Apr 25th 2010, 15:24:48
i will make my point one last time, and then give you all a breathe of fresh air by leaving you alone :P
what happened to russia in world war two was devestating. individual acts of soldiers throwing grenades and blowing up pillboxes, yes, fortifications in stalingrad, peoples houses, yes. tanks exploding coffeshops i'm sure, artillery and carpet bombing. no doubt, devestating and brutal and nobody would want to witness it, or have it happen to their home.
there is still the difference bewteen those acts of brutality done in war, and flying a plane into a building. whether jews do it, muslims do it, or christians do it. the okc federal building was *AS MUCH TERRORISM* as anything al qaudea has ever done.
him and his fertilizer is not akin to canadian soldiers storming the beaches of normandy. war crimes happen, soldiers commit terrible acts while at war. they do not drive a truck into a basement parking garage and walk away. or a night club, or a plane into a building. or the assasination of a civil rights leader would be closer to terrorism than carpet bombing a city.
even when both acts lead to death, destruction and terror
I am wrong, and I am a terrible person for being so, so wrong.
Edited By: braden on Apr 25th 2010, 15:26:30