Verified:

BP Game profile

Member
89

Aug 29th 2010, 6:25:25

I was only DoL :)
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Aug 15th 2010, 22:39:06

An old corpse is still old even if it died young :p
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Aug 15th 2010, 15:54:32

I have no real interest in the inner workings of LaE :)
I do find it amusing that LaE claims none of the cheat-leaders are in a position of power any more, and goes great lengths to argue that as a fact, yet DM makes poorly veiled threats in the name of LaE, and Thunder comments that wars have been started by insults between clan-leaders.
It's all on the boards, so evidently you do feel a need to have your actions reviewed by others, and should not complain when someone points out the discrepancy between your claims and actions.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Aug 14th 2010, 21:39:10

NOW3P, take a look at behaviour and posting, and it seems rather evident that DM care a lot about being regarded as a hot-shot.

Thunder, while true, I'm not a leader... and DM in several other threads regarding the cheating in LaE claims he no longer hold any such position.
Add two and two together, and we suddenly end up with nine as a result when taking the threats made into consideration.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Aug 14th 2010, 19:11:50

Originally posted by Some Guy:
How is he still allowed to screw stuff up and be a cumstain around here?

Same reason you are, the all-embracing love of Pangea :p
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Aug 14th 2010, 19:10:01

Originally posted by DM:
I suggest you clarify your affiliations with PANLV


Would be very hard to get PANLV on Patel's servers into anything, but I'll humour you.
I was I was the founder of a small clan of Swedes, who merged with the Danish Vikings under dalamar to form The Last Vikings, which later merged with Pandora's Hellraisers to become Pandora's Last Vikings.
Already back then, you were ambitious, nagging for titles and ready to take rather...questionable shortcuts to reach positions.

Originally posted by DM:
I've learn alot sweetheart./.../If you're holding on to someone from that long ago

The interesting part isn't your little hacking stunt though, but the reasons behind it.
I saw you then as an insecure little boy, so uncertain of yourself that you needed attention and "status" (a fallacy big as any. The ones who were regarded with real respect got it from taking who they were into the game, rather than letting the game define who they are) to confirm your worth of self.

So what have you learned? Oh, you have a broader and deeper skill-set, but in the end, you still desperately try to become SOMEONE in the eyes of others rather than grow to become good enough in yourself.
Your arrogance (which is even more malplaced than Eric's when he was leading IMP) is just a thin varnish worn for cover, and just as transparent.

While you by now probably think I harbour resentment towards you for things long gone forgotten by most, that isn't the case.
I do regard your attitude and actions with the same contempt, since they are not worth anything better, but for you as a person I above all feel pity. Like Jesus said: "hate the sin, not the sinner."
(That does extend to the homo-erotical affectional you addressed me by)

Originally posted by DM:
you deserve the frustrations I cause you over the net.
getting the current PANLV into a situation they don't want to be in


This brings us to the business-end, of it all, doesn't it?
First of all, you cannot cause me any frustrations at all on-line.
(Legally, I should add. Then again, I wouldn't count on any judge to agree that such methods were justified if it comes to that).

More interesting though, is that you state that the current tag PANLV could be targeted for a strictly personal exchange of words between the two of us.
I happen to recall you posting "proof" of you no longer being a leader in LaE, without positions or direct influence.
Your threat however suggests otherwise.
Now, before you reply in any manner, you should think very hard on which path you want to walk.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Aug 14th 2010, 13:22:59

Originally posted by mrford:
if you really do have evidence that lae is cheating, please take it to the mods, but we arnt, so you won't


Osiris/Dark Morbid/DM is playing in LaE.
Since he obviously hasn't learned anything since the time he got booted from PANLV about a decade ago, I doubt he will ever.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Aug 5th 2010, 23:17:44

Prim has been told ever since he started to play... just don't seem to get through :-/
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 17th 2010, 0:28:07

Mission Impossible with Phelps receiving orders?

£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 16th 2010, 22:32:23

Everybody complaining about running countries take too much time miss the point entirely.
The number of countries is what makes FFA different from the other servers.
Like stated above, a high countrylimit forces a new factor into the strategies: time-consumption and efficiency of taking turns rather than most efficient way to spend said turn.

A low country-limit simply makes FFA a slightly expanded 1a rather than an environment in it's own right.
In fact, lowering the limit (as suggested in another thread) would be the sure demise of the game.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 15th 2010, 1:59:51

Gazza, I'm not speaking as a member of PANLV, but a FFA-player.

Hence I once again ask you, do you, should you decide to stay in FFA, intend to bring 1A policies to this server?

Edited By: BP on Jul 15th 2010, 17:07:55
See Original Post
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 15th 2010, 1:36:58

Hey, we aren't in Almedalen now :p
Get the leaf away from your mouth and answer the simple question if you intend to pursue 1A policies on the FFA-server should you chose to remain on the server.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 15th 2010, 1:08:11

So, if you get some pacts, you will not try to impose L:L and other foreign policies at all?
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 15th 2010, 0:06:01

Tänker ni fortsätta med att försöka få in 1A-systemet här?
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 11th 2010, 23:57:43

Originally posted by azmodii:

Need is the mother of all necessity. At the moment, you CAN run 16 countries without a bot, hence minimal need for one. Running 32? Double time consumption = More need for a bot = Someone actually taking the time to code one.
mit.


