatives of crash deaths. Doesn't mean they are saying they don't care about crash victims. What if crash deaths were 10x what they are now? We'd want to discuss whether the right to drive a vehicle needs to be curtailed. What numbers of deaths is the tipping point? It's a rational conversation. Similarly, at what point do the negative consequences outweigh the positives to the second amendment? If 1 person were killed each year by gun violence, is that enough to overturn the 2nd amendment? Current levels of gun violence? 10x our current level? Clearly Charlie Kirk believed that the positives outweigh the negatives and I'm sure he would still think that. He would also believe that the negatives are tragic and terrible. Its the right way to frame the debate IMO. Personally, I don't think the positives outweigh the negatives and gun ownership should be severely curtailed. Doesn't mean he deserved to die for his opinion.

What he said. That way I stay out of trouble. I’ll go with Klown and paladins comments out of respect.

I didn’t agree with everything he said. But did with a lot of it.

Big 2A supporter. Big 1A supported. Big let’s obey the laws.

What I did admire is he had public discussions. Opposing view? No problem. Let’s talk. Reasonably. Have an actual dialogue.

Something many politicians won’t or can’t do but should.

That takes courage. You are never going to know the outcome. Cannot determine a winner. But just talking it out brings thoughts. Ideas.

This whole political violence thing is out of hand. Vulnerable impressionable people read the rhetoric and think they will be hero’s.

Needs to stop. All sides.

BigDogCWG
Clowns with Guns
Political Commentator

what changed after the 70s or 80s, way more shootings now than then. IMO a lot of what we see is gang and drug related. as for the other shooting that grab headlines like, Charlie Kirk or school shootings. Those are a very few of the actual shootings but grab everyone heart strings, I really think way more should be done with Mental health. In this state Indiana it is really hard to get any meaningful treatment.

Well said. I agree 100%

All of the youth have a little computer in their pocket now that has bad actors trying to hype them up to do crazy stuff like this. Bots, extremists, foreign intelligence agencies, you name it and they are out there. You see this stuff constantly where they try and guide the vulnerable youth to do crazy stuff. All of the youth are on these online chat groups that are like discord and telegram etc. A lot of these recent cases they have been part of these groups.


Russian, Chinese Bots Fueling Online ‘Violence’ After Charlie Kirk Death

https://www.msn.com/...ie-kirk-death/ar-AA1MoPng

Proverbs 1:11