Verified:

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 17:12:55

we do... the biggest in the industries, the "good actors" are the ones demanding enforcement against the "bad actors" and petitioning for more funding to the FDA... which gets routinely ignored.

no issues spending trillions on more weapons, but a few extra bucks to improve the FDA so we can have a better working system? More money so scientists dedicating their lives for the public good can actually conduct proper studies? Politicians don't like that and taxpayers/voters don't seem to tell them it's a priority...

The FDA is seriously underfunded and understaffed. They're overwhelmed.

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 16:56:28

we also need to fund public science better. Industry funded research is typically 4-7x more likely to find a positive result to industry's interest, compared to publicly funded science- depending on the industry. IIRC the natural/organic/supplement industry has a lower rate of replication than Pharma, but not by much. Many of the organic funded think tank centers such as the Ramazzini institute have never had a study successfully replicated. Pure corruption and bad science.

As it stands we don't give enough grants to public researchers. Universities don't pay their researchers enough... one of my editors has a Ph|D in biochem and is a postdoctoral researcher in cancer biology at UPenn. She requested $25/hr for editing work, which is well above the avg post doc salary. It's disgusting. On top of that, after 5 years as a Post Doc there is a low chance of gaining tenure, and a low payout even if they do.

So scientists go private.

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 16:50:58

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
What in the actual hell are you talking about? The actual cost of getting a new drug to market exceeds $2.5b on average and can take 10-20 years.

You have no idea how this works.


That's even scarier....to know it takes that long and cost that much and still have the problems we have with them :-/ seems to me there's a ton of burocracy....


Overwhelming bureaucracy. The system is full of errors but it’s in place to try to protect people

It needs an overhaul and the FDA needs WAY MORE FUNDING. They need more officers and they need to pay them more to attract and keep better talent

When alt health quacks push unproven ‘cures’ and people forego treatments that work, patients die. The FDA needs to make an example of these people as otherwise everyone will say ‘the FDA does nothing. I’m going to sell bleach enemas as a cancer cure’- which has happened

I recommend reading Ben Goldacre’s Bad Science and Bad Pharma, easy, informative reads that give a good entry into the multitude of issues

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 16:47:36

I honestly have no interest in you trusting me or confidence in making an impact on your thoughts at this point KoH

You’re a conspiracy theorist using ridiculous sources. You lack the knowledge, and likely cognitive abilities, to assess the actual system and know the failures and strengths

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 16:40:38

What in the actual hell are you talking about? The actual cost of getting a new drug to market exceeds $2.5b on average and can take 10-20 years.

You have no idea how this works.

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 16:21:57

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
Originally posted by Savage:
Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
It is a simple question.


Selling ‘cures and treatment’ for diseases as alternatives to proven treatments that work (but are flawed) kill people

Stanislaw burzinksi is an indirect murdered. No hyperbole.


Not directly killing. Just making people believe his treatment is their best choice when it may do nothing. If they had pursued traditional options initially they may have had a better chance.

I’m playing devils advocate here. It’s possible there is something there. As I said before there are some super compelling stories. I’d like to see further clinical testing following the proper protocols.


Yes, hence "indirectly killing". Perhaps there is, and that is Burzynski's duty to conduct proper, 3rd party registered clinical trials. If he has a proof of concept he can justify he should be able to obtain IRB approval from a legitimate board. As it stands there were serious issues with his IRB approvals, leading to them being denied.

the case series' he authored and phase I trials had serious conflicts of interest, Burzynski being the lead author, etc. That isn't how science is conducted. He can yell conspiracy all he wants, but if he has something that works, it was his actions and conduct that has caused everyone to distrust him and stop him from potentially harming people.

Great quote from Polanyi on denying the feasibility of things, but why they must be dismissed:

"to deny the feasibility of something that is alleged to have been done or the possibility of an event that is supposed to have been observed, merely because we cannot understand in terms of our hitherto framework how it could have been done or could have happened, may often result in explaining away quite genuine practices or experiences. Yet this method of criticism is indispensable, and without its constant exercise no scientist or technician could keep a steady course among the many spurious observations which he has to set aside unexplained every day.”"




