Verified:

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Sep 3rd 2025, 0:17:35

This was caused by a bug that should be fixed now.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 28th 2025, 23:56:07

Originally posted by SuperFly:
He has a 10 year ban. How do u expect a reply?


He's banned because he requested that the moderators ban him. How lame is it to request a ban then attack the moderators for fulfilling the request? Why do you do weird stuff like this instead of just playing the game?

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 28th 2025, 23:07:13

If a player asks you to post something on his behalf it's probably because they are forum banned. A non-banned player would simply post it himself.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 27th 2025, 2:03:01

Every experience that I've had with Dark Demon has been positive. He seems like a nice guy who cares about the game.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 27th 2025, 0:01:09

Originally posted by Suicidal:
Originally posted by Slagpit:
Hi Suicidal,

That's pretty much how things already work? Here's an example AT post that got someone forum banned: https://www.earthempires.com/...e-talk/slag-53744#1055972

I'm glad that we're in agreement about this and thank you for your public support.


Slag, just don't take stuff personally. Remember, it's just a game and comments can be simply ignored.
Do you know why women fluff so much? Cuz they never fart and if they didn't fluff, they would explode.....not saying that the game fluffers are women...they just act like one (maintain a sense of humor. it's important to mitigate stress)


It's not a problem that I can solve by myself. When a post like that shows up there are four ways to deal with it:

1) Ignore it - this normalizes abuse towards the entire game staff and makes for a bad first impression to prospective players
2) Argue with the user and defend myself - waste of time and looks unprofessional
3) Delete the post - most of the time the user will just post it again more times (see the recent llaar spam)
4) Ban the user

I've been telling folks for over a year that they need to focus on playing the game instead of doing all of this weird stuff that is outside of the game. Now we're at the point where major alliance leaders honor and encourage these disgusting acts. I expect that things are going to get a lot worse in the short term.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 26th 2025, 14:54:11

Hi Suicidal,

That's pretty much how things already work? Here's an example AT post that got someone forum banned: https://www.earthempires.com/...e-talk/slag-53744#1055972

I'm glad that we're in agreement about this and thank you for your public support.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 26th 2025, 5:27:51

If you just play the damn game then you won't have any problems. That's the ee experience for the vast majority of the players. Some players who insist on doing weird stuff outside of the game do manage to earn bans.

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
Don't challenge the status quo, don't make fun threads, don't hurt anyone's feewings..... Should be added to the forum rules TBH.


You already said that you're quitting the game and you got like 25 complaining posts in a row. How is this fun for you? Are you trying to make everyone miserable here?

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 26th 2025, 1:09:17

Originally posted by SuperFly:
Originally posted by UgolinoII:
I agree, all of those things sounds great, and so far as I know none of those things invoke bans, but your position that banning is bad because of Mehul is ludicrous.

Unless you are SuperFly, in which case bans are frequently applied due to his inability to net, and his abuses of power appointing unofficial spokesPERSONs for monsters.

But what would someone with a 690 post count know about forum posting! I'll wager that your mother was a hamster and your father smells of elderberries.


Some of the things that got people forum bans and even games bans differ vastly in severity. I will reserve my biased personal feelings as I love this game, I love the ability to play and I plead the fifth on my feelings and beliefs.

PS. i have never been banned for my ability to kick netter azz. However, me and the boys did dominate team server so good that its archived now. I will shed a IRL tear if the same happens to our beloved 1a / alliance server one day.


You and I both know that it's easy to avoid bans. You also know that making posts like this hurt the game that you love. I don't understand why you do it.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 21st 2025, 15:15:32

Fun fact: we're only 5 weeks into this round of Classic and we already have more harmful spy ops performed than during the entirety of last round.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 21st 2025, 15:10:58

Sure, Hessman123 used to engage in a lot of destructive behavior including targeting players as a group due to cross server grudges. His account was placed under military sanctions. He sent me a message years later asking to be removed from military sanctions. He said that he would try to netgain and wouldn't grief people anymore. He did well for a while but it seems like one bad round is all it took for him to go back on his word.

Just goes to show the futility of giving players N chances. It never goes any other way.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 21st 2025, 1:28:26

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 19th 2025, 18:46:20

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
Originally posted by Slagpit:
Originally posted by Hessman123:
Welp, I don’t have any chance to win anymore

However, rather than quit I’ll be going to go back to playing the way I played years ago

Let’s see how many countries I can start a fight with at once, lol


I wouldn't recommend it.



