Verified:

hanlong Game profile

Member
2211

Apr 24th 2012, 19:29:35

Originally posted by Pride:
You say defend yourselves BUT, every war this set your parties planned and were on the offensive.


so you are saying MD never planned to FS LaF last reset? you can say that with a straight face? :P
Don Hanlong
Don of La Famiglia

LulzSec

Member
25

Apr 24th 2012, 19:32:56

Originally posted by hanlong:
Originally posted by Pride:
You say defend yourselves BUT, every war this set your parties planned and were on the offensive.


so you are saying MD never planned to FS LaF last reset? you can say that with a straight face? :P


18:09 Don_Hanlong but MD is still a long term problem

DJ SPIN that song!


Edited By: LulzSec on Apr 24th 2012, 19:36:31
See Original Post

Trife Game profile

Member
5817

Apr 24th 2012, 19:35:20

that trife guy sucks

Jiman Game profile

Member
1199

Apr 24th 2012, 19:35:40

I like that trife guy!

BattleKJ Game profile

Member
1200

Apr 24th 2012, 19:35:51

trife sucks

Trife Game profile

Member
5817

Apr 24th 2012, 19:37:26

Originally posted by BattleKJ:
trife sucks


this!

Pride Game profile

Member
1590

Apr 24th 2012, 19:37:37

Originally posted by hanlong:
Originally posted by Pride:
You say defend yourselves BUT, every war this set your parties planned and were on the offensive.


so you are saying MD never planned to FS LaF last reset? you can say that with a straight face? :P


Aren't we talking this set ? All this talk in your thread seems like there about this set.

LulzSec

Member
25

Apr 24th 2012, 19:37:48

Originally posted by Pride:
You say defend yourselves BUT, every war this set your parties planned and were on the offensive.


+10

Son Goku Game profile

Member
745

Apr 24th 2012, 19:39:32

Originally posted by LulzSec:
Originally posted by Pride:
You say defend yourselves BUT, every war this set your parties planned and were on the offensive.


+10


You're looking at multiple set issues one set at a time. Somehow you can't see this?

LulzSec

Member
25

Apr 24th 2012, 19:42:03

Originally posted by LulzSec:
Session Start: Thu Mar 22 19:39:35 2012
Session Ident: @View
Session Start: Thu Mar 22 17:49:43 2012
Session Ident: #sofcommand
0317:49 * Now talking in #sofcommand
0317:49 * Topic is ' 4 FDP Meeting - Thursday 10PM GT - HERE (DONT
TALK ABOUT OUR SECRET FDP WITH SOL - Hanlong will get upset) '
0317:49 * Set by Flamey on Thu Mar 22 17:42:25


Look at the date. After Ceasefiring with MD they started planning how to "deal" with them and their allies for the immediate set after (this one).

They've (SOF/LAF) FSed SOL and PDM so far.

Just need SOF to wipe ICN and NA off the server.

They'll leave Sanct alone, because they consider them an inactive fluff clan.

Then it's a draw from a hat on who is going to gangbang MD this set.

Alin Game profile

Member
3848

Apr 24th 2012, 19:42:13

Originally posted by Son Goku:
Originally posted by LulzSec:
Originally posted by Pride:
You say defend yourselves BUT, every war this set your parties planned and were on the offensive.


+10


You're looking at multiple set issues one set at a time. Somehow you can't see this?


Well thos logs tops my bad memory and DH deletition ... for today.

NukEvil Game profile

Member
4327

Apr 24th 2012, 19:45:07

I truly hope everyone enjoys playing and dying on LaF's server lol.
I am a troll. Everything I say must be assumed to be said solely to provoke an exaggerated reaction to the current topic. I fully intend to bring absolutely no substance to any discussion, ongoing or otherwise. Conversing with me is pointless.

Trife Game profile

Member
5817

Apr 24th 2012, 19:45:42

Originally posted by Alin:
Originally posted by Son Goku:
Originally posted by LulzSec:
Originally posted by Pride:
You say defend yourselves BUT, every war this set your parties planned and were on the offensive.


+10


You're looking at multiple set issues one set at a time. Somehow you can't see this?