Are these the same "legitimate boards" that are doing everything possible to discredit and stop the cannabis products from being used by doctors?


CBD really doesn't have the science behind it to justify prescribed use.. maybe for epileptic seizures. Also, CBD is undergoing a lot of studies now.. it is getting a lot of clinical trial approvals. Science takes time. it needs to be done properly

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 16:02:02

Originally posted by Savage:
Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
It is a simple question.


Selling ‘cures and treatment’ for diseases as alternatives to proven treatments that work (but are flawed) kill people

Stanislaw burzinksi is an indirect murdered. No hyperbole.


Not directly killing. Just making people believe his treatment is their best choice when it may do nothing. If they had pursued traditional options initially they may have had a better chance.

I’m playing devils advocate here. It’s possible there is something there. As I said before there are some super compelling stories. I’d like to see further clinical testing following the proper protocols.


Yes, hence "indirectly killing". Perhaps there is, and that is Burzynski's duty to conduct proper, 3rd party registered clinical trials. If he has a proof of concept he can justify he should be able to obtain IRB approval from a legitimate board. As it stands there were serious issues with his IRB approvals, leading to them being denied.

the case series' he authored and phase I trials had serious conflicts of interest, Burzynski being the lead author, etc. That isn't how science is conducted. He can yell conspiracy all he wants, but if he has something that works, it was his actions and conduct that has caused everyone to distrust him and stop him from potentially harming people.

Great quote from Polanyi on denying the feasibility of things, but why they must be dismissed:

"to deny the feasibility of something that is alleged to have been done or the possibility of an event that is supposed to have been observed, merely because we cannot understand in terms of our hitherto framework how it could have been done or could have happened, may often result in explaining away quite genuine practices or experiences. Yet this method of criticism is indispensable, and without its constant exercise no scientist or technician could keep a steady course among the many spurious observations which he has to set aside unexplained every day.”"

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 5:55:41

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
It is a simple question.


Selling ‘cures and treatment’ for diseases as alternatives to proven treatments that work (but are flawed) kill people

Stanislaw burzinksi is an indirect murdered. No hyperbole.

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 5:29:58

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
Originally posted by The Cloaked:
I watched part of it. But it's not only the FDA that has found Burzinsky's work flawed. Government agencies are deeply flawed. But they are also open and leak like a sieve. The idea that corporate greed could shut up the health and regulatory departments of so many countries for so long without people talking is pretty far fetched.

I don't doubt that most big cancer charities are a scam(they are). I don't doubt that big pharma companies don't really care about curing cancer(they don't).

But I also think we're in la-la land if you think mysterious companies can keep regulators across the world from approving cancer cures. I also don't think as many billionaires would die of cancer if it was just money keeping the cure away.


People are talking, FDA and Big Pharma are being exposed, when you have billions $ at your disposal....you can make things happen...did you miss the part where the FDA spent $60m in a campaign to shut down Dr Burzinsky? Thats $60 million that could have been treatment development.....ever wonder why? If he's a fraud...why spend $60m to shut him down? He didn't kill a single person.


He’s a fraud.

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 5:29:13

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
"I’m critical of pharma, the FDA but it isn’t a conspiracy, it’s just flaws in the system"

They conspire to make billions $$, how can you call that a flaw in the system?


Honestly you don’t know what you’re talking about. I do. I know almost every natural health leader in the USA, personally. I formulate products for most major US alt health and natural supplement company’s. I literally was the first external editor on the book in dev by a natural doctor with almost 20 million followers

I deal with the FDA monthly. One of my business partners is from Pharma- he was the head of innovation in a collab between Merck and Zalicus, the largest pharma deal in Canadian history.

I spend tens of thousands a month on regulatory compliance with the FDA. I am an insider.

