Oct 21st 2022, 19:55:29
Gelder: I have no problem keeping the discussion civil, but it has to be applicable to everyone. I have been called an idiot by someone here and this was sanctioned, as I was told we are allowed to call people idiots. So, as long as the rules are the same for everyone, I am totally aligned. If the rules are not the same for all, then there is a problem. I do not even believe that person is civil enough to simply apologize and state that this was a mistake. It takes something that I am not sure this person has. I will stop here on this subject.
One nuance to all the proposal. Maybe there is something that I don't see, but what I was proposing is not to open the war channels both ways. If you are being farmed by a strong country that escapes after jumping, what I am saying is that there should be an allowance for retaliations, to certain limits. At least enough to make the farming not worth it, if the small country has what it takes to fight back. The other way around would then get the small country probably killed. So, the proposal is to allow for retaliation, then reapply the rule, but only attacks possible of the small on the large.
Now, this is where we get, I believe, into the biased zone. I am sure that most who are working at improving this game are in the top players. So, it's not something in favor of strong players, but it could protect smaller players and keep get a strong player to hesitate and think twice before attacking a small player. It is way too easy to check players that are very close to the limit, accumulate turns, attack and then jump. Not rocket science.