Well thos logs tops my bad memory and DH deletition ... for today.



denied, your forgotten history in laf might not have been as good as this thread, but DH's baleetion wins thread of the month

Taveren Game profile

Member
610

Apr 24th 2012, 19:45:45

occupyAT 1% of alliance leaders control 99% of the lands! Fight the corruption and the EVIL!

The comparison sounded funny in my head...
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Skype: som3thingclassy

LulzSec

Member
25

Apr 24th 2012, 19:47:29

Originally posted by NukEvil:
I truly hope everyone enjoys playing and dying on LaF's server lol.


Tournament server FTW!

Son Goku Game profile

Member
745

Apr 24th 2012, 19:47:36

Originally posted by LulzSec:
Look at the date. After Ceasefiring with MD they started planning how to "deal" with them and their allies for the immediate set after (this one).


Yes, that pact was brutal.

LulzSec

Member
25

Apr 24th 2012, 19:47:38

Originally posted by hanlong:
we never tried to shove pacts down people's throats in order to surprise them ;)


http://tinyurl.com/d3oo4vn

hanlong Game profile

Member
2211

Apr 24th 2012, 19:50:08

Originally posted by LulzSec:
Originally posted by LulzSec:
Session Start: Thu Mar 22 19:39:35 2012
Session Ident: @View
Session Start: Thu Mar 22 17:49:43 2012
Session Ident: #sofcommand
0317:49 * Now talking in #sofcommand
0317:49 * Topic is ' 4 FDP Meeting - Thursday 10PM GT - HERE (DONT
TALK ABOUT OUR SECRET FDP WITH SOL - Hanlong will get upset) '
0317:49 * Set by Flamey on Thu Mar 22 17:42:25


Look at the date. After Ceasefiring with MD they started planning how to "deal" with them and their allies for the immediate set after (this one).

They've (SOF/LAF) FSed SOL and PDM so far.

Just need SOF to wipe ICN and NA off the server.

They'll leave Sanct alone, because they consider them an inactive fluff clan.

Then it's a draw from a hat on who is going to gangbang MD this set.


anoniem, if you don't want three resets of suck, don't have your butt buddies cook up a 3 reset suck pact ;P
Don Hanlong
Don of La Famiglia

LulzSec

Member
25

Apr 24th 2012, 19:52:10

Originally posted by hanlong:
Originally posted by LulzSec:
Originally posted by LulzSec:
Session Start: Thu Mar 22 19:39:35 2012
Session Ident: @View
Session Start: Thu Mar 22 17:49:43 2012
Session Ident: #sofcommand
0317:49 * Now talking in #sofcommand
0317:49 * Topic is ' 4 FDP Meeting - Thursday 10PM GT - HERE (DONT
TALK ABOUT OUR SECRET FDP WITH SOL - Hanlong will get upset) '
0317:49 * Set by Flamey on Thu Mar 22 17:42:25


Look at the date. After Ceasefiring with MD they started planning how to "deal" with them and their allies for the immediate set after (this one).

They've (SOF/LAF) FSed SOL and PDM so far.

Just need SOF to wipe ICN and NA off the server.

They'll leave Sanct alone, because they consider them an inactive fluff clan.

Then it's a draw from a hat on who is going to gangbang MD this set.


anoniem, if you don't want three resets of suck, don't have your butt buddies cook up a 3 reset suck pact ;P


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/...QglF8/s400/propaganda.jpg

locket Game profile

Member
6176

Apr 24th 2012, 19:53:34

Originally posted by LulzSec:
Originally posted by hanlong:
Originally posted by LulzSec:
Originally posted by LulzSec:
Session Start: Thu Mar 22 19:39:35 2012
Session Ident: @View
Session Start: Thu Mar 22 17:49:43 2012
Session Ident: #sofcommand
0317:49 * Now talking in #sofcommand
0317:49 * Topic is ' 4 FDP Meeting - Thursday 10PM GT - HERE (DONT
TALK ABOUT OUR SECRET FDP WITH SOL - Hanlong will get upset) '
0317:49 * Set by Flamey on Thu Mar 22 17:42:25


Look at the date. After Ceasefiring with MD they started planning how to "deal" with them and their allies for the immediate set after (this one).

They've (SOF/LAF) FSed SOL and PDM so far.

Just need SOF to wipe ICN and NA off the server.

They'll leave Sanct alone, because they consider them an inactive fluff clan.

