Search For Author: Jiman - Earth Empires Forum

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 21st 2017, 0:40:49

Dooo Eeeeeet!!!

I will only accept App powa to play Earth again! ><

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 16th 2017, 19:25:52

Honestly. I am very very surpised that no one has yet tried to brand Earth 2025 to Mobile users.

Earth seems to rely on very simple code and very simple easy to understand concepts. There should be very little issue porting this to mobile.

Why does that matter? People age. Many can not sit at a computer to play the simple games they once did in the past. Simple games can be played on mobile devices. Also, if you wanted to be evil you could include limited and evil Micro transactions.

If that was the cost of breathing some life back into this game, geeze, I think id accept that.

I wish I could play like I used too... but now? I have too many things to do.

Pangy, get to work!

(maps)

Jiman

Member
1199

Mar 8th 2015, 2:22:00

THINGS A GONNA DIE PEWPEWPEW

Jiman

Member
1199

Sep 21st 2013, 16:39:49

Sol is ranked too high.

Laf is ranked too low.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 12th 2013, 15:14:45

Suni needs to get her whips out!!!

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 12th 2013, 15:12:53

Pew pew.

Now a days, wars that maintain moral in a stale enviroment is a victory nonetheless.

PEWPEW!

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 12th 2013, 15:04:37

Is anyone really surprised? :P

Jiman

Member
1199

Oct 4th 2012, 3:54:27

Why did SOL and SOF have equal numbers when it was SOF would made the FS?

Jiman

Member
1199

Sep 7th 2012, 22:05:33

This is very nice to see happening.

Jiman

Member
1199

Sep 4th 2012, 1:06:09

Imag will have every right to hit Monsters next set if they want to. THere is no 'true' reason for Monsters to hit Imag other then because they THOUGHT Imag would hit them.

I know Monsters have been going without giving pacts for some time, and now all of a sudden Monsters wants pacts when its convenient to them for their actions?

There still seems to be a lot not being said on the forums.

Jiman

Member
1199

Sep 2nd 2012, 22:30:31

What is the purpose of this war anyways?

Someone please answer me.

Jiman

Member
1199

Sep 2nd 2012, 22:21:55

I believe everyone who has ever lived should watch this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WibmcsEGLKo

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 28th 2012, 18:40:37

Its already a Hurricane.

Cool, its going to reach up to Windsor.

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 28th 2012, 2:56:47

isnt the point to try to get the most land as soon as possible to stock.

I mean, if you get 30k acers 1 month in, wouldnt you want to stock up for a month?

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 23rd 2012, 20:31:31

I think it isnt right for someone in power to make a choice based on Religious beliefs, rather moral and ethics.

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 23rd 2012, 18:33:09

Servant, you are better then to act high and mighty like this. This thread ignores the work IScode has done, and shows that not even yourself are immune to the issues plaguing this game.

IScode has been doing a great job with Imag, and at every turn he has been very respectful of other alliances, he has made sure that if Imag went to war it was for a purpose.

To go ahead and mock Imag by saying "Monsters Declare Peace" while IScode is president is increddibly disrespectful to the work he has put forward in attempting to make Imag into a "GOOD" and crediable war alliance.

If you are unable to see that, then Servant, you must simply be one of those netters who think that game should be all about netting and no wars.

You are better then this. Dont get carried away.

Edited By: Jiman on Aug 23rd 2012, 18:35:21
See Original Post

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 22nd 2012, 17:30:12

Exactly, it is so high. It shouldnt be. 2 Months to play a game has always been too long.

Should only be 4-6 weeks, but the same amount of "playing time" of 2 months.

IMO.

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 22nd 2012, 3:25:31

Windows ME sucks.

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 22nd 2012, 3:16:36

You just repeated what I said.

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 22nd 2012, 3:13:02

Better brain washing than everyone else?

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 21st 2012, 2:00:40

Its been changed recently.

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 20th 2012, 5:26:10

Great thread so far.

I think the biggest issue is that those in control of the game simply dont have the gaming background nor the time to transform the game into what we would hope for it. That isnt a purposeful smack in the face to those working on their spare time for the game, just simple facts.

There is only so much we as players can suggest, in the end if those in control dont have the proper game creating background or time to work, then all of these indepths talks are moot.

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 14th 2012, 3:38:22

Jim + Man = Jiman.

Jiman

Member
1199

Aug 3rd 2012, 16:37:08

Due to real life, I am no longer able to dedicate enough time to be a proper FR contact for SOL.

I also wont be active in the game itself as well, so messages to me will likely not be answered.

*hugz*

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 21st 2012, 4:40:57

Fallout 3.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 21st 2012, 4:38:12

Clowns with Guns.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 21st 2012, 4:37:03

Indeed. Part of the issue is that some of us put so much time into the game, we become attached to it emotionally. We have to remember we are playing a game, and getting all emo on each other will only take us so far.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 21st 2012, 4:21:18

You guys and gals have too much time on your hands.

Why doesnt everyone just enjoy playing the game some, try recruiting people into the game, and crushing/netting each other into oblivion. Then we can talk on the forums indepth about positions of honor and game play ethics of different positions.

Is that so hard.

