yea sometimes at fa has to be done, but usually only when someone makes horrible unfounded claims that dont make much sense at all in an attempt to make others look dumb. it doesnt always work.



WILDCARD!

I'm in Sanct, saw this all happen and had we not been warring this set already, would have we killed him?...maybe not, but only to save a netting set.

Personally I think Rage saw we were warring Imag and thought we could be pushed around, only to see we won't be. Being Imag are great sports, they allowed us some time to get this behind us. Would we want to tarry another 3-4 days and risk a war we were looking forward to because some Rager wants to be a fluff?

Our policy is clear and has been for multiple sets. If you don't want to play by our rules or you think them unfair you are free to challenge them, but to do so and expect no consequences is obviously not going to happen. Many other alliances have similar grabbing policies and we abide by them as well and it is common knowledge that the retal policy which helps the defender is going to be enforced. Calculate this all out prior to the hit and you would pick a target which would yield acres for both the attacker and defender.

Do I think L:L is good for the game? It matters not what I think or what is good for the game because such is reality. If Rage wants to change the game get a coalition and force the change, I am sure you will find many willing to join the cause of 1:1 no matter what. As it stands...our policy is what is enforced by us.

/me clicks the Like button for CK's post

I feel a little Kennedy deeply rooted in CK

Deeply rooted, like what Nole's campaign is trying to do for you?

Dodging you? You sat on MSN, posted on here that you were on MSN, all the while you could have IM'd me. But you refused to make that tiny effort to copy/paste an email address and shoot a message. As a result you guys lost a country. Whose to blame now?


LOL, Sorry Thomas I have a life other than you...

FS or gtfo

fluff this!

Soviet FA me some turns!

rage dont be trying to steal any of our kills

(asterisks put in by me for emphasis)

Who is/Who's*

btw :P

What happened? i remember only 12-18 months ago AxA was trying to be pro-active in encouraging LG'ing.

Looks like sanct jumped on the laf/evo bandwagon and support mass farming of untags and no land interchange between established clans=(

Who said LaF and Evo have a bandwagon that is for mass farming of untags.

Every one pisses and whines when LaF and Evo grab them or anything else, what do you want them to do. The second those big TTRs and Midfeeders start grabbing and being unretalable everyone will jump on the all-x and farm them until LaF or Evo tag kills.

If those alliances all play midfeeders then you will all whine about laf and evo farming alliances to death.

So are you saying Rage won't FS next set if LaF runs allmost all midfeeders and farms Rage instead of untaggeds?

DL - We still encourage LGing. We just believe it should be done in a way where both parties have a fair opportunity to benefit over each grab. If that opportunity does not exist, then we swing it in our favor on the defensive.

yea we very much encourage LGing, we just dont beleive in topfeeding. if you want to hit someone close to your size where there is the OPPORTUNITY of a fair retal that is ok. A lot of the time you will both come out ahead, sometimes the attacker will even come out much farther ahead if he/she is smart about it.

OHAI

http://cheezpictureisunrelated.files.wordpress.com/...otos-videos-hey-there.jpg

also

http://chzbromania.files.wordpress.com/...s-isnt-this-bromantic.jpg

lol fdf called sanct gay

i didnt say anything of the sort, just some irrelevant pictures :P

How did you know FDF's name was Kennedy?

fluffin instinct bro.

So Thomas, planning on killing #503 and #297?

That's BS AxA, that is not the case, it's fairly obvious the rage case was deliberatly exploited by Sanct to punish the rager as much as possible.

I expect if Sanct follows their own retal policy, they will allow PDM to rape these 2 countries.

Why would we kill them for 1 grab each?

You're either not following the situation, or ignoring facts.

RAGE topfeed us, we retalled according to our policy. They rejected our retals, retalled again, which is RoR for us, and we retalled, for which they retalled again.

#297 and #503 topfed PDM. Yep. But PDM retals L:L. So unless our guys RoR, there is no reason for them to die. And I already spoke with Detmer about this in private.

http://cheezpictureisunrelated.files.wordpress.com/...wtf-photos-videos-run.jpg

if you really want to make any possible allusion between this fa case and the pic above fine but im not suggesting it :P