Originally
posted by
Flamey:
<u>SoF Doctrine</u>
..SNIP..
...netgaining should be competitive. Two countries agreeing to hit each other to both gain land, leads us to the conclusion that those two players should be playing Sim City. People who grab should be trying to maximise their country, not their rivals; it should be competitive. This is why SoF recognises the right of a country to manipulate SS/PS retals to 79.9%, so that the retaller is entitled to another grab when taking land:land. Therefore, our competitive grabbing is why we do not exchange grabs with our FDPs; only those with uNAP/PPs and no pacts.
<u><b>Policies</b></u>
..SNIP..
However, we will enforce our anti-landtrading/two-stepping policies on all alliances and are prepared to fight over it.
<u>Retal Policy</u>
...SNIP...
We consider it a fair practice if an alliance tries to maximise retals, by trying to get as close to 80% as possible (Using PS/SS if necessary) and taking a final retal. In the same way, we consider it fair play if the attacker tries to get the retaller to fail a retal. This is because we see grabbing as competitive.
..SNIP..
- The alliance that has been two-stepped can take land:land or 1:1, whichever is greater, against the offender.
Flamey, please share your thoughts (and SoF's, if different) on the acceptability of using demoralize spy ops in order to take a retal or make taking a retal easier. Do you and/or SoF accept this practice?
Thanks!