Verified:

torment Game profile

Member
278

Jun 22nd 2010, 5:59:22

This thread reminds me of the old practice of running seperate tags for "training"or killteam and then cross retaling.

I remember MD did it a few times, genesis too with genkill.

enshula Game profile

Member
EE Patron
2510

Jun 22nd 2010, 6:13:15

i was in minimonks for a while

but i think that was something about a split between 3D and charly1i

silverbeet Game profile

Member
96

Jun 22nd 2010, 7:03:04

'ello ex-clan mates. It's fasatime!

santti Game profile

Member
382

Jun 22nd 2010, 10:49:37

I don't want Utopia.
SanttiE is here again!

Requiem Game profile

Member
EE Patron
9477

Jun 22nd 2010, 11:10:20

Here is what I don't get: if everyone hates laf why don't you band together and tag kill them every set?

torment Game profile

Member
278

Jun 22nd 2010, 11:24:35

LaFs had a bit of experience with that type of thing. ALC1, ALC2 & ALC3 for starters.

H4xOr WaNgEr Game profile

Forum Moderator
1974

Jun 22nd 2010, 15:19:48

I'm not saying that we havint gained any new members from other alliances/people coming back that weren't in LaF before.

I'm saying that the members we are gaining from those avenues are only enough to counter balance the retirements we have every round or possibly even a little less.

Thus if that was the only way we were gaining members, our membership would be fairly flat or even have a 1 -3 member per reset decline. It is the half dozen or so old vets we hoodwink into coming back every reset that has keep us at a 2 - 4 country per reset growth rate over the last few rounds.

Hafgan Game profile

Member
18

Jun 22nd 2010, 20:24:17

Originally posted by NOW3P:
Originally posted by Hafgan:
The fact of the matter is that WHY would people choose to play a game when they're just going to get pummeled and farmed to death unless they join the largest alliance? They will join the larger alliances and more than likely, not move on from there. It's the same exact reason why people on Xbox Live or any other form of multiplayer game ALWAYS plays with the cheapest team/equipment possible.


The fact of the matter is, why would people play a game where they're told who they're allowed to play with and who they're not, and where success and skill are discouraged? If you want that environment, go over to team where that IS the set up, and stfu in the unlimited clan servers. The day the mods impose that on all servers is the last day you'll see me hanging around....and I'm willing to bet money others will agree on that.


People do it all the time. You do not join a match on any first person shooter where the other team is full and your's only has two or three players. When that occurs, players often back out or just leave trying to find a different server where the teams are equally matched.

You can take 20 of the best players in this game and then pit them against 73 other countries and see how it turns out. Nine times out of ten, the side with nearly four times the amount of players is going to win. Skill has nothing to do with anything in a game based purely on mathematical equations. If all players from the 73 member alliance log on and participate in the warchat, then that is approximately 8700 turns. As opposed to the side with only 20, then they only have 2400. Mathematically, it is IMPOSSIBLE to win.

Originally posted by NOW3P:
Sorry mate, if you want the REAL reason why Earth was/is dying, just take a look at earthempires vs xbox live, PS network, WoW, etc, etc, etc with all the other new technologies a nearly 20 year old text based game can't compete with. Let me try to put this into simple folk perspective for ya - How many people do you know that still play Sorry/Twister/Charades for fun instead of newer more interactive games????


Sure there are more games to play that have prettier pictures or more novel concepts, but those are things that an invididual cannot do while they are at work/school away from the Xbox, PS3, WoW, etc. I primarily played from work prior to being on vacation because it is something to do to pass the time. Most individuals only need roughly 20 minutes to run their turns (or less). The bottom line of the game is this: it's not time consuming and it's fun. I don't have to sit here spending hours upon hours waiting on members of my raid party to figure out how to down a boss that has been downed four million times before-- been there, done that.

Patience Game profile

Member
1790

Jun 22nd 2010, 20:38:30

You sound awfully familiar.
I cannot see your signature - so if it's witty, put it in a post instead! :p

archaic: Patty, if it was you wearing it, I'd consider a fuzzy pink pig suit to be lingerie. Patty makes pork rock.

Hafgan Game profile

Member
18

Jun 22nd 2010, 23:01:07

Originally posted by Patience:
You sound awfully familiar.


How so?

Forgotten1

Member
834

Jun 22nd 2010, 23:37:40

Moo

Edited By: Forgotten on Jun 23rd 2010, 1:23:01
Forgotten
ICQ 43083642
MSN

Forgotten1

Member
834

Jun 22nd 2010, 23:42:19



I"m almost wiling to bet that 25 LaF members that was war prepped and had FS, would take out 40 LaF members that wasn't war prepped and didn't have a single turn saved.

Actually, we should do that, internal war.


Edited By: Forgotten on Jun 23rd 2010, 1:23:15
Forgotten
ICQ 43083642
MSN

TheORKINMan Game profile

Member
1305

Jun 22nd 2010, 23:50:20

Numbers dont neccesarily mean fluff. I remember huge huge RAGE tags that went to war vs lean smaller tags and got eviscerated. If all you can do is complain about someone else's legitimate success then you probably should just join then because you aren't good enough to challenge them.
Smarter than your average bear.

Forgotten1

Member
834

Jun 23rd 2010, 0:08:15

Size doesn't matter, *points at ARROW*
Forgotten
ICQ 43083642
MSN

H4xOr WaNgEr Game profile

Forum Moderator
1974

Jun 23rd 2010, 1:26:34

I can name a few wars where the odd were strongly against the winner, on a country count basis.

Genesis vs rage, LaF vs ALC1

Dragonlance Game profile

Member
1611

Jun 23rd 2010, 1:30:58

the common theme in those wars is that they happened 10 years ago, when the game was alot more chaotic.

Dragonlance Game profile

Member
1611

Jun 23rd 2010, 1:31:20


Edited By: Dragonlance on Jun 23rd 2010, 2:47:07

TheORKINMan Game profile

Member
1305

Jun 23rd 2010, 1:35:04

Am I missing something or is the game fundamentally different then 10 years ago? It really seems like exactly the same game to me.
Smarter than your average bear.

NOW3P Game profile

Member
6503

Jun 23rd 2010, 2:07:33

Well, enough kicking a dead horse. Just so long as the people who can actually implement the change realize it's a bad idea, I guess we can't expect everyone else to understand why it wouldn't work out....

TOM - it is, just with less people playing because of the neglect it suffered for the better part of the last decade. Some people just haven't figured that out yet, and need a bad guy to blame.

Dragonlance Game profile

Member
1611

Jun 23rd 2010, 2:47:00

20,000 less players, less turns, less skill as people didn't have 10 yrs to hone skills..

needless to say i'm against limited tags.

martian Game profile

Game Moderator
Mod Boss
7841

Jun 23rd 2010, 15:44:12

actually more turns than 10 years ago.
:P
you are all special in the eyes of fluff
(|(|
( ._.) -----)-->
(_(' )(' )

RUN IT IS A KILLER BUNNY!!!

NOW3P Game profile

Member
6503

Jun 23rd 2010, 15:45:02

was it tourney that had 30 minute turns? I can't remember which server that was, but it was ghhhheeeeeyyyy!

qzjul Game profile

Administrator
Game Development
10,263

Jun 23rd 2010, 18:16:07

used to be 40 minute turns in 1A... over nearly a 3 month reset
Finally did the signature thing.