*eats a pie*

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 15th 2012, 17:58:17

TaSk1 no, go away. You have idea what is happening. If you believe anything you just typed, well it doesnt change any opinion I have for you it simply reinforces my thoughts :-)

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 13th 2012, 8:03:28

Everyone makes choices and will live with the choices they make. Tis the way of life and stuff.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 11th 2012, 23:46:20

Get well soon Llaar, I hope they catch the fools who did this.

*huggles Llaar*

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 9th 2012, 16:33:14

When I see someone asking for 100k on a random forum, i see scam.

Plain and simple.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 8th 2012, 5:14:07

Blizzard themselves admitted that gear farming is not sustainable at the moment.

Considering that gear is EVERYTHING in Diablo, this is a huge fail on their part.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 6th 2012, 2:10:23

I made about 3-6mil weekly, until 1.0.3 hit.

At that point, I was making less then 200k a week, mostly because my items were not selling. Ontop of that, stat rolls on rares went to crap compared to before.

Also, all of a sudden i have to commit to hours playing the game versus playing just for 15-30 minutes at a time.

Through my prespective when 1.0.3 came out, the game became a lot longer for no reward.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 5th 2012, 6:44:02

Originally posted by locket:

Originally posted by anoniem:

symac? lol

anoniem? lol

locket? lol

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 4th 2012, 18:38:36

I play to get gear not gold -_-

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 4th 2012, 7:22:36

Delete the game, add bunnies, really anything is good when you dont touch it for several months.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 4th 2012, 6:42:17

Any change is a good change at this point.

It will be interesting to see.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 4th 2012, 2:32:18

I really dont understand why they want to nerf/change gear switching with MF gear. I did it and its ok, but I went from switching gear to having gear on all the time because it simply suited me better.

Now they are going to punish those players whom didnt switch gear in and out. Simply does not make sense to me.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 4th 2012, 1:46:51

A solid issue with possible build diversities is the Neph Valor stacks. Are you able to try to experiment with different skills half way through playing? Nope. If you do you loss all your stacks and at least an hour of playing is gone to waste.

You end up wanting to pick the one and single build that you think will allow you to farm as much as possible without needing to switch skills, because you have no choice.

I like the buffs themselves, I think its interesting, but now that a month has gone by its an obvoius issue.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jul 2nd 2012, 20:36:22

Ever since 1.0.3 came out the game has been falling short on the fun side bit by bit.

Drops are worse, stat rolls on items are worse, the decrease in attack speed made the game feel more sluggish, and nothing I am putting up in the AH is selling anymore.

I am very disappointed right now, as I hoped Diablo 3 would entertain me for months on end as Diablo 2 did.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jun 30th 2012, 4:14:09

Any change is a good change.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jun 25th 2012, 5:01:04

no.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jun 24th 2012, 6:22:53

Originally posted by Xinhuan:

The game is flawed to begin with. The side with larger numbers are usually going to win in a war

I understand Jiman is trying to "fix" this problem with a band-aid, where if every leader only agreed to have fair wars, it will make the situation better. But really, its just a work-around to go around a problem, a problem that exists with the game in its core game design.

Basically, I'm asserting that the "workaround" for even wars is just a temporary stop gap, animosity and revenge and things like that are simply going to get in the way and it is not a long-term solution.

Besides this, there is no such thing as an even war if the FS isn't mutual, and there is no such thing as an even war unless both sides have the exact same amount of preparation time, on top of having even numbers.

What we need is an actual game mechanics change of some sort to discourage gangbangs. The Team server in concept would have worked out great, but it didn't work out because coalitions formed.

From a game design perspective, from the viewpoint of a game designer or game admin, you don't fix a game by letting the player base find a solution - you fix the damn game by changing the game mechanics.

I said that already :O So ya i agree with you 100% :O

Jiman

Member
1199

Jun 23rd 2012, 16:49:17

Originally posted by Marco:

perhaps we can add meaning back to this game? No more dps? 3 sets of unap only? Then tags would actually have reason to war.

This is not a war game, You win this game by being the biggest. Wars are supposed to be fought over ideals within the netting community. War tags are just tags that forgot purpose. No dps for 3 sets, lets get this game back in order. Gangbangs and coalitions shoulx be the for a mutual war goal. An even @on1 will never be a war goal held by 2 tags. Lets stop warring in groups just because these sides have existed for 15 years. Lets redefine the game.

There has always been war tags. -_-

Jiman

Member
1199

Jun 23rd 2012, 6:49:51

I do think that players should not have to worry about even wars.

We as players should not have to be concerned about the state of the game and the well being of our enemies, but that simply isnt the case.

It is a major flaw in this game. The current game rules rely on a bigger player base.

Edited By: Jiman on Jun 23rd 2012, 6:52:48
See Original Post

Jiman

Member
1199

Jun 23rd 2012, 6:44:54

Originally posted by Pride:

I am in a "war" alliance and I take NO honor/pride winning an uneven war. That's why I want to win an even war.

That as well.

Jiman

Member
1199

Jun 23rd 2012, 6:39:18

Lets just start FSing with as many members as possible, and drag every alliance in to wars every single set. I am sure the netting alliance would love that.

As a war allaince, i doubt sof or sol would mind warring every single reset. For the netters though, I am sure they would want a break once in a while.

Again, with a small game its much easier to get everyone involved in a war then when there was a bigger player base.