Mar 11th 2013, 17:33:45
Well yes i would say he is the one with no diplomacy and let me explain why. for these reasons,
reason 1, I was new to the server, i would have accepted a message letting me know i did wrong and then a country or 2 killed for my mistakes which seems fair, not my entire chain killed.
2, i asked him why he was attacking me not knowing i had done wrong, and he didnt reply and continued to attack.
3 Then this man takes a pause after i remake all of my countries back all 16 and retag myself. i think oh wow finally he is done killing my countries, so i go on playing as normal instead of gearing for war, then what does this punk do? he kills more of my countries and dismantles missiles, i message him, he says he feared that i made new countries to kill him...seems like his attacks there were quite unwarranted, so i got a little heated and said mean things to him and i started to attack since yes i built my countries ready for a war, and guess what? i messageed him suggesting diplomacy and a truce instead of killing his countires off, which i assure you i had enough missiles to do.
and then your punk rockman self get involved for no reason and attack crowgora who realistically had nothing to do with it.
these are the reasons i disagree with how it was played out and how it nearly made this set unplayable and unable to be figured out ,
if he wanted to educate me on proper game rules and structure, he could have used words and cleared the situation up very easily and made us both better off for it. Do you know that he retalled and never left a retal message even? Now that is murky as it is.
anyways Instead of trying to be a cool guy or even an angry but fair guy and at least educate me, he took the jerk role. and thus he made an enemy as long as i play this game as well as yourself.