Jul 24th 2010, 20:55:05
Desperado, where do you see me saying delete an entire clan? What an idiotic statement to make!...
Read again, I was referring to Pangaea's forgiving the cheaters in LAE. Whether it was 3 or 4 members, I don't give a rats bum. If they cheat, they should be gone! So let me rephrase my script for your coconut. If this were a no name alliance with 10 members running 15 countries each and 4 of them were caught doing what the few did in LAE, they'd be toast, end of story, no chance of reinstatement whatsoever. That is what I was saying so quit reading more into what I wrote in any attempt to undermine my wording...
The real issue here is that LAE has the numbers in membership since day one of EE and Pangaea doesn't want to hurt those stats. He forgave those people that were found to have cheated for the obvious reason. Bad choice of things to do, when now, everyone knows what went on in my opinion...
The next time there are cheaters found in any alliance, I would be very interested in seeing how Pangaea deals the cards on that event or are we writing the one chance rule?. In reality, that is what Pangaea has now done to the so called, "cardinal rule"...
mrford, this is not old fluff and I am entitled to a voice on the matter as I choose. You sir do not dictate who can or cannot write on issues. This is well worth rubbing in the faces of our cheaters who continue to be potentially harmful to the future existance of this game. It doesn't matter that the mods keep them under the radar. In that regard, wasn't DM a part of Pangaea's internal staffing? Pangaea was quick to take the blame on that. I'm speculating, but it is also fair to say that all of us could have had our personal information accessed, especially when you could possibly have a rogue underpaid employee working behind the scenes...
Pangaea??
Read again, I was referring to Pangaea's forgiving the cheaters in LAE. Whether it was 3 or 4 members, I don't give a rats bum. If they cheat, they should be gone! So let me rephrase my script for your coconut. If this were a no name alliance with 10 members running 15 countries each and 4 of them were caught doing what the few did in LAE, they'd be toast, end of story, no chance of reinstatement whatsoever. That is what I was saying so quit reading more into what I wrote in any attempt to undermine my wording...
The real issue here is that LAE has the numbers in membership since day one of EE and Pangaea doesn't want to hurt those stats. He forgave those people that were found to have cheated for the obvious reason. Bad choice of things to do, when now, everyone knows what went on in my opinion...
The next time there are cheaters found in any alliance, I would be very interested in seeing how Pangaea deals the cards on that event or are we writing the one chance rule?. In reality, that is what Pangaea has now done to the so called, "cardinal rule"...
mrford, this is not old fluff and I am entitled to a voice on the matter as I choose. You sir do not dictate who can or cannot write on issues. This is well worth rubbing in the faces of our cheaters who continue to be potentially harmful to the future existance of this game. It doesn't matter that the mods keep them under the radar. In that regard, wasn't DM a part of Pangaea's internal staffing? Pangaea was quick to take the blame on that. I'm speculating, but it is also fair to say that all of us could have had our personal information accessed, especially when you could possibly have a rogue underpaid employee working behind the scenes...
Pangaea??