Originally
posted by
DerrickICN:
In specifically my case, I had about 3 failed spy ops from #102 seconds before 2 tech steals and then prompty a failed market spy and we have matching nw changes.
So #102s highly mediocre spies failed 3 ops, then became elite ninjas, succeeding 2 ops, then fail another just because thats not a harmful op?
If he was taking turns as an indy at the time would he not be having NW changes even if he didnt acquire new tech?
So our speculation are proof of the bad blood between us, even though we manage to cool our heads and not act on it. Meanwhile your suspicion is a reason to declare war. I know you have other reasons for it but you just had to include BS tech stealing accusations as a part of it to get a sliver of legitimacy. You didn't have to, and it now serves to delegitimize you further instead.
Your theory is breaking apart before you and to further that I could tell you that #102 would get lower returns than the returns in the news you have given us as he had really low techs at the first times you accused us. The formula for tech stealing is quite easy, with old ops you can do this math yourself and find out your reasons have been dreamed up in a hurry and that you should have gone with something true.
Or I don't know, maybe we have an 80-SPALer who is just really really lucky, and I will enjoy his spy op luck in our warchats throughout the war, haha. :)
As for RED topfeeding us. They asked us for a pact, and we happily accepted as we have no reason to not be pacted with them. Had we not had this opportunity we would have retalled the top feed and asked for a pact. The game is totally different with the bots around and no small tags will ever suffer from LaF as long as they are around. Again you show that you are a bully for the sake of bullying. And you can't compare that to your BSS BS which was in a whole different era where land was scarce.