Then it's a draw from a hat on who is going to gangbang MD this set.


anoniem, if you don't want three resets of suck, don't have your butt buddies cook up a 3 reset suck pact ;P


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/...QglF8/s400/propaganda.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtN1YnoL46Q

Go be happy Anoniem.

Karim Game profile

Member
761

Apr 24th 2012, 19:58:10

I went through the whole wall of text just to discover 99% of the times MD got mentioned was by Hanlong.

I guess you have a problem with us, apparently.
-[Panzer Division MD]-

Erian Game profile

Member
702

Apr 24th 2012, 20:00:40

Originally posted by locket:


OH MY GOD! Why haven't I seen this before? It's pure, distilled brilliance! Thank you locket, that made my day! :)

Alin Game profile

Member
3848

Apr 24th 2012, 20:03:24

Is funny how Laf managed to get all the server against Sol and whom-ever our allies are at a given point.

Is funny as hell how some folks are planing to take over a 700 members ( and drooping ) server.

Is not funny to see Mapelson in the other side tought.

maverickmd Game profile

Member
730

Apr 24th 2012, 20:05:51

Originally posted by hanlong:
Originally posted by Pride:
You say defend yourselves BUT, every war this set your parties planned and were on the offensive.


so you are saying MD never planned to FS LaF last reset? you can say that with a straight face? :P



Correct. We never would have FS a fully war prepped LaF, with 70 tyrannys, knowledge of our FS time, 80% more total NW than us.
Correct :)

H4xOr WaNgEr Game profile

Forum Moderator
1932

Apr 24th 2012, 20:07:10

I only got about 1/3 of the way through that before I just got bored of it an stopped reading, but from what I read I did not see anything offensive at all. So.. can someone point out to me exactly what is offensive in the logs?

Alin Game profile

Member
3848

Apr 24th 2012, 20:10:06

Get that text into a Word.doc and search by " Sol or MD or Pdm or Evo"

I hope that answers your question.

LulzSec

Member
25

Apr 24th 2012, 20:14:36

Originally posted by Alin:
Get that text into a Word.doc and search by " Sol or MD or Pdm or Evo"

I hope that answers your question.


Search PDM, EVO, MD, SOL, ICN, NA, SANCT, IMAG, RAGE etc

That should cover it, unless I missed anyone out.

H4xOr WaNgEr Game profile

Forum Moderator
1932

Apr 24th 2012, 20:19:32

that would cover a majority of the logs, as I said I didn't see anything offensive in the first third and those alliances were mentioned plenty.

Discussing other alliances isn't inherently offensive, and most of what I saw was merely planning contingencies because "PDM might FS us OOP" etc. Planning for contingencies is not offensive. So I'm still waiting for someone to point out the offensive part of the log.

LulzSec

Member
25

Apr 24th 2012, 20:25:41

Originally posted by H4xOr WaNgEr:
that would cover a majority of the logs, as I said I didn't see anything offensive in the first third and those alliances were mentioned plenty.

Discussing other alliances isn't inherently offensive, and most of what I saw was merely planning contingencies because "PDM might FS us OOP" etc. Planning for contingencies is not offensive. So I'm still waiting for someone to point out the offensive part of the log.


Change your nick to DJ Scratch and Sniff, as your spinning techniques are immense.


http://b1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/...10/18/19/2110679181_l.jpg

Trife Game profile

Member
5817

Apr 24th 2012, 20:28:25

Originally posted by LulzSec:
Originally posted by H4xOr WaNgEr:
that would cover a majority of the logs, as I said I didn't see anything offensive in the first third and those alliances were mentioned plenty.

Discussing other alliances isn't inherently offensive, and most of what I saw was merely planning contingencies because "PDM might FS us OOP" etc. Planning for contingencies is not offensive. So I'm still waiting for someone to point out the offensive part of the log.


Change your nick to DJ Scratch and Sniff, as your spinning techniques are immense.


http://b1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/...10/18/19/2110679181_l.jpg


You remind me of a broken record player, so you're spinnin' as well..

SPIN SPIN SPIN

Alin Game profile

Member
3848

Apr 24th 2012, 20:30:44

Wanger I think you are blind.

If those logs contained Laf instade of Sol/Md/Pdm etc - Laf would have to droop pacts and FS for like 10 resets.

