As you may know, I've taken on the task of continuing to clean up and expand the content of the EarthEmpires wiki, and there is a brick wall that I've run into. Namely, my memory is junk, and a lot of data has not been filled in on older alliances and players that either I never knew or don't know much about.

For example, the following alliances have no pages associated with them:
Camelot
Monks
No Limit Soldiers
EoS
Berserk
Exodus
The Avengers
Crimson Knights
Army of Darkness
PoW
Quebec
Self Indulgent Angels

If you are so inclined, please consider taking a few minutes and updating the pages for these alliances. If you don't feel like formatting things nicely, send me the content through forum PM and I'll be glad to create the page myself.

For a whole list of pages that need to be created, visit the following link:
http://wiki.earthempires.com/...x.php/Special:WantedPages

As always, if you need help with anything wiki-oriented, feel free to drop me a line in #wiki on irc.earthempires.com or through forum PM.

-Azz

bonus

up

or if anybody has any blurbs already written up about them

Can I make a wiki entry for my name? lol

sure thing. :P

A while back someone made wiki entries for all current Earth players.

I'll do EoS and Monks.. sometime when I got time over next bit.

up!

ttt :P

The Voices and jj are wanted