Since when can you finish a sentence without mumbling?

Slag,

Honestly man. I’m glad you are having fun and stirring the pot.

I suggest maybe taking some time and getting to know us over on this side too.

Merc’s doors are always open to you

i invited him earlier to Mercs I thought he was considering it but he didnt take me up on my invite :(

Slag aligned himself with the Axis of Evil instead :(

I will see if we can turn him into a double agent and cause havoc and dissention on the other side :P

Y'all take this game way too seriously. Slag is an amazing dude and he isn't a liar. You can fault his gameplay and game decisions all you want, but don't personally insult the guy. He doesn't have to explain himself to any of you. He made the decision he made with the information he had. Any of you would have done the same thing. Hypocrites. This is why AT sucks.

These aren’t personal insults. They’re game related.

Sapphire aren’t you a leader from PDM? I hope you are enjoying your “time off” to troll SOL from a different tag.

Nice country name by the way.

I hope you are enjoying your time

If Coalie wants to accuse me of being a liar in a game political context that's fine. Everyone else can choose to believe him or not. With that said, the comment about being a game owner isn't correct and wouldn't be appropriate if it was. I've made $0 from this game.

I would like to point out that Coalie admitted that ATsucks crippled SOL's wargaining.

Spam tag FTW.

SOL was Nancy Kerrigan-ed

I beleive Coalie.

United we stand!

coalie has offered no evidence and i dont know why you would think you should believe that when it s clear that slagpit has no reason to lie and is not surrounded by controversy like coalie is. its clear to me that slagpit was acting on good intel and that sol clearly has something to hide here and the fact that you cant see that mr requiem tells me you don't know how to look hard enough

atsucks is one of the better newer alliances we've seen

Looks like you take it too serious LOLerblades.

Let me ask you; what have you done for this game? I financially support slag.

We'll take that as a compliment. To be fair all the other alliances these days are old, decrepit, and CRIPPLED

I support Slag in ways you could only dream of ;)

Well you are Slag so...

The only alt account I posted on recently was "Buster Douglas".

Slag I will teach you how to be a Real Man.

What does LOLerblades mean?

it means you're gonna skate your way to the comedy club

Welcome to the 90s

I had people calling me Saphire in game yesterday, now today I'm Slag. Should I be offended?

Everyone needs to make up their minds!

Free player peasants!

I, the greatest premium user, have arrived. While you free players sit there with your ads and basic features, I sit on my throne. My benefits? Endless perks.

But don't worry, you can still watch from below as I enjoy my VIP life. Maybe if you try really hard, you'll reach my level. But probably not. 😎

You contradict yourself in this thread Slag.
You say you don't have multiple forum handles, then admit to posting from an alternate forum handle.

I got no skin in this game, but I feel like there's a lot of spin going on here in terms of what's been said so far.

Observations that I'm making here:
1. It was common knowledge that there was an arranged server war happening later this set, involving SoL and M4D, and potentially others.

2. ArseVAMP being the one who posted about the creation of ATSucks in the first place, and putting the tag pass on the boards for all and sundry would indicate that yes, he should be taken as an ATSucks contact, until it's specifically stated otherwise.

3. ArseVAMP has also boasted about multiple SoL countries not being prepped, which definitely runs counter to a claim that they were planning to FS ATSucks.

4. Why would they plan to FS ATSucks, when their membership being more or less even with M4D, would leave them at a distinct disadvantage for that war?

Oh and Req, I financially support EE too, I just can't have a patron badge at this point in time :P

Slag has also offered zero evidence of the claimed planned FS on ATSucks.

Yes, I boasted that they had crappy war countries, because they did. Some better than others.
You literally just contradicted yourself. So maybe worry about yourself instead of Slagpit. You just said they were preparing for a war... So my claims are valid. They're just bad. I don't know why you and others are so incapable of simple reading comprehension.

You would love for us to give up our Intel. Why would we do that? Nah, you figure out your own leaks. No our problem. And yes, leaks. Multiple.

I'm only going to respond to the part that I have to for I think pretty obvious reasons.

People are free to accuse me of posting as "Buster Douglas" because that's one of my handles and I've never made any attempt to hide that. On the other hand, people are not free to accuse me of using "drow" as a forum handle because that's not one of my forum handles and that breaks the rule against staff impersonation.

I did not contradict myself. I said SoL were specifically prepping for a war with M4D later in the set, and that they were NOT prepping to hit ATSucks, and your own observations about their countries supports that observation.

What would be the benefit for SoL in hitting ATSucks? There's no reason for them to do so, and hinders their prep for M4D.

There appears to be no benefit for ATSucks to hit SoL, BUT, it does benefit M4D for them to do so, as it sends SoL into their arranged war already having had to divert resources from prep, and with likely still having to hit ATSucks all set.

It does kinda make a case to an independent for a level of M4D/ATSucks collusion.

On the evidence front, yeah, you guys have thrown the accusation that SoL was going to hit ATSucks, burden of proof is on you to demonstrate that that is the case, not on SoL to demonstrate that they were innocent?

SOL had over 48 hours and 119 posts to deny that they planned to FS us in the war dec thread. They did not do so. But sure man, keep talking about burdens of proof. I'm sure that you'll cut through the spin and enlighten us all.

Since we are all standing in a circle comparing sizes I just wanna say Mines Bigger!

Darkmere Game profile
Member
161

Sep 6th 2024, 23:29:46
Most of your DOW is BS - I expect better.

You are a spam tag, you will be treated as one.

We will see you on the battleground.

