My money is on the team with SO in their name to win!

Have fun guys.

To be more clear,

Divine Revelation (#957) [Neofed] Dead

Is an original, not a restart Check its 0 hour stats, it started at 100a And got FA from Neofed only after tagging up to kill.

Regarding the other Tag jumper however you've got a bit of an argument, as for outside pacts. YOU declared war on them, with what almost twice their playerbase? Suck it up, people will defend themselves against overbearing odds. If they declared on you I'd have a different viewpoint but you FS'ed them. Tag it up with the tags that are FAing them to either get it to stop by calling it pact violations or use your expert foreign policy to get your allies to stop them. Oh wait, you have no foreign policy because you're a small fish in a big pond that doesn't understand consistency.

You should Check the tag records for 957, He wasn't a tag jumper as opposed to a recruit by neofed.

He didn't tag up elsewhere and jump he joined them to fight you, which should have been expected after your actions last reset.

I expect he'll join any tag that wants to kill DK on a whim. Assuming he doesn't mess with you on his own in boredom. Enforcing bad policies on untagged vet players is a good way to get set after set suiciders, or people who are willing to assist your enemies regardless of tag.

I dont restart in oop wars. Tis how much I love them.

ewe...

Silly oil prices.

The list is shorter (and far easier) if I list the places I haven't played....

However, to have played for a significant and notable time... Sol and Sof

Whats the tag? I need new farmland.

Makis idea is nice, if not hard to implement and needing some tweaking, I can see abuses.

Its also a decent test implementation for similar suggestions on alliance...

As for speed, using gdi as a basis( and removing its normal function) could springboard the coding. As weve already got some of the elements in the game. I could forsee with some moderation a token implementation of it while the real code was worked out.

I dont know earths internals fully mind you but yeah.

I told him he'd die before the end of the set, not exactly the way I expected mind you....

Die.

I love retal policy arguments, they are amusing.

Its a trick question, I'll give some credit to the people who picked 0, they just missed order of operation, at least they fell for the obvious misnomer of the question....

However the ones that just completely got it wrong....

15

I understand you're trying to make right for the unprovoked BR's and do appreciate the gesture.

But lets consider this for a moment; 81's BR's killed roughly 250 buildings before TSO joined in (No big deal, really) TSO destroyed what 4.5k? including a significant portion of CS. (Not to even bother calculating the loss of turrets and pop income.) The loss of actual structures reduces the amount gained on a grab too, making it neigh impossible to get rebuilt through grabbing the MIB3 tag.

All policing for me does is say, here you go #81, we'll protect your personal farm from being hit by anyone else.

Sure he's getting land shuffled from the rest of his team as opposed to just free land, but protecting from new threats doesn't replace the income or growth ability destroyed. And in all realty prevents me from having an excuse to hit others, as it stands without MIB3's ability to grab me removed, AND time to rebuild: #81 will profit and his team mates will suffer...

And the entire point of this entire exercise is #81 RoRing...

I find the best option to being left alone, is prove that you should be left alone, and to make anyone who doesn't believe you suffer for it.

And in return your players will cry about how thier sets are ruined because of someone elses actions.

I do like my inbox at current.

*shrug* #81 felt like being pushy because he was big. Only reason he was able to triple tap (RoR's mind you) me to begin with was because I bought jets to retal #53, to whom I took two retals and messaged him that I wouldn't be taking anymore because I'd made my point.

Just because someone is untagged doesn't mean you can push them around. Performing harmful ops, RoRing (3x) and messaging that you want to make the player your farm, is a damn good reason to have "war" declared on you. Which is exactly what I did.... If it wasn't for TSO BRing me for no reason (another matter all together) I would be in better shape than before 81 hit me.

Now assuming MIB3 is actually MIB, I give them props for keeping their tags actions separate, however if MIB3 isn't actually MIB ...

Picking on untaggeds is a good way to get suiciders, what the nubcakes that AB suicided on TSO (getting AB'ed early slows you down sure, but in the end doesn't stop a good finish, just look at LaF in the old days when they got AB'ed almost every reset....) don't seem to understand however is that, ABing to just die is a waste of time. I'll only AB once I reach the point that I can't grab their land (and bushels) anymore (thanks #21).

Particularly on a server where the spirit of the server is Max of 5 players, Untagged are quite simply just a small tag and should be treated the same way. If you can't handle being retaled then don't land grab.

I'm very reasonable, instead of continuing to rape #53's land I hurt him (mostly because he did what 5 hits?) and messaged him. I didn't missile, I didn't AB. I didn't do anything Any Tag wouldn't have done. 81 decided to push, I pushed back.