Read my 3 part series, part 1 here:


https://drinkhrw.com/...nt-trust-health-experts-1

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 5:16:02

Originally posted by daspheebsie:
KOH I don't know you well, but I know you have a tendency to be good people, but please understand that for people that cancer touches their lives every single day, the myth of a cure is just that a myth. I, and I am sure LT want nothing NOTHING more than for there to be a cure to cancer. But right now, there isn't. There are management medications for MBC like Faslodex among others (which one of my friends from child hood is a spokewoman for), we have to be real with ourselves. I know that one day in the future, I will be attending another funeral, for another friend, another family member that has died from cancer. I have to be real with myself that genetically I'm fluffed. Because I have the genes to get the same thing that killed my grandmother.

I hate to invoke him but, Elves knows the pain and the hurt of it, we were married when my Brother in Law passed away from cancer. He was diagnosed 8 months before his daughter was born. He got to see her born, and then died some few short weeks later.

My aunt someone he also knows, passed on Friday, leaving behind two daughters that are still children in their own right, and a granddaughter. A granddaughter she was taking care of because her daughter, the grandchilds mom, died of cancer.

If that makes me a sheeple, then fine. But I don't want to hedge my bets on some theory that the FDA has shut down a cure. What they are talking about there, is a blanket cure. And that cure will never ever work even if it was a thing. Genetically speaking each cancer is different.

I said I wasn't going to get involved. I said I was just going to let it go. But I think you missed my remark on the fact that it is nothing but a theory. A theory that is faulty. A theory that at best a troll because it gives hope to people that are already looking for things that would make life better, to give them extra years.

If you want to find a cure, or help find a cure, get involved with a group of people like Metavivor, or any BCAF. Or any other thing. Because I know that those people are fighting each and everyday to find an actual cure.


Literally one of the clinical trials on a compound of my design is for mitigating the side effects of radiation therapy in patients with high grade gliomas (a very aggressive type of cancer)

The fact is cancer is VERY complicated and a general term for 10s of thousands of different mutations.

We all have ‘cancerous cells’ and millions of them, some are innocuous and some hijack the ability to relicateb(such as hijacking our telomere/telomerase function) and relicate out of control

I’m critical of pharma, the FDA but it isn’t a conspiracy, it’s just flaws in the system

I have hundreds of thousands of words of blog content, some touching on the issues with industry, the black and white dichotomous messaging between pharma and natural, etc

Feel free to read at drinkhrw.com

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 11th 2019, 3:07:33

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
For someone who deals with the FDA (and Health Canada, etc) frequently and has multiple public teams conducting clinical trials on products of my invent, understands the laws and bureaucratic framework, and limitations of the FDA.. the notion they have a conspiracy to cover up cancer cures or treatments is so laughably asinine I cannot find the words




Sheepple also work for the FDA.

🙊🙉🙈


Let me guess.. natural news follower, Alex Jones fan... IQ sub 80

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jul 10th 2019, 23:38:51

For someone who deals with the FDA (and Health Canada, etc) frequently and has multiple public teams conducting clinical trials on products of my invent, understands the laws and bureaucratic framework, and limitations of the FDA.. the notion they have a conspiracy to cover up cancer cures or treatments is so laughably asinine I cannot find the words

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jun 26th 2019, 2:48:26

Originally posted by Jayr:
Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
Originally posted by Jayr:
Originally posted by mrford:
LaF is ruining the game. Super mean people. They also put milk in the bowl before cereal.
laf are the turds in the metaphorical bowl of EE


To think I vouched for you all those years back, argued that we should let you stay in LaF, and tried to help you with advice myself.. when the other leaders thought you were likely mentally disabled and not worth the risk. I've been watching you post the last couple of sets and perhaps I was wrong to give you a chance.
So since i dont like laf, im now "mentally disabled"...more proof of why laf is a steaming turd bowl.


no, like I said I have been following your posts the last couple sets.