Yeah you will be sanctioned Hessman, we aren't allowed to play this game the way we want to anymore.


It is disappointing that the person who has been given the most special treatment out of anyone (you, in case that isn't clear) constantly complains and turns himself into a victim when the situation doesn't even involve him. Just give it a rest already. How is this even fun for you? Can't you just play the game?

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 19th 2025, 14:06:48

Originally posted by Hessman123:
Welp, I don’t have any chance to win anymore

However, rather than quit I’ll be going to go back to playing the way I played years ago

Let’s see how many countries I can start a fight with at once, lol


I wouldn't recommend it.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 18th 2025, 23:26:13

The fix is still in progress.

15 credits have been awarded to all players who had premium active during the past 8 days.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 10th 2025, 17:46:59

The full details are on the GDI page. Let me know if anything is confusing.

"You may perform special attacks against a target that has performed two or more offensive actions against you that is within 25% and 400% of your networth.

You may perform harmful spy ops against a target that has performed two or more offensive actions against you without any networth restrictions."

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 10th 2025, 12:51:06

Lions Gate (#70) performed 79 landgrabs last round. For 75 of those landgrabs, he got a successful info op within 15 minutes of attacking the target. Turmoil (#67) never got a successful info op within an hour of any grab by Lions Gate (#70). The cheating pattern that you are alleging (#67 was somehow performing spy ops on behalf of #70) is false. We don't delete player countries based on the opinion of an angry mob.

Time differences in the data below are in seconds. The spying and grabbing pattern is extremely typical.


