Aug 2nd 2021, 3:38:03
as if you randomly watched a math video :P
Also, why do we need to argue about it? its a basic proven proof, the issue is that they haven't found a counter to prove it, so therefore are unable to quantify a full mathematical proof.
We probably never will be able to unless a computer is tasked with actually number crunching a lot higher and higher numbers, but its unlikely to ever happen unless we get some freaky alien tech because all processors are limited by the amount of data they can interpret.
At work we teach this to First year Mathematics students as how NOT to prove a proof. But this only works for the Positive Set Z, and Negative numbers yields many solutions which will result in a circular references. Complex numbers has been proven to have infinite solutions to this problem but then they aren't real, and have been used many times to disprove many theories in the past.
EE Patron