don't really want to split existing servers until we get a much much larger playerbase

So this is a jet/turret, SS/PS and spy/military spy/market spy server?

If you take away war, then you take away all the things needed for war. Little things such as troops, tanks, jets, and turrets. If you interpret spy ops as indicators of warfare, then you take those away as well.

As well as all the technologies needed to make warfare easier. Warfare, military, weapons, spy (if applicable), MStrat, and SDI. Take all those away too.



Not much of a 'netting' server then, is it?

So this is an all-ex server where the only interaction is through the market?

everybody would have to TMBR finish as there would be no military as there'd be no need for commies.....

so it'd be all-x rep farmer/casher/techer -> TMBR

I'm 500% sure that we had this discussion few months ago.

if no1 can't attack then no1 would run commies cause no1 would buy mil until near end of set and then from priv.

strats would be what qz said except farmers might run as demo and techers as theo.

dunno who would run techer if only techs get saold are busi, resi, agri and military.

oy - we could just name it the theo/casher server, as that's about the only strat that I could see standing a chance at a top 10 finish with the way removing war would cripple all the other strats out there.

we did have this discussion several months ago

and enshula's advice was

play express

splitting up netting and warring into different servers is the worst, stupidest, dumbest most idiotic idea i've ever heard.

besides I think no1 can can have that big priv. market that he/she can spend his/her bushels stock at there.

bushels stocks would be over 2b so 2b*39=78000000000 and added 2b what player has in hand makes more money than I want to count.