DarkMere


Looks like a denial to me.
When the current head of SoL is calling out your war dec as bullfluff....

As an aside, like I said, I'm an independent, and our recent history with Mercs in particular is fairly well documented.

Make of that what you will

Again, the question you keep dodging: what benefit is there to SoL to hit ATSucks going into a prearranged war with M4D? The numbers between the two are even, so why would they want to a) divert resources, and b) increase the number of opponents to fight?

EDIT: where the advantage of ATSucks hitting SoL to M4D is immediately evident in that it leaves an otherwise equal numbers opponent hampered.

There is no logic or sense, and even a moments thought would have had just about anyone asking why they'd do so.

Who is ATsucks? All I see is dead countrys.

Are you seriously tricked that easily? That post says "MOST of the DOW is BS". Which parts are true and which parts are false? That is vague and could mean anything. It is not a clear and direct denial at all.

That's irrelevant tho.
You specifically said that you don't have alternate forum handles, then admitted you have at least one.

EDIT: and dishonesty now seems to be starting to be a thing for your tag, at least in my experience so far.

I'm not dodging anything. You aren't even involved here. You're deliberately inserting yourself into a situation that doesn't involve you and acting in pretty obvious bad faith.

I was told that SOL was planning to hit AT Sucks because they were concerned that the tag was hiding members which could interfere in their planned war. As I already said before in this thread: "Everybody knows that SOL and Mercs are easily capable of both FSing AT Sucks first and doing an arranged war later."

Let me ask you a question since you're demanding so many answers from me: why do you think that so many posters on AT consider lying and misleading others to be virtuous?

No, I said not to make false accusations. Don't you have anything better to do than to be obtuse? What is your problem? Do I enter threads with posts from you in it and try to start inane arguments? This is absurd.

Because it's true that Blackhole claimed 390, it's also true that he was believed and generally known to be a sol member right up til he tagged ATSucks.

If you're what passes for a PDM leader these days then it's not surprising that you guys got tagkilled last round. What a disgrace. I miss the old PDM.

"Don't falsely accuse me of having multiple forum handles"

That's a specific denial that you have multiple forum handles.

"The only alt account I posted on recently was Buster Douglas".

That's a specific admission that you have at least one alternate forum handle.

You got caught in your own comments.

Like I already said, I got no skin in the game, and considering the recent history we have with Mercs, if anything, I'd fall into the camp mercs is not on by default. Yet here I am, finding myself on the opposite side of the fence overall, and that dishonesty seems to be a trend with your group.

My history with Drow is well documented. I declared war on him last set.

But I can vouch that he speaks the truth. It is one of the qualities that I respect most about him.

You will find it very difficult to bulfluff him. I wish you luck Slag.

You arguement was " it is certainly possible that we were fed false intel. I've never said otherwise. " A guy like you? Comon, don't BS me. I know you're not a fool that would easily fall for "false" intel and then subsequently causing your entire tag to turn red.

You had a defined goal to make SOL limp into war, to benefit their a certain group.

Doesn't get much older Paradigm than me.

At this point man, probably take the L here and own it.
I make a point of calling things as I see them, and right now, the preponderance of stuff I'm seeing is not in your favour.

This is not true at all.

Drow is an excellent PDM leader. He could've easily rolled over and play dead like most other netter clans, but he mounted a counterattack and struck us where he can everyday until the last days of the set.

I personally think Drow is a badass. And, PDM is extremely lucky to have him. He has earned our respect.

I don't give a fluff what you think. You engage in bad faith, refuse to answer my questions, and prattle on like a pest deliberately misinterpreting my words. What is the point of all of this?

I demand reparations cuz I was farmed by one of those AT griefers.

I had 0 defense cuz Mercs was netting as evidenced by all the countries that got farmed with less than 10k jets mine included.

I demand sanctions by Slagpit for Slagpit!!

https://www.earthempires.com/...e-tool-49995?t=1661538239

Oh wait my patron ran out and I am a free player again so no one needs to cater to me. Requiem; make the sanctions request on my behalf please

You have a reason to be in this thread. This dude is on my nuts for no reason. He's pretending to not understand that "don't falsely accuse me of having multiple forum handles" means "don't falsely accuse me of having multiple forum handles [that aren't mine]". What kind of sad, terminally online perspective leads someone to post "take the L" without a hint of irony?

Drow isnt on your nuts bro. He looked at the logic, the events, and everything that was said by you and everyone and formulated his own conclusion and opinions.

He's not pretending, I've never seen him pretend to do anything

he calls me out too.

You are telling me that he doesn't understand the difference in sentence structure between "don't accuse me of having multiple forum handles" and "don't FALSELY accuse me of having multiple forum handles"? You're telling me that he thinks that a game/forum admin wouldn't create multiple forum handles for testing purposes? You're telling me that he thinks that I would make an obvious and provable lie (that I've never created a forum handle) for no reason?

Why didn't he ask me for clarification on what I meant instead of immediately making accusations that I was lying? Don't debase yourself by defending someone who obviously wants to act like a pest.

No, I'm engaging honestly, and in good faith.
You chose to move the goalposts.
You could, at any point, have clarified, as I did earlier, that you meant that arseVAMP is not one of your alternates.
Which I already believed wasn't the case anyway.
Instead, you chose to specifically deny that you have any alternate forum handles.
Then later admitted to having an alternate forum handle.

To then double down on it, and choose to attack me personally, rather than simply acknowledge you perhaps mis worded what you were trying to say makes you come across as choosing to be intentionally dishonest and trying to bluff your way out.