Nov 12th 2010, 19:17:23
Want the server's input on this, please keep the flaming out
So we have this player. He's had some good deeds in the past, and is a good player on other servers, but on FFA he sort of has no control. On multiple occasions he has begged alliances to harbor his netters while his home clan wars. A certian clan, we will call it Clan A, allows him to do so. This player thanks Clan A by nuking their top land country at the end of the set. This player is immediately banned and blacklisted. The very next set, he comes back toClan A and threatens to not pay them their owed reps is they do not once again let him tag his netters for protection. Clan A tells him to fluff off. This angers said player for some reason, and he runs around trying to get other ayers and clans to hit Clan A. So Clan A kills his countries.
After all of this, you would think that this crazyness is over. Well, said player claims he is retiring, and not much is heard from him, however a new player emerges and starte a clan, call it Clan B, and recruits people to play. This new player swears up and down that he is not the notorious player we have been refering to, and that that player is retired. Low and behold, clan A not only discovers that this new player is infact the same person, but this new clan he is forming is going to hit Clan A oop with the help of Clan C. However, it is Clan C that informs Clan A of this and Clan B is left out to dry and is wiped off the map, the notorious player posts a pitiful retirement thread and dissapeard for a month or so.
Fastfoward to present day. The notorious one is attempting to start up clan B again, and swears Clan A is not his intended target.
Now, this is my question. Would clan A be wrong in seeking the destruction, dishonorment, and de-assing of the notorious one and Clan B?
So we have this player. He's had some good deeds in the past, and is a good player on other servers, but on FFA he sort of has no control. On multiple occasions he has begged alliances to harbor his netters while his home clan wars. A certian clan, we will call it Clan A, allows him to do so. This player thanks Clan A by nuking their top land country at the end of the set. This player is immediately banned and blacklisted. The very next set, he comes back toClan A and threatens to not pay them their owed reps is they do not once again let him tag his netters for protection. Clan A tells him to fluff off. This angers said player for some reason, and he runs around trying to get other ayers and clans to hit Clan A. So Clan A kills his countries.
After all of this, you would think that this crazyness is over. Well, said player claims he is retiring, and not much is heard from him, however a new player emerges and starte a clan, call it Clan B, and recruits people to play. This new player swears up and down that he is not the notorious player we have been refering to, and that that player is retired. Low and behold, clan A not only discovers that this new player is infact the same person, but this new clan he is forming is going to hit Clan A oop with the help of Clan C. However, it is Clan C that informs Clan A of this and Clan B is left out to dry and is wiped off the map, the notorious player posts a pitiful retirement thread and dissapeard for a month or so.
Fastfoward to present day. The notorious one is attempting to start up clan B again, and swears Clan A is not his intended target.
Now, this is my question. Would clan A be wrong in seeking the destruction, dishonorment, and de-assing of the notorious one and Clan B?
Swagger of a Chupacabra
[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford
[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford
EE Patron