Verified:

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Aug 2nd 2021, 2:12:14

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Jul 25th 2021, 15:38:10

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Jul 11th 2021, 16:36:14

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Jun 23rd 2021, 3:55:09

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Jun 14th 2021, 4:00:30

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Jun 1st 2021, 1:53:51

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

May 29th 2021, 1:12:49

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

May 3rd 2021, 3:34:57

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Apr 26th 2021, 4:10:47

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Apr 19th 2021, 3:26:25

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

May 26th 2020, 3:54:22

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

May 18th 2020, 4:50:24

I know you do this for the luls, but I know a great psychiatrist if you need to talk about your feelings.

Badde Game profile

Member
219

May 18th 2020, 4:46:28

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

May 11th 2020, 3:19:33

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

May 4th 2020, 16:10:27

I tried understanding the post in the link, but they are all talking about the proxy question, not the real issue.

If it is an unlawful law, then I am sure it will be overwritten once the political process starts again.
If it is lawful, I don't understand what the problem is.
If you just hate the "liberals" then say that, instead of this roundabout criticism.


For heavens sake, exercise your political duty and change the fluffing system if you are unhappy with it.


The new regulation gives owners 2 years to become compliant, they just can't buy new ones, or use their items from now, and after the two years they can apply to have their items "grandfathered" back to them.

Badde Game profile

Member
219

May 4th 2020, 16:00:31

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Apr 28th 2020, 18:11:14

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Jan 25th 2020, 15:41:56

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Jan 13th 2020, 2:42:09

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Jan 6th 2020, 16:14:22

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Jan 4th 2020, 3:05:29

We are all bad fish, or we all wish we were bad fish

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Dec 30th 2019, 2:23:19

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Dec 23rd 2019, 21:56:33

'murican politics are laughable, there seems to only ever be two sides.

Heaven forbid you take a nuanced look at things.

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Dec 16th 2019, 17:04:52

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Dec 9th 2019, 5:49:31

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Dec 3rd 2019, 0:30:35

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Nov 25th 2019, 16:06:50

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Nov 18th 2019, 19:24:41

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Nov 11th 2019, 15:28:34

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Nov 4th 2019, 22:02:58

Also, thank you, Derrick, that means a lot.

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Nov 4th 2019, 22:00:02

Originally posted by Gerdler:
Badde which alliance are you in? Which suicider is this referring to?


Any and all that are on the alliance server, running untags for the sole purpose of attempting to grief people.

As for other servers, I don't play there, so I am not sure how my definition would apply there.

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Nov 4th 2019, 21:57:06

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Nov 3rd 2019, 0:25:59

Sorry, I was quoting the other Cider guy

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Nov 2nd 2019, 20:20:43

Originally posted by Sued Cider:
Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
What's a scicider?????


Joe Sixpack spelling of suicider.

It should be noted that it's not actually possible to ruin somebody's set. It's only possible to make it more interesting. Might be possible to smash a few unrealistic expectations about what a good set is supposed to be though.


...I am deeply concerned for you still, hiding behind an alias. My offer to help you find a professional in mental health still stands, if you want to get better.


On a side note, how do you know what will ruin someone else's set?
You know that other people are other people, right? With their own thoughts and feelings?

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Nov 2nd 2019, 15:34:15

To me, a suicider is someone who runs an untagged country with the sole purpose of ruining someone else's set.

To me, this signifies a severe mental health condition, and I am willing to help you find some support. I do want you go get proper care, so you can live a fulfilling life on your own.

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Nov 2nd 2019, 4:16:43

Originally posted by UgolinoII:
Originally posted by Badde:
Tie accounts to devices MAC addresses, and permaban the MAC address.


oh my sweet summer child...


Hey now, no need to be condescending just because I am not tech savvy.

You could just have said it wouldn't work?

Like Marshal did.

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Oct 30th 2019, 19:31:24

Tie accounts to devices MAC addresses, and permaban the MAC address.

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Oct 30th 2019, 2:43:56

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Oct 23rd 2019, 1:30:01

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Oct 2nd 2019, 14:29:50

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Sep 24th 2019, 1:09:19

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Sep 19th 2019, 16:51:02

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Sep 14th 2019, 4:56:40

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Sep 3rd 2019, 16:58:31

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Aug 26th 2019, 15:38:06

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Aug 20th 2019, 22:16:11

Good point.

Would making spy ops more reliant on having the same level of resources feel good? Like one would have to be within 70% or so for decent returns, and have sharp declining returns for being too small?

I don't remember where the the limit is today.

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Aug 20th 2019, 18:16:48

Originally posted by DerrickICN:
Either way boltar it shouldnt be incentivized to run a country with 5k acres and 1m spies OVER running a country with 50k acres and 9m spies.

You have less cash expense, less food expense, cheaper production cost to maintain, lower spy losses on failed ops, fewer buildings required to produce spal thereby lowering cost, and a better spy power.

That's clearly not balanced in the most remote sense. It literally incentivizes having a bad country. If you needed something like 4 or 5m spies on 5k acres, you'd merely be hitting the same production walls as the larger country does, and not just be able to easily steal tech from bots to maintain an absurd spal. While that's easy peasy on 5k acres, on 50k acres same spal you get the same amount of tech per op but on higher expenses. It should be just as difficult to maintain spies on low acres as high acres and the fact that it isn't is a problem. Sin's rendition of Ugo's formula is spot on for a remedy to balance the cost of being low acres high spal.

I also don't think something that makes good players better at war and bad players worse at war degrades the war experience at all. This is absolutely not a case of something just to make war more difficult or something. It just means you will have a better chance of winning wars and distancing yourself if you are good at the game. And you should have to also be good to take down good players.

I would prefer spies*acres^(-1/3) for spy power, and spy drs to go into effect after 10 of any single op type, while CDs remain equal in power. The number of total ops before dr could remain the same tho.



I know this will mess with oildestockmumbojumbothings, but what if you drop land, you also loose that % amount of troops/spies/resources as well?
This effectively removes the 5k acres uberspy?

Trying to war stock with a 5k acre country is quite ineffective. One would come in to the war with little or no stock, and one would never be able to afford the amounts of troops needed to effectively CD a 20-30M troop country.


Sidenote, anyone sitting on 10M troops in a well stocked war, or at 50k acres, is asking to get killed, y0 :P

Edited By: Badde on Aug 20th 2019, 18:20:48. Reason: clarification/expansion
See Original Post

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Aug 20th 2019, 17:48:46

13

Badde Game profile

Member
219

Aug 16th 2019, 14:50:23

13