You fail...to recognize something very important. There are many of them and so few of you...that and you have a family in that SUV. If i was that SUV driver and had my family with me, my first and foremost priority is the safety of my family. Puffing your chest and trying to take on a mob of bikers is stupid.

Im not saying what the bikers did was right. But any smart person with the right priorities would make the wise move and let them pass and pull over. It really doesn't matter how many lanes there are and whose right and whose wrong. The only thing that should matter in this case is the safety of you family.

Hrmmm from what i gather, that SUV almost killed one of the bikers and ran over a couple. I dont know why you would slam the gas and try to kill one of them that's just asking for trouble. He should have just pulled over and let those bikers past.

All of this could have been avoided if that SUV didn't do anything to make the bikers aggressive towards him.

.

I would disagree. A warring alliance in my eyes should always be #1 above any kind of ranking. Why? because if they want to war they will war anybody. LaF is a primarily a netting alliance. If all they did was war, they would lose members. Hence if one day SoF says, F U to LaF and war them for 5-10 consecutive rounds, SoF numbers would be up and LaF numbers would be down. But that will never happen. A warring alliance dictates earth politics. You cannot stop an alliance of SoF size if they want to kill you. The reason why SoF can get away with killing MD for several sets in the past.

The rankings you have is an assumption of how these alliances would perform, rather than factual evidence of the past 2 sets. An alliance can change within a single set i can agree on that...though from what i see the only alliance that has changed is SoL as their numbers have bolstered due to warring SoF... but exactly how many of those members are just from other alliances that want to put a hurting on SoF from past sets of getting killed by them? Exactly how many can they retain after this set and for how long? Those questions cannot be answered as it still needs to be shown/proven. Hence i cannot rank them above alliances that have already shown such answers.


I would rank the top 5 like this:


1. SoF
2. LaF
3. MD
4. RD
5. SoL

SoL having lost to RD while outnumbering them is ranked too high. To say the least that they can take on SoF 1-1 is premature. They have lost to a smaller alliance 1 on 1. What makes you think they will win against a bigger one? Last reset, as well, SoL/LCN/DK lost to RD/Rival while outnumbering them with FA and then a late entry by DK...they lost pretty bad.

Also this is quite biased against SoF as they were on the receiving end of an OOP FS and Sol/Evo/NM are getting a ton of FA from PDM/MD. I would say SoF/RiVaL are doing an amazing job. However it looks like LaF has hung them out to dry pacting MD in the war.

Ranking LaF as #1 is right as they only care about LaF as seen in previouse sets. They can war, net and have the political prowess. Though what would happen if LaF went to war with SoF? Doubt it will happen.

MD hovers around 3-5, not sure why they are #2... though if they win TNW or ANW it will show they can net just as well as they can fight.

.

.

.

SoF/SoL/MD/LaF will be the only alliance that can war properly. Any small alliance will mean it needs to call in allies. Perhaps this is a good thing for those 4 big alliances. Especially for SoF and SoL who love to war, they will be called into every war possible by their smaller allies.

Hrmmm then you are only thinking in one plane... Did you ever think about how long it takes to organize a kill run or how many countries needed to kill said country? What about money and units lost? Probably not from that statement. 1000+ turns without stocking turns means 15-20 countries. I think it's perfectly fine to die in seconds from 15-20 countries hitting 1 single country in co-ordination losing billions of cash. Perfectly acceptable.

Now with the said change all it will mean is that it will take more countries, double that... say around 30-40 countries just to kill 1. That also means double the money lost and unit lose.

This will mean smaller alliances say 25-40 region have 0 chance at killing a single country and probably 0 chance at maiming a country lol... For them to do it, it would mean all members must be online for that single chat. Not going to happen.

Looks like the game is changing to a more netting type game, where Wars will be really thought out properly and more alliances involved.

.

.

.

1

.

Just an observation:

Looks like RD and Rival is farming the fluff outta SoL and company.

Looks like LaF is doing lot of farming too. Is the war over for this group? If so it looks like LaF will have top 10 countries again due to a huge amount of farmland.


Hmmm SOL is definitely a machine in terms of hits + restart rate. But looks to be a losing battle even with the FA they are receiving. They don't have a single country above 2M NW. A couple RD/Rival countries looks like they will be untouchable soon.

Still over a month left, anything can happen.

Lets just make this game even easier and take out all the fun and whatever excitement is left. That way we can cater to all those that have a "Life."

Truth of the matter is, the game is far from perfect. But really... complaining about a fast KR, and trying to tailor the game to suit you wont cut it.

PLENTY of people get on to wall. The tools are there to make this incredibly easy game even easier, dont hate the game because you could care less to get on to wall, or your phone company is slow in sending u an sms. It is what it is.

1

.

.

.

Explain Tag Kill, i still see countries in the SoL tag.

Yes EVO|Rasp that is what i am addressing.

I think the poster does not understand the implications of what he's proposing here. People sharing information like that to strangers is highly unlikely. Even if they were friends, would you give your friend your login to your online bank account? I think not.

Also any major corporation that has the correct policies/security in place has RDP blocked, it's against security protocol to use, it's just too easy to hack....and if you're company does not have it blocked... tell me where you work :p

Hello, I would like to address this post as my profession deals with IT security.

I would like to say that if anybody is doing this for the game, you are putting yourself at risk of identity theft among many other things. That is like giving your key to your house to a stranger and expecting nothing gets stolen.

I seriously doubt, that anybody with some sort of intelligence will do this unless you are a person that does not know how a computer works and is just behind in technology. Most security breaches are due to social networking, sometimes people are tricked over the phone to do this.

.

me toooo

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

pipes!

smlandau84 knows what he's talking about!

.

.

YAY i got quoted! GO DBD!!

.

.

lol good job Havoc! Grats!

.

.

Call it a hunch but i think there's a language barrier here that's causing the misunderstandings from outlaw.

2012-12-10 14:33:53 PS dittie (#60) xWB3x mkrDiesToEasy (#105) CHUB 293A (527A)
2012-12-10 14:33:43 PS dittie (#60) xWB3x mkrDiesToEasy (#105) CHUB 284A (583A)
2012-12-07 19:58:35 PS dittie (#60) xWB3x mkrDiesToEasy (#105) CHUB 203A (387A)

Surprised CHUB didn't join in.

I see 5 different tags that #60 double tapped. It was bound to happen.

.