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jun 25th 2019, 22:52:01

Originally posted by Jayr:
Originally posted by mrford:
LaF is ruining the game. Super mean people. They also put milk in the bowl before cereal.
laf are the turds in the metaphorical bowl of EE


To think I vouched for you all those years back, argued that we should let you stay in LaF, and tried to help you with advice myself.. when the other leaders thought you were likely mentally disabled and not worth the risk. I've been watching you post the last couple of sets and perhaps I was wrong to give you a chance.

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jun 25th 2019, 18:36:46

ttt

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jun 16th 2019, 16:06:02

ttt

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

May 22nd 2019, 15:03:19

Originally posted by Gerdler:
I have seen Avengers Endgame twice on the cinema. It was epic. I really hope it beats Avatars box office, because that was a really bad movie.


I got choked up several times and that never happens. My girlfriend cried numerous times both viewings (we went twice will maybe to a 3rd)

I didn’t like avatar at all, either

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

May 22nd 2019, 6:00:28

Originally posted by Gerdler:
Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
the last season was trash. Possibly the most disappointed I've ever been over a show/movie etc


Then you had too high expectations. There had been a steady decline in the dialogue and the story since season 5 or so. I think it all started when Barristan Selmy died (This I think was the first big mistake of the writers, tho it may have been forced upon them by contractual issues).


I actually went in expecting to be let down

And was let down below my expectations

Although, Avengers Endgame rising up and being spectacular, during the same time, may be clouding a true rating

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

May 22nd 2019, 1:06:48

the last season was trash. Possibly the most disappointed I've ever been over a show/movie etc

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

May 19th 2019, 22:49:06

sweet, glad she's happy.

Although why you would possibly want to live in the fluffhole of a town I grew up in.. odd move dude.

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

May 16th 2019, 18:39:36

Originally posted by BattleKJ:
Is Lord Tarvana really going to beat me up? He showed me a video of himself cage fighting and threatened me like 10 years ago. He should probably be banned.


have you grown up or accomplished anything in the last decade? Or still a basement dwelling troll?

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Apr 29th 2019, 19:22:02

Welcome back

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Mar 29th 2019, 5:46:40

restarts can be breaking the next day, lol

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Mar 15th 2019, 16:49:51

ttt

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Mar 10th 2019, 8:19:31

Ttt

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Feb 25th 2019, 22:27:59

ttt

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Feb 18th 2019, 17:17:16

ttt

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 26th 2019, 17:45:38

bonus

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 14th 2019, 7:26:34

Buy more oil

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 5th 2019, 21:00:54

Originally posted by sfbob:
Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
I stopped what? I gave up on the country because it was ruined after 2 people taking a run at it? Yes. I stopped because I was afraid of idiotic accusations that are so absurd and not founded in truth? No.

Listen, I get it. You're too stupid to realize what you're saying is stupid. For reference, if you can comprehend it, please see the Dunning-Kruger effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/...ing%E2%80%93Kruger_effect


Fascinating reading, tell me has there ever been a psychological study done on people who are too stupid to remember to buy GDI?


go big or go home, although after coming back after a few years absence it seems the suiciding issue has only gotten bigger, as have hissy fits over single grabs. I never used to run GDI in express, and the first set I played in EE I set a record that stayed for 40 or 50 rounds. I guess times have changed.

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 5th 2019, 20:35:40

I stopped what? I gave up on the country because it was ruined after 2 people taking a run at it? Yes. I stopped because I was afraid of idiotic accusations that are so absurd and not founded in truth? No.

Listen, I get it. You're too stupid to realize what you're saying is stupid. For reference, if you can comprehend it, please see the Dunning-Kruger effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/...ing%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 5th 2019, 20:24:59

My friend, I assure you I am not the one who is stupid. You on the other hand...

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 5th 2019, 20:21:11

^ Well, with you the 3 of you maybe peak at a 250 IQ. I don't believe being suicided to have a country become a parking lot constitutes 'DR abuse'

I'm guessing you're one of those players proud to have finally finished top 100 in Alliance... now that there are less than 200 players hahaha

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 5th 2019, 20:13:38

also, if the mods wrongfully deleted that wouldn't exactly be a bad thing.. the country is toast, well beyond salvageable in any way

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 5th 2019, 20:11:59

what rules violations, exactly? Getting suicided for not being in GDI? Making a grab while thinking it was still recoverable then changing mind and not hitting anyone else?