But of course you are going to play that "what`s wrong with the logs" card.

Purposeful1 Game profile

Member
546

Apr 24th 2012, 20:34:06

Originally posted by maverickmd:
We're still the same old MDers =P


Everyone told us you didn't love us anymore. We got all worked up and scared and sought therapy. Now we feel a little better. =)
Purposeful1

hanlong Game profile

Member
2211

Apr 24th 2012, 20:39:52

Originally posted by Karim:
I went through the whole wall of text just to discover 99% of the times MD got mentioned was by Hanlong.

I guess you have a problem with us, apparently.


i never had a problem with MD until you backstabbed us :P
Don Hanlong
Don of La Famiglia

LulzSec

Member
25

Apr 24th 2012, 20:40:07

Originally posted by Trife:
Originally posted by LulzSec:
Originally posted by H4xOr WaNgEr:
that would cover a majority of the logs, as I said I didn't see anything offensive in the first third and those alliances were mentioned plenty.

Discussing other alliances isn't inherently offensive, and most of what I saw was merely planning contingencies because "PDM might FS us OOP" etc. Planning for contingencies is not offensive. So I'm still waiting for someone to point out the offensive part of the log.


Change your nick to DJ Scratch and Sniff, as your spinning techniques are immense.


http://b1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/...10/18/19/2110679181_l.jpg


You remind me of a broken record player, so you're spinnin' as well..

SPIN SPIN SPIN


What exactly is it that PDM did to LaF and SoF? You sound like the type of player who hates being gang banged when it's your own alliance, but is more than willing to sit in on conversations where other alliance's plan the demise of whoever they feel like.

This is more than a "DP conversation", but keep trying to down play it. The logs are there for all so that they can see each and every one of you in your true light.

anoniem Game profile

Member
2881

Apr 24th 2012, 20:44:43

Originally posted by hanlong:
Originally posted by Karim:
I went through the whole wall of text just to discover 99% of the times MD got mentioned was by Hanlong.

I guess you have a problem with us, apparently.


i never had a problem with MD until you backstabbed us :P


Full. Of. fluff.

Kind regards,
Anoneim (A special spelling for a special person)
re(ally)tired

Son Goku Game profile

Member
745

Apr 24th 2012, 20:44:55

Originally posted by Alin:
Wanger I think you are blind.

If those logs contained Laf instade of Sol/Md/Pdm etc - Laf would have to droop pacts and FS for like 10 resets.

But of course you are going to play that "what`s wrong with the logs" card.


No, we're going to explain the difference.

Logs 1: Dropping FDP, using a ceasefire (in goodwill) to beg for a pact that includes a loophole (which you then brag about) to hit one alliance. This chat involved 3 people and the rest of their respective alliances were intentionally left out of/lied to in order to hide their true intentions.

vs

Logs 2: Organizing pacts, mention of WR grabbing (farming) if no pact, few individuals expressing their dislike for other alliances. There's no grand conspiracy and the majority of all heads from each alliance are involved.

Hopefully this helps you, we've already been shown your massive memory loss today.

Karim Game profile

Member
761

Apr 24th 2012, 20:47:11

Originally posted by hanlong:
Originally posted by Karim:
I went through the whole wall of text just to discover 99% of the times MD got mentioned was by Hanlong.

I guess you have a problem with us, apparently.


i never had a problem with MD until you backstabbed us :P


All comes to my mind is "lol".....
-[Panzer Division MD]-

Alin Game profile

Member
3848

Apr 24th 2012, 20:47:15

Hopefully this helps you, we've already been shown your massive memory loss today


You guys are full of hate ; something i am not.

But i`ll stay here long therm and shove that hate of yours down your throats.

Have a good night!

Kalick Game profile

Member
699

Apr 24th 2012, 20:49:06

The paranoia in those logs is kinda funny. For some reason everybody not involved in the chat is viewed as being against everybody in the chat. This game is too small for coalition wars.

Why do people keep trying to force the game to be side vs side? And that goes for everybody, not just the people in the above log. With the size of the game the way it is, alliances should be forging their own paths in order to keep the game dynamic and interesting. Setting up "coalition wars" (I guess this isn't a formal coalition, but that is just semantics) that last for a years+ is no fun. How many times can LaF fight SoL and still find it fun?