That is what set the difference between the old FFA and the rest of the servers, and the reason all the 1A clans who came in failed.
With a high limit, the time spent becomes a resource just as vital as CS-count etc when deciding on the strategy. 20 decently run countries will beat 1 perfectly managed.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 11th 2010, 22:49:58

LoL, had nothing better to do :)

Figured that you'd either had to waste some turns killing ACME PestControl, or start buying tanks OOP.
Either way, someone will get annoyed :p
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 11th 2010, 22:44:17

50-60
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 9th 2010, 21:58:51

True... kind of annoying seeing a country go up 2,5M in NW from FA from countries you aren't to hit due to pacts :p
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 9th 2010, 21:15:34

Don't mind a challenge, don't think actively and consequently saving countries during KRs are well seen though.
Frankly, I wouldn't protest against any such countries being placed on the targetlist.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 4th 2010, 2:53:47

Originally posted by Thunder:
War! Good God HUH! what is it good for...


~ Killing loads of countries! Hoah! ~
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 3rd 2010, 17:16:27

Has IMP pulled their countries out of SOTA yet?
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jul 1st 2010, 18:10:12

Originally posted by m0bzta:
SOTA will be merging in to SWORDS


Will IMP's countries tag along in the merger?
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 27th 2010, 1:06:32

Well, there do be some familiar faces around here...least if you're the one I remember :)

In case you want them horns back:
http://www.boxcarhosting.com/...ication.php?clanID=PLVxTC


Edited By: BP on Jun 27th 2010, 1:09:13
See Original Post
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 26th 2010, 4:19:02

Killing snotty and clickish 1a people?

Sure thing :)
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 26th 2010, 4:17:03

Non-idiot... check!
Veteran... check!
Sucky.. check!
Unable to gain NW if life depends on it... check!
Not giving a damn about fancy titles... check!

So, where do I sign up?
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 25th 2010, 20:18:20

Originally posted by Akula:
*passes llaar a cool, refreshing bear* :D


Polar bear obviously!
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 25th 2010, 0:34:15

More likely Dragon showing RD what controlling the market means....
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 24th 2010, 23:59:34

Turrets down to 135 from over 170 in less than a day, no jets to be found, and oil going up over 900???!
Some of us are trying to wage a war here :p
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 24th 2010, 7:02:06

What??!?!
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 21st 2010, 20:08:47

Until now, the only clan I know of that has a LG:kill-policy is RD, and hence I'd like to know what colour you are.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 21st 2010, 18:44:27

Originally posted by Rico:
Three hits too many.


Out of curiosity, what colour are you?
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 21st 2010, 17:22:10

Originally posted by Rico:
We already had plans in place to go after PANLV when I contacted Ivan. An enemy of our enemy, it made sense for us to work together.


Just have to ask, how did PANLV become IMP's enemy?
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 21st 2010, 2:34:27

That is actually good... you KNOW you won't be trolling your news for some lone suicider to kill ;)
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 21st 2010, 2:26:46

Piss-poor strategy, you mean lol

And just to make things perfectly clear, it's me who had a bit of unfinished business with LaE before getting distracted by other events, not PANLV, as I was not tagged or even signed up for the clan-site.

And like the saying goes "What happens outside the tag, stays outside the tag" ;)
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 21st 2010, 1:20:59

Speaking just for myself, I'd join ESD at the blink of an eye should that happen.
Heck, I'd join IMP just as fast if it got to war contesting L:L-policies.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 21st 2010, 1:16:29

Originally posted by RaHL_DK:

Set - 3 IMP, With the Restarts that are Sof DoW on Panlv, a clan with more members and higher Net ....


Just for the record, most of SoF were NOT restarts, but coming out from vacation where they had been hiding ever since Ivan thought it was a good idea to enforce land:land retals.

No point trying to detract that IMP made a well coordinated FS and the war all but done when FoCuS joined in.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 21st 2010, 1:08:33

Joebot! :D
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 20th 2010, 21:29:26

Same formula used as for tech-alliances?
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 20th 2010, 20:34:37

If I was only to plough a couple of furrows, I see no need to get a tractor :p
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 20th 2010, 17:25:23

I agree... killing Primmy is ALWAYS a good thing.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 20th 2010, 15:55:04

Who is running the Simpson-string, Rico?
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 20th 2010, 15:53:45

Hehehe, fann det lite ironiskt att IMP hoppade in när jag just dödat ditt sista land :)
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 20th 2010, 15:30:25

Why pay more than you have to? :p
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 20th 2010, 15:29:04

Ivan, ni är inte anpassade för överlevnad :p
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 20th 2010, 2:19:01

Homer
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 19th 2010, 23:38:53

No use having them jump in really.
PANLV had their asses handed to them by the combined efforts of IMP and SoF.
Only positive to be said is that they killed every hittable SoF before IMP declared.
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 19th 2010, 2:12:59

Naw, PANLV is all but ready to get mopped up with half the team gone over the weekend.

Oh well, there will be other wars :)
£-€

BP Game profile

Member
89

Jun 18th 2010, 23:49:02

1.2M spies on 800ish acres makes a tough target to spy on ;)
£-€