Verified:

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5055

Feb 12th 2011, 17:00:50

Of course it's the same. Warring tags run whatever countries they feel will work best. They almost always run countries with low land. Warrers think they don't get grabbed because of their amazing defense, but the truth is they don't get grabbed because they keep such low land. I don't see any warring tags deliberately choosing a worse strategy just so others can grab them and be happy?

Why would you expect netters to not put their best countries in DR? They should make their countries vulnerable just so you can grab them? Or self farming itself is somehow wrong? Who should they grab then?

The FFA community believes that farming untags is wrong.
The FFA community believes that farming one man tags is wrong.

Max DR means that a SS will get 10% of the normal returns. So a 7k country hitting a 200k max dr country is exactly like a 7k country hitting a 20k country. You don't think that the 7k country will benefit under 1:1? Really?

Then how would you expect netters (who almost always have more land than warrers) to benefit by grabbing warrers? If you can't even make it work when you have 1/3rd of your target's land, try making it work when you have 150% of their land!

I don't accept your argument about self farming players. If that was actually the case then people like DeDLySMuRF wouldn't have to manufacture a war just by FSing an alliance that they picked out of a hat. Conflict between alliances would naturally happen on its own.

If you guys only accept players who think exactly like you do then FFA is going to shrink. I have a reason to be invested in the game and I keep shaking my head at some of the stuff posted here. Do you really think that new players who have no reason to be invested will want to put up with it?

Edited By: Slagpit on Feb 12th 2011, 17:39:00
Back To Thread
See Subsequent Edit