81 is liable to die before the end of the set anyway, notice he's farming iScode? I mean really, its Imagnum all they do is kill stuff.... Its what they find fun in this game, why would you give them a reason to kill you?

As it stands right now, people have choices to be made. Because here's how I'm going to react;

Until I'm completely rebuilt, I will do my best to Retal Country:Country however if I am unable to do that I will get my land back by retaling in some variation of country:tag. Don't like it? Then don't hit me, or kill me. Once I'm rebuilt I'll return to normal Country:Country as the only option.

I'm going to continue hitting 26/10/21 until I'm satisfied they're dead or I'm dead.

Its that simple, I won't be pushed around. You want to push me around I'll bite back, in whatever way I need to (or can). I'm not unreasonable and I don't do things unprovoked. I'm just here to play the game, and although I'm untagged I play by the same code tags do (except that unfortunately solo kills are nigh impossible so "war" consists of landgrabs AB's and BR's to taste)

81 started it, and his tag is either going to have to finish it, actually attempt to make the peace, or wait until I get bored.

The bunny carries the cookies on its head.

Then give me all the cookies, and the Bunny!

I will not be you or anyone else's farm, Can't handle being retaled? Then don't make hits.

Offensive spy ops + RoR's?
I might not be able to farm one of your countries, But I will farm the others.

Feel free to kill me, I'll just repeat the process until I'm satisfied with the results. I don't mind carrying it into other resets or farming any of your unspirited tags.

Don't think I'll be like the others and just AB you and expect to die, because I won't.

Big fatties should stop grabbing me in such ways that I get 150-200% L:L back before ghosties....

*shrug* he wants CAD, them things are worth pennies...

even if failed didn't... 1 troop GS successes don't hurt you much either....

fluff why do I give up my secretz.

Not yet! Just wait for it....

I'd say make a more applicable implementation of the declare war function, either on an alliance level or a country level.

wrong button

2012-06-28 05:40 I forgot how to internet (#562) [DKnights] Last set sucked (#522) [LCNostra] PS Defended
2012-06-27 20:14 Last set sucked (#522) [LCNostra] I forgot how to internet (#562) [DKnights] PS 2,854A (+1,306A)

----------

Let me guess;
- Someone hit Xelah, and made a profit on Xelah's inability to retal. Now Xelah is demanding L:L retals (which are voided by DH's usually anyway).

Sounds vaguely familiar.

That would mean they get to see her b00b135 no? isn't that a win?

Id kill na over that response...

Hardly, you should research the major political ideals some more. And what different words within a political rhetoric mean.

You should reread the op; I stated as a fact that the team server is intended for 5 man teams. I also stated for a fact that the teams are actually clusters of "small teams" working in tandem, so basically just alliances of 1a only smaller and forced across multiple tags making the purpose of the 5 man team cap moot....

And I asked for someone to explain why. The best answer is thus far kumanders

lulz, referring to the fact that DKnights is attempting to kill 153 because 153 refused to accept L:L from them, and threatened to farm their land back off of any DK player necessary if they tried to enforce it?

Calling them the big bad bully.

This still amuses me.

You misssed the point. Try again.

So the point of team is to have smaller groups (5...) Yet its pretty obvious that the groups are just one big group split over multiple teams, someone care to explain? Or is it just the classic we make a million ally chainage.

And its not dead...

That country may not be Murf, but you did upset murf with your actions.

I'll be amused to see if you actually manage to kill it...

120 turns on a two turn gov = 60 attacks... Sure your readiness drops but not so low to prevent you from attacking.

I agree, but one country is hard pressed to kill another

I didn't read most of the thread, but isn't this the same situation LaF put other clans in without even numbers?

RD is fighting :-p

I'll take whoever Imag doesn't kill.

Evo vs LaF...

I've never seen any of the information regarding Evo as I was away. that said however;

Credit goes to one who notices their faults (cheating) admits their faults and attempts to move past it, as opposed to those who have their faults pointed out to them, then refuse to fess up and move past.

In regards to cheating there's a lot of accusations going around 10mil troops for instance, the end all be all is however that TC/hanlong where caught and still claim they did nothing wrong... regardless of what they actually did/didn't do.

The attack again button is no faster than the good ole f5 enter. Its just more convient (and with the new js attack page f5 enter doesnt work).

The speed of attacks comes more from not having to worry about losses. Put a higher % of mil killed on the attackers side, and increase the effect of medical tech and this will change.

Your post, is a thinly veiled threat.

A warning sure, but a threat none the less.

Stupid phone.

If I was imag, id kill supernova on principle. His post is a threat. Threats deserve repricusions.

http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/...78039776_1160655994_n.jpg

discuss.

I'm scared to click the link.