Originally
posted by
KoHeartsGPA:
Originally
posted by
Captain Control:
Originally
posted by
KoHeartsGPA:
I mean, when you're repeatedly accusing mods of stuff and told to stop it but continue, you're eventually going to be timed out, #childlife
Suppressing free speech... sounds like something North Korea would do.
#Justice4SF
In United States constitutional law, false statements of fact are assertions, which are ostensibly facts, that are false. Such statements are not always protected by the First Amendment. Often, this is due to laws against defamation, that is making statements that harm the reputation of another.
Representing the Law Firm of Dewey, Screwem, and Howl I must point out the facts in this particular case with regard to defamation:
You are assuming that Pat had a good reputation in the community to begin with.
You assume that Pat's mental state is anything beyond a "legend in his own mind".
You would have to assume that circumstances of this case go beyond that of being just a game.
Case Law from said game shows:
No one is banned for killing countries during war.
No war participants are banned for war crimes.
No one is banned for stealing land.
I move for a mistrial and demand reinstatement of our client and would sue for FA as a result of damage to our client.
That being said, we will drop our counter-claim of defamation to our client as he has only been doing things that have been done by many over the years, and some as recent as this set pointing to a personal abuse of power directed to our client.
We would also point out that the only game players that should ever be banned are those that forget this is just a game.
Free SuperFly, Free SuperFly now.