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 5th 2019, 19:49:09

now I know why I haven't come here in a long time.

I think Invictus and sfbob have a combined IQ of 180 or less, which actually makes them average or above in this game.

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 5th 2019, 18:52:31

I don't know how bad someone has to be at this game to think 100 benefited here.

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 5th 2019, 0:47:06

considering #100 was already flattened the day before for a grab, and #14 threw in CMs and NMs... doesn't seem likely it is a 'working together' situation.

#100 did not hit #14 before, so a bit odd

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jan 1st 2019, 21:42:12

ttt

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Dec 25th 2018, 17:57:16

ttt

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Dec 21st 2018, 14:46:33

Ttt

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Nov 22nd 2018, 20:31:35

honestly it should be tracked who has records in each major era/game change

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Nov 10th 2018, 8:56:52

...

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Oct 31st 2018, 22:12:22

......

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Oct 27th 2018, 17:06:21

tttttttttttttttttttt

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Oct 13th 2018, 17:37:18

ttt

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jun 27th 2016, 0:09:30

Stones killed me

No biggie, I am away on business and lost a bunch of turns, then was hot as I forgot to tag so I was just messing around

I recalled their hits in a 1:1 fashion rather than escalating, they ror'd and sent me PMs saying I had not right to retal as I was untagged... As another was trying to recruit me lol

They've always been bottom of the barrel, a group of losers who cry foul when they aren't taken seriously/farmed/killed but have attempted to bully everyone smaller than them

Losers and hypocrites

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jun 24th 2016, 15:28:10

Originally posted by damondusk:
Originally posted by Lord Tarnava:
Jesus's teachings lack balance. Adherents(true adherents) are very one dimensional
Originally posted by damondusk:
This is my favorite. Let me use the distributive property of bigoted statements to bring that into focus. All "true adherents" to Jesus' teachings will inherently and invariably be assholes, while anyone claiming to be Christian but treating people right is not the real deal? WOW!!!! Here's your hood, Grand Dragon. Heil Fuhrer Tarnava.


You don't have an argument so you need to pervert the meaning of mine. Good job, what you claim I said is not close to what I said


Are you a) shamelessly dishonest b) backpedaling or c) all of the above?
You can't at least stand behind your statements? You stated in your own words that true adherents to the teachings of Jesus are very one dimensional. Aside from the fact that that's a blanket generalization (indians wear feathers, black guys are great at basketball, pit bulls bite, Ford cars all suck, etc), enlighten us as to what "very one dimensional" means. Given the context of everything you've said up to this point, it is entirely reasonable to interpret your statement as meaning 'true adherents to the teachings of Christ reject/shame gays, non-believers, women, whatever' ie are assholes. Do you dispute that this rejection/exclusion/shame is NOT the one dimensional thinking/behavior you referred to? Or do you dispute that this type of thinking and behaving is not assholeish? I think you're flailing. Don't do that; you'll drown faster.


You can't have it both ways. I said true adherents, following christs teachings, lack balance and are one dimensional humans. I stand behind this.

You stated that those citing the Old Testament are not true Christians. Who are you to draw the line? If it's all or nothing, with no context or interpretation allowed, true Christians are those who follow the NT to a 'T' and I stand by the statement they would lack balance.

If interpretation is allowed, they can draw from the OT and ignore parts of the NT, as they see fit, and abhorrent beliefs and actions are born

Lord Tarnava Game profile

Member
936

Jun 24th 2016, 15:23:06

Again you purposefully distort what I say to try to create a point

'Smaller' not small. The Roman Catholic Empire was larger.

Also, all zorps are zaps, but that doesn't mean all zaps are zorps.

At the time of these laws and actions Protestants didn't exist. Catholics and Coptic orthodox followers did and were by a landslides the majority of the Christian population