Jiman Game profile

Member
1199

Apr 24th 2012, 20:49:13

I remember offering Omega, Sof, Rival and Laf a unap. That would of been a good way of taken care of SOL without dragging allies into more unneeded conflict.

I guess that only Omega wants to stick to netting according to the chat?

>.>

<.<

*licks son goku*

hanlong Game profile

Member
2211

Apr 24th 2012, 20:51:08

Kalick: then why did you guys interfere with our peace chats to end this 2 resets ago? if MD never offered to jump sides, we would've all moved on to a new chapter by now
Don Hanlong
Don of La Famiglia

Reckless Game profile

Member
1190

Apr 24th 2012, 20:51:21

Is LAF trying to dominate the server?

hanlong Game profile

Member
2211

Apr 24th 2012, 20:52:13

Originally posted by anoniem:
Originally posted by hanlong:
Originally posted by Karim:
I went through the whole wall of text just to discover 99% of the times MD got mentioned was by Hanlong.

I guess you have a problem with us, apparently.


i never had a problem with MD until you backstabbed us :P


Full. Of. fluff.

Kind regards,
Anoneim (A special spelling for a special person)


stop logging back and forth between your two forum accounts ;P do you enjoy talking to yourself normally?
Don Hanlong
Don of La Famiglia

Kalick Game profile

Member
699

Apr 24th 2012, 20:52:27

I don't speak for MD/Arsenal, hanlong. Pretty sure I mentioned that what I said applies to everybody, not just those in the above chat.

Alin Game profile

Member
3848

Apr 24th 2012, 20:52:49

Those alliances don`t want pacts Jiman. They want to war and farm ( aka WarGain ).

Son Goku Game profile

Member
745

Apr 24th 2012, 20:53:56

Originally posted by Kalick:
The paranoia in those logs is kinda funny. For some reason everybody not involved in the chat is viewed as being against everybody in the chat. This game is too small for coalition wars.


It's not paranoia. As a long time alliance leader I'm sure you're very accustomed to playing out every possible scenario and having a plan for each one.

hanlong Game profile

Member
2211

Apr 24th 2012, 20:54:46

Originally posted by Reckless:
Is LAF trying to dominate the server?


nope, we just wanted to netgain.

MD however wanted to dominate the server 2 resets ago, hence why all this gayness started in the first place. they created the "PROM" coalition while tapping into Evo/SOL help while retaining SoF as their FDP. the idea i'm assuming was with all sides locked up they can isolate LaF and assume sole dominance over the rest of the server.

we don't want to "wargain". we want to netgain. you guys forced war on us 2 resets ago, and we had to make the best out of it. hence wargaining. we are more than happy to do normal netgaining =)
Don Hanlong
Don of La Famiglia

H4xOr WaNgEr Game profile

Forum Moderator
1932

Apr 24th 2012, 20:55:28

once again, I've only read the first third, but I didn't see anything in there saying that sof was gunning for PDM etc. They said that they EXPECT PDM to attack them (I believe they mentioned either an OOP war or an AB FS later on). SoF also mentioned a little later that they EXPECTED to be tied up with either PDM or RD.

And the difference between these logs and the ones LaF posted last reset are: a) none of the alliances there were planning to dump an FDP and b) none of them were currently negotiating a long term peace deal. It is a completely different context.

However, if a lot more trashtalking or something occurs later in the logs (aka something that is actually offensive) then you should point it out to those of us who can' tbe bothered to spend 30 mins reading all of that :P

Jiman Game profile

Member
1199

Apr 24th 2012, 20:57:09

Great way to netgain by having all your allies (and yourself) a unap with SOL just to war us.


Best netting strat ever. But of course your plan was to put an alliance into a position where you can just farm them until your happy to netgain with all the land you can eat with the new restart changes :O

hanlong Game profile

Member
2211

Apr 24th 2012, 20:58:12

i apologize if LaF ruined your plans, you could've just left us alone and kept our FDP and we would've netgained last reset. you could've played your dumb world domination game with SOL and whatever.

you felt it was cute to drag LaF into this, so we had to make the best out of the situation you guys dealt us.

and we will continue to make the best out of what you guys try to deal us. i don't see anything wrong about it. if you want us to not war, leave us alone and we'll netgain as we have done for 10+ years.
Don Hanlong
Don of La Famiglia