Mar 1st 2012, 2:43:34
I've thought about this today.
The thing is that SOLs fundamental statement is correct, and LaF is bad at math. I'll use the reference points I know.
LCN started in November 98. That puts LCN in their 73rd set right now. I absolutely buy that it is SOLs 75th set. LCN came in 2 sets after the great HAN war, and SOL fought in the HAN war as an alliance in UCN.
75 sets seems dead on. I know for a fact that SOL existed inside UCN in July 98, which was 75 set. That's 75 sets minimum in the alliance game. if you count the random games, SOL is older than 75 sets.
If LaF is stating that they are in set 72, then LaF is wrong and bad at math. That would make them younger than LCN, and that is not the case.
I wouldn't be surprised if LaF was in it's 82nd set, but it's not their 72nd.
The thing is that SOLs fundamental statement is correct, and LaF is bad at math. I'll use the reference points I know.
LCN started in November 98. That puts LCN in their 73rd set right now. I absolutely buy that it is SOLs 75th set. LCN came in 2 sets after the great HAN war, and SOL fought in the HAN war as an alliance in UCN.
75 sets seems dead on. I know for a fact that SOL existed inside UCN in July 98, which was 75 set. That's 75 sets minimum in the alliance game. if you count the random games, SOL is older than 75 sets.
If LaF is stating that they are in set 72, then LaF is wrong and bad at math. That would make them younger than LCN, and that is not the case.
I wouldn't be surprised if LaF was in it's 82nd set, but it's not their 72nd.