Nov 9th 2012, 9:05:31
Originally posted by Alin:
There is no real reason to give 7 life sentence + 140 years. That might be the USA law sistem ( which probably is the best one in the world) - but i see no sense in giving 7 life sentence ( 1 is enough - 1 life sentence = your life ).
+140 years to that - wtf ?
I think there should be death sentence for this type of murders - but as i could read in the Yahoo article this guy was seriously brain damaged ... Maybe his place was not in the street for a long time.
+140 years to that - wtf ?
I think there should be death sentence for this type of murders - but as i could read in the Yahoo article this guy was seriously brain damaged ... Maybe his place was not in the street for a long time.
My reply should show that our legal system is retarded.
A life sentence alone rarely means until they die. I think they have to do 15-20 years of it, but then can be paroled or other things can let them get out early.
Also I am not real sure who did what or if the death sentence was on the table, but most states don't allow the death penalty. However I would guess that this was done at the federal level which means it was on the table. Anyhow, yes this probably would have been death if not for him being disturbed.
I am just glad he actually got prison time as I thought all along this was going to be mental defect.