Originally
posted by
dagga:
"Imag and SOL combined had many more countries than LCN."
- Selective rubbish. LCN had many more countries than imag. LCN/Omega had more countries than SOL/imag. You can't pick or choose sections of a war to justify your point.
"RAGE and SOL combined had many more countries than LCN."
- LCN had DOUBLE the countries of RAGE. So, if you want to use your 'pick and choose' method, you should be wailing on LCN because at some point in their war they had a huge numbers advantage.
Slagpit, you have retreated to your 'you had more countries' crap, but the fact is, none of those wars were ever uneven or approximating bully behaviour. SOL joined in two wars at the behest of their allies and won the third war with a big numerical disadvantage. What is your point? SOL are bullies and deserve a gangbang because of that? Keep justifying your pro-gangbang stance only when it suits - i.e. when its done on SOL because you still cant get over a war that happened two years ago.
You are dangerous.
I will point out one thing. If SOL had stepped in to help in a timely fashion (read: a time frame under ten days) we would've stood a much better chance at winning that war.
As it stands, even though SOL has never farmed iMag to the extent that LCN/FIST did that set, I like LCN a whole lot more than SOL. Granted, they don't have dagga, but still...
