Apr 25th 2011, 15:43:47
[quote poster=Junky; 9088; 158007]I'm thinking 2 tags would just make land trading via same clan easier todo without getting yelled at..
Land trading between EVERYONE would be easier to do, I don't believe any one tag would be able to exploit this w/o leaving themselves vulnerable to landgrabs from other tags.
remember; any l337 tagger can hit anyone in any tag and expect a retal ONLY from the country it hit.
But they risk being too landfat w/o sufficient defense becuase l337 and Uber taggers can hit them and also expect a retal ONLY from that landfat country they hit, and not some near all jetter within that tagger's tag.
Uber taggers can still hit other Uber taggers and expect normal policing of policy, which is almost guaranteed a retal.
So everyone will want to hit the l337 taggers(though in the beginning there may be few to choose from) since risk of retal is less for them = more challenge to l337 taggers, although the l337 taggers have a larger target base to choose from and less risk of retal since the targets would likely be targets that wouldn't be able to retal. That is the all natural non artificial check n balance of this treaty that would change the server for ever! Methinks for the better, we don't need AI bots ( that could really be exploited IMO) or more players, but the more the merrier. Changes I can foresee are no more no-military start up strats = more military in market, more demand for oilers, more demand for different techs. larger ending acre and networth margin between skilled and the rest of the players, because the more time one is willing to invest in doing skillfull grabs and strategizing how to keep the acres.
3 or 4 tags per alliance? how so would this occur?
