As far as it being a wargame and me needing to defend my acres goes tho, when you killed me the set before you helped chevs suicide me, I had 30m jet breaks over 20m troops and 2m tanks. I wasnt "under defended." If someone feels like hitting you in this game, they will find a way to make it work. Your military is only a deterrent, but one that can be easily overcome in most situations. And my mouth has always made me more worth killing than any amount of military could possibly deter.

If you're looking to like gain nw off of me or something, for sure I'm well defended typically. I win out in exchanges. But if you want to literally spend half a set in stock to break me with 130m jets well...that's hardly me being under defended and you trying to make gains. You just wanna hit me, and that's it. Has nothing to do with defense. I've literally had 100m nw in units while netting and watched you make it work several times.

If you wanna hit me, you're gonna. And it has absolutely not fluff to do with defense. Now it seems like you are making excuses too, tho, and I think it's pretty counterintuitive. You don't need an excuse, remember?

Again I'm not. It's high key more than 5 or 6 tho. Maybe 5 or 6 in the last 6 or 7 lol. You guys even jumped up and bit me here and there while you were warring NBK for a year.

You're gonna play however you want to, clearly. I'm not trying to take that away from you brah. I just thought looking at NBK like they making the war unfair, or making up reasons that y'all hit us was funny. Has 0 to do with that and 100% just how you wanna play.

Nah two sets ago is when you helped chevs find me and suicide me. Set before was the most recent time you blindsided us netting. But I think assisting players in other spam tags aside from your own in suiciding me absolutely counts.

Trying to ruin my set at the very end last set was just icing. Are you doubting that you're around 30 or 40 sets targeting me or something? You seem confused. It might be a bit of an exaggeration without counting but it's at least close...

Oh no. You hit me every set. I dont think theres an actual reason. I just think it's funny your tag seems to want to provide one.

If there was a different, unique and legitimate reason to hit me like 30 or 40 times, that'd be kind of crazy haha.

The public market max SELL price is individual for military units and based on your private market PURCHASE price.

So it could be that you have varying MBs/Mil tech/govt leading to some countries being unable to sell as high as you want.

The max sale price is 3 x PM purchase price (not sure exactly how it rounds). But more or less if you buy troops at 120 on your private market it means your max sale price is around 360.

It could be because of this, but if you could sell manually at the same price as you tried to sell at on your FFA control panel it could be some bug.

Man every single one of you dont even have the excuse straight for hitting us. Hahaha.

KO, your clan mates are in spam tags. Sit down. You have no business talking about a fair fight. You guys have never even attempted to be about that.

Defrock, verb (past defrocked) : deprive (someone) of professional status or membership of a prestigious group

"Only after he was defrocked did the disgraced priest finally attempt to engage with the parish he had betrayed"

Just to confirm, the tag that is hitting NBKxWar, and that tag only. The rest of NBK is not involved.

No surprise. They could not win a war without overwhelming odds.

Does it still hold true on May 29th? I'll keep an eye out for it lol. What's the goal post, all in the top 100 or 1 top ten after you kill all the netters?

Also I think they used to call it wargaining not war-netting back when the expenses formula still had efficacy on the upper acreages. I remember sky deletez having winning countries back in the day wargaining. But....you know....that's because youd have the most acres, more than the netters, after a war win. War is usually just for the fun of war now. The game doesn't really reward the W. Just bragging rights and a seriously depleted stockpile haha.

I didnt say I would. I said it would be the logical thing to do if you wanted to win and said I would not be the first to do it actually. A smart netting tag would just smack the fluff out of small tags if they had any sense while preventing attacks from larger ones if the techer bots are dumping their massive missile stocks. I see clans being able to prevent attacks on themselves more and more in combination with bot interactions being increased. A sum of parts which I dislike and express my opinion on. And everyone thinks I'm an asshole because my initial response isnt GREAT JOB AWESOME CHANGE GUYS. I say when I like stuff and say when I dislike stuff. And I dislike anything that increases bot interactions period. Not into it. And I think some changes in the past have been good, but others created this super high acre, broken expense formula, no player interaction dynamic we play in on every server outside of primary. To this point, the market positives for me do not outweigh the interaction negatives, so I'm critical of most changes.

Your goal is not to finish with a higher nw tho. Dont bullfluff a bullfluffter. You dont care in the least what your nw is haha

Raz why do you hate Hawk so much.

I'm sorry, did I say something that wasn't true?

You used to be proud of the fact that you've hit someone every set for so many years or whatever.

If and I say IF - this is true because I have no idea.

wIMP should be continuously tagged killed reset after reset. We all know I have no love for LoC, but if what D said is true....this is garbage. I have no pull in NBK but I have a voice.

I think what happened to the netters in LoC is the act of group of cowards.

I believe

That is true, this is you start to get severe penalties if you have less then 20% of opponents land. This isn't the case in many wars, as if you cannot get through their defense, and you cannot get 20% of their land, you are generally not combat capable anyway. This is not a strong limiting factor however, as it only affect either small suiciders/poorly built countries, attacking very large land countries. A more normal example is a 20k acre country attacking a 70k acre country with spy ops, and that penalty would not come into great effect. Where what would be expected is the 20k's offensive SPAL should be HisSpies/70k, not his own SPAL. SPAL should only be defensive, as when is having less land, and less spies better offensively then someone who has more of both.

One other method that I would suggest to help with issues along this line, is right now, defensive ops success ratio are primarily determined by your SPAL compared to the targets SPAL (for his own land). An alternate method, which would balance many of the issues right away, is using Defenders SPAL, against the attacks SpyValue/DefendersLand. How many spies you have per acre should only apply defensively. How many spies You can put on their acres, should be the offensive value.

I have a few other thoughts, but for this this change, I really like what you propose!

If your neighbor hits one target, that is no longer as good a target, that goes for stealing cash as well. Better to find your own targets, plus it gives the mods less work...

Please keep discussion in this thread on topic. This is an important announcement for the community. Thank you.

Sorry I didn't realise I had to explain myself to you as well. Actually was leaving the current BS out of it and asking as a theoretical response..

let me give you a scenario then..

A group of players decide that they no longer want to play by any rules, and they hide untagged and pretend to be bots (non-clan so therefore no real relations can be made) then they decide to take out their issues on an unsuspecting clan and they smash a bunch of netters, either killing or maiming over half of a clan or even a few clans. The clan(s) potentially suffers loss of players, as does the game. Not just for the rest of the current reset, but once that happens a few times, players definitely stop coming back just to have their fun of the game be ruined by a bunch of players who want nothing but to hurt people with no attempt at making it a worthwhile engagement for either side.

Dictator fluff right there bro, straight outta Clinton's playbook SMH

https://youtu.be/K5Q5FhBH2MM


🤮

He only got 3 days?!?!?!

Soft

An all-X leaderboard is already planned for Express and possibly other servers.

We aren't going to add a leaderboard for sanctioned players because that could be viewed as incentive to become sanctioned. It's the same reason the countries aren't identified ingame.

One day you will welcome someone back without the jerk comments :p

Ahh yes high score duhhhh lol, but I only recall talking about DOGE...

Pfft, you're boring!

😂

I don't know what HS is....so yeah you're definitely talking to my imposter... I'm curious now, what's he/she/it saying?

You're talking to my imposter ingame...

Report back when you get one :P


















/me runs

Me