What I don't like is that he was found guilty based on "he said/she said".
I'm certainly not condoning it, if he did it, but the Family court judge David Jones issued a report on his findings and concluded that there was “preponderance of evidence” that Busch committed an “act of domestic violence.”
What was this "preponderance of evidence"? Was there an actual witness? Was there at least someone who saw his girlfriend right after the incident who testified that they saw the bruises or marks, or whatever? Was there a series of "incidences" that led up to this to show he has a history of this behavior?
I don't know the full story, so I have to trust that the court investigated his past, along with this specific incident to find enough evidence to say he is guilty.
Originally
posted by
farmer:
I don't really understand the reasoning behind suspending a driver or athlete over something that happens off the field.Just saying when was the last time a line worker got fired for slapping around his wife/gf. If they have a problem with anger get them some help don't fire them or suspend them.
farmer, I do agree with you, however, a normal line worker doesn't represent a company in the public eye. Famous people, who are made famous because they are part of a professional sport, do represent that sport. So, that sport management has the right to take that person out of the public eye.
I do like that NASCAR waited until he was found guilty before they acted. Although, he shouldn't be suspended indefinitely. He should be made to make some public reparations, like anger management classes, give some public appearances at anti-domestic abuse rallies, that sort of thing, along with a short suspension until these other things are completed.