╔════╦══════════╦════════════╦══════════╦══════════╗
║ ║ success ║ time ║ diff_70 ║ diff_67 ║
╠════╬══════════╬════════════╬══════════╬══════════╣
║ 2 ║ 1 ║ 1754412153 ║ 89 ║ NULL ║
║ 3 ║ 1 ║ 1754412158 ║ 94 ║ NULL ║
║ 4 ║ 1 ║ 1754412288 ║ 41 ║ NULL ║
║ 5 ║ 1 ║ 1754412292 ║ 45 ║ NULL ║
║ 6 ║ 1 ║ 1754412298 ║ 51 ║ NULL ║
║ 7 ║ 1 ║ 1754440726 ║ 38 ║ NULL ║
║ 8 ║ 1 ║ 1754440732 ║ 44 ║ NULL ║
║ 9 ║ 1 ║ 1754440744 ║ 56 ║ NULL ║
║ 10 ║ 1 ║ 1754440787 ║ 99 ║ NULL ║
║ 11 ║ 1 ║ 1754440975 ║ 40 ║ NULL ║
║ 12 ║ 1 ║ 1754440979 ║ 44 ║ NULL ║
║ 13 ║ 1 ║ 1754440984 ║ 49 ║ NULL ║
║ 14 ║ 1 ║ 1754441461 ║ 27 ║ NULL ║
║ 15 ║ 1 ║ 1754441466 ║ 32 ║ NULL ║
║ 16 ║ 1 ║ 1754441470 ║ 36 ║ NULL ║
║ 17 ║ 1 ║ 1754441475 ║ 41 ║ NULL ║
║ 18 ║ 0 ║ 1754441634 ║ NULL ║ NULL ║
║ 19 ║ 1 ║ 1754441672 ║ 68 ║ NULL ║
║ 20 ║ 1 ║ 1754441678 ║ 74 ║ NULL ║
║ 21 ║ 1 ║ 1754441682 ║ 78 ║ NULL ║
║ 22 ║ 1 ║ 1754441687 ║ 83 ║ NULL ║
║ 23 ║ 1 ║ 1754441693 ║ 89 ║ NULL ║
║ 24 ║ 1 ║ 1754442169 ║ 147 ║ NULL ║
║ 25 ║ 0 ║ 1754442174 ║ 152 ║ NULL ║
║ 26 ║ 1 ║ 1754460272 ║ 18250 ║ 13075 ║
║ 27 ║ 1 ║ 1754460282 ║ 18260 ║ 13085 ║
║ 28 ║ 1 ║ 1754460294 ║ 18272 ║ 13097 ║
║ 29 ║ 1 ║ 1754494608 ║ 31 ║ 47595 ║
║ 30 ║ 1 ║ 1754494614 ║ 37 ║ 47601 ║
║ 31 ║ 1 ║ 1754494619 ║ 42 ║ 47606 ║
║ 32 ║ 1 ║ 1754494911 ║ 33 ║ 30494 ║
║ 33 ║ 1 ║ 1754494916 ║ 38 ║ 30499 ║
║ 34 ║ 1 ║ 1754494922 ║ 44 ║ 30505 ║
║ 35 ║ 1 ║ 1754495316 ║ 81 ║ 112611 ║
║ 36 ║ 1 ║ 1754495321 ║ 86 ║ 112616 ║
║ 37 ║ 0 ║ 1754495329 ║ 94 ║ 112624 ║
║ 38 ║ 1 ║ 1754495585 ║ 36 ║ 48304 ║
║ 39 ║ 1 ║ 1754495592 ║ 43 ║ 48311 ║
║ 40 ║ 1 ║ 1754495603 ║ 54 ║ 48322 ║
║ 41 ║ 1 ║ 1754512490 ║ 41 ║ 5672 ║
║ 42 ║ 1 ║ 1754512495 ║ 46 ║ 5677 ║
║ 43 ║ 1 ║ 1754512500 ║ 51 ║ 5682 ║
║ 44 ║ 1 ║ 1754518344 ║ 110 ║ 71645 ║
║ 45 ║ 1 ║ 1754518354 ║ 120 ║ 71655 ║
║ 46 ║ 1 ║ 1754531967 ║ 89 ║ NULL ║
║ 47 ║ 1 ║ 1754531973 ║ 95 ║ NULL ║
║ 48 ║ 1 ║ 1754531979 ║ 101 ║ NULL ║
║ 49 ║ 1 ║ 1754532276 ║ 41 ║ 7581 ║
║ 50 ║ 1 ║ 1754532477 ║ 81 ║ NULL ║
║ 51 ║ 1 ║ 1754535274 ║ 593 ║ NULL ║
║ 52 ║ 1 ║ 1754577320 ║ 38 ║ NULL ║
║ 53 ║ 1 ║ 1754577327 ║ 45 ║ NULL ║
║ 54 ║ 1 ║ 1754577503 ║ 66 ║ NULL ║
║ 55 ║ 1 ║ 1754577508 ║ 71 ║ NULL ║
║ 56 ║ 1 ║ 1754577518 ║ 81 ║ NULL ║
║ 57 ║ 0 ║ 1754577590 ║ 34 ║ NULL ║
║ 58 ║ 0 ║ 1754577608 ║ 52 ║ NULL ║
║ 59 ║ 1 ║ 1754577617 ║ 61 ║ NULL ║
║ 60 ║ 1 ║ 1754577623 ║ 67 ║ NULL ║
║ 61 ║ 1 ║ 1754577627 ║ 71 ║ NULL ║
║ 62 ║ 1 ║ 1754578547 ║ 104 ║ 37809 ║
║ 63 ║ 0 ║ 1754578554 ║ 111 ║ 37816 ║
║ 64 ║ 1 ║ 1754578735 ║ 51 ║ 131767 ║
║ 65 ║ 1 ║ 1754578740 ║ 56 ║ 131772 ║
║ 66 ║ 1 ║ 1754578745 ║ 61 ║ 131777 ║
║ 67 ║ 1 ║ 1754579461 ║ 480 ║ NULL ║
║ 68 ║ 1 ║ 1754579467 ║ 486 ║ NULL ║
║ 69 ║ 1 ║ 1754579473 ║ 492 ║ NULL ║
║ 70 ║ 0 ║ 1754580854 ║ 54 ║ NULL ║
║ 71 ║ 0 ║ 1754580877 ║ 77 ║ NULL ║
║ 72 ║ 1 ║ 1754597420 ║ 114 ║ NULL ║
║ 73 ║ 1 ║ 1754597767 ║ 79 ║ NULL ║
║ 74 ║ 0 ║ 1754598106 ║ 182 ║ NULL ║
║ 75 ║ 1 ║ 1754598120 ║ 196 ║ NULL ║
║ 76 ║ 1 ║ 1754598124 ║ 200 ║ NULL ║
║ 77 ║ 1 ║ 1754598128 ║ 204 ║ NULL ║
║ 78 ║ 1 ║ 1754598133 ║ 209 ║ NULL ║
║ 79 ║ 1 ║ 1754638383 ║ 58 ║ 44272 ║
║ 80 ║ 1 ║ 1754638388 ║ 63 ║ 44277 ║
╚════╩══════════╩════════════╩══════════╩══════════╝

Edited By: Slagpit on Aug 10th 2025, 12:54:25

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 10th 2025, 4:37:30

There were four examples of it happening last round alone. The game moderators do not have the luxury of making up facts and going by vibes. They investigate the specific circumstances.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 10th 2025, 4:24:06

Yes, it is embarrassing that you guys are inventing a completely different set of facts. I mean really, claiming that "no op at all" was performed? How can you even pretend to know whether or not a successful informational spy op occurred? The game doesn't inform of you that. Did Drow hack the game's database?

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 10th 2025, 4:16:40

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 10th 2025, 3:16:34

Failed informational spy operations do not convey any information and do not change the game state; thus, cheating is not possible with them. Hope this helps.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 10th 2025, 0:41:32

1) Complaining about getting killed by a group of players
2) Complaining about getting farmed
3) Complaining about a single land grab
4) Complaining about getting your banks bombed
5) WE ARE HERE => Complaining about failed informational spy ops <= WE ARE HERE

It's especially strange to see the players against military sanctions complain about failed informational spy ops. I just don't get it. Informational spy ops are even allowed on the Cooperation server. If they upset you that much then there really isn't any game server that can accommodate your needs.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 7th 2025, 15:16:54

Classic and Express have the same rules. Classic has no NPCs. The idea that player are not allowed to hit player countries is obviously false.

In general, I think that players should be extremely suspicious of anyone here who claims to not even like playing the game. Why is someone here if they don't even like playing the game? IMO the answer is pretty obvious but I'll keep it to myself at this time.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 7th 2025, 15:10:40

For the record, his reference was to about ten deletions or so that occurred back in 2014. Not 2024. 2014.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 6th 2025, 16:30:09

There is zero tolerance for players lying about game staff actions in an attempt to stir up drama or cause trouble.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 5th 2025, 16:30:49

Superfly isn't sanctioned

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 4th 2025, 5:25:09

Base spy operation returns have been kept the same for the Cooperation server, but spy tech now provides a bonus to returns. So stealing ops have been buffed compared to Change Set 29. I realized that limiting the amount of resources lost by NPC countries didn't really matter.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 4th 2025, 5:22:19

I believe all changes for the Cooperation server are now documented in the game so removing the sticky for this thread.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 2nd 2025, 21:55:16

This bug applied to the country level and would be cleared if the player ever viewed news manually. If the player did not view news manually then the bug would continue to apply to that country.

The bug should be fixed now for all countries. Note that countries currently impacted by the bug may see a large number of news items upon first viewing of the main page.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Aug 1st 2025, 16:23:53

Originally posted by allbymyself87:
"* A country cannot self-delete within 7 days of performing an attack or spy op against another country. The previous restriction was 3 days and only applied to attacks."

Including attack or spy op against bots?


Yes.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 31st 2025, 15:13:26

This has been fixed.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 30th 2025, 23:21:31

On a coop-style express you wouldn't have ingame allies, diplomacy, or any reason to send ingame messages or post on the boards. It would be missing too much player interaction.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 30th 2025, 18:12:41

Originally posted by SuperFly:
Originally posted by Slagpit:
A solo PvE environment already exists. There are plenty of solo tags on the Cooperation server.

There are no plans to do a permanent coop style Express server. There wouldn't be anything to talk about on the forums for such a server. We have that problem already for Cooperation but that's mitigated by clans having discussions amongst their own members.


thats good to know hopefully everyone goes and joins coop to have their own solitary experience.

on coop boards being dead, thats cool that SKA has communication within the tag. i joined TIE and not one message on discord or via country messaging. completely dead tag lol


It's the other way around. In my opinion, the game is more fun when playing with friends. Cooperation is best enjoyed in an active tag with lots of discussion about various topics. You could also get that destocking help that you kept asking for. However, some players prefer the solo experience and they are welcome to do that on the Cooperation server.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 30th 2025, 4:18:26

This still applied to tournament: "During the last 30 turns of a reset, the humanitarians range will tighten with ((turnsleft/31.7)^2+1.05) with a minimum of the range"

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 30th 2025, 4:17:05

A solo PvE environment already exists. There are plenty of solo tags on the Cooperation server.

There are no plans to do a permanent coop style Express server. There wouldn't be anything to talk about on the forums for such a server. We have that problem already for Cooperation but that's mitigated by clans having discussions amongst their own members.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 29th 2025, 18:54:36

Superfly, your own excellence at the game is exactly the problem. We all know that a player of your high caliber doesn't think that a rainbow is a good strategy, but here you are defending rainbows in an attempt to pretend that you weren't griefing. Come on, we all know better.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 29th 2025, 18:06:43

Originally posted by SuperFly:
To me it seems like most of you just want Slagpit to turn express into express coop.

Because hitting another country even if it’s one PS is considered griefing by most of you because in your head, nobody should be grabbing a player if there are bots around and that’s why none of you carry turrets because you expect that it is your right to not be grabbed by somebody else


Hi Superfly, you are free to pretend that 121 landgrabs is the same thing as "one PS" if you want but I suspect that you won't convince anyone with that kind of argument.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 29th 2025, 18:02:54

Hi Superfly, you already understand the difference but I'll explain it here for the benefit of those who don't play on Alliance server.

On the Alliance server, players self-identify into groups using their tags. If clan A has a problem with clan B then they may choose to declare war on Clan B. That's just politics.

On the Express server, there are no clans or politics and players often choose new country names each round. #76 is just excessively hitting countries at RANDOM in order to ruin the playing experience of others.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 29th 2025, 15:09:12

Next round we're going to start placing the truly egregious offenders into military sanctions.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 26th 2025, 15:25:56

There was a bug where GDI costs would be applied to countries not in GDI on some servers. This bug has been fixed.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 26th 2025, 5:25:45

Last four rounds have had a farmer, casher, techer, and indy win once.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 26th 2025, 4:20:18

Originally posted by KoHeartsGPA:
Originally posted by Slagpit:
This is what happened last round:

Country A landgrabs country B.

Country B retals country A.

Ratski then performs general spy ops on both country A and country B after all of the action is done.

The claim made by three of you at this point is that Ratski was cheating to help country B. This is absurd.

Stop trying to make trouble by throwing out false accusations towards me and by bullying other players. I don't know what you guys need to do to get this out of your system but consider this your notice that you need to work through it somewhere else. It isn't welcome on these boards.


I didn't make any accusations, I stated facts, the guy has a history of shady gameplay backed by actual cheating therefore there is merit in the accusations by Cathankins, and I could care less what you do to me either if what I'm saying is factual, if you want to ban me for speaking out against cheaters, so be it.



You charged into a conversation that didn't involve you and asked "why are you protecting a cheater now?" Would you behave in such a rude and belligerent fashion in real life?

Just walk away. You don't even play on this server.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 26th 2025, 4:18:48

Originally posted by Cathankins:
Yea I’m not accusing him of cheating this set either. I just thought it’s suspicious he’s spy opping his friends war opponents. There’s an obvious bias there at the least and he’s up to something at worst. I didn’t matter anyways I finished 70 mil. If a player develops a reputation amongst the userbase for this stuff and they talk trash I don’t see how that’s not fair play.

He named himself after a rat. I feel like he’s some epic troll.


Stop trying to make trouble by throwing out false accusations towards me and by bullying other players. I don't know what you guys need to do to get this out of your system but consider this your notice that you need to work through it somewhere else. It isn't welcome on these boards.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 26th 2025, 1:42:40

This is what happened last round:

Country A landgrabs country B.

Country B retals country A.

Ratski then performs general spy ops on both country A and country B after all of the action is done.

The claim made by three of you at this point is that Ratski was cheating to help country B. This is absurd.

Stop trying to make trouble by throwing out false accusations towards me and by bullying other players. I don't know what you guys need to do to get this out of your system but consider this your notice that you need to work through it somewhere else. It isn't welcome on these boards.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 26th 2025, 1:27:05

Originally posted by Cathankins:
Actually I was messaged by other players who noticed you running suspicious spy ops that just so happens to be against all of the countries your buddy hit. Isn’t that convenient you spied both countries he hit?


You are out of line and your accusations are without merit.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 25th 2025, 20:02:24

This has been a rule for the past 14 years I think. The new GDI page calls it out:

"During the final 6 hours of the round, only informational spy ops are allowed unless the target has already engaged in one or more offensive action against you."

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 23rd 2025, 4:20:46

Originally posted by NitelL:
Basically the details are also wrong.

Attack Range Limit
GDI authority prevents offensive actions against another country which is 8 times bigger or smaller than it.
GDI
All countries are forced to join GDI. The cost of GDI membership is $3 per non-cs building.

Pretty sure it's half? So half of it accurate in-game, half of it accurate in server details?


This is because "humanitarians" is going away as a concept for change set 30 and everything is instead blamed on GDI. The server details are wrong for tourney because it's stuck on an old version.

Slagpit Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
5385

Jul 21st 2025, 22:47:41

This should be fixed now. The problem only occurred with the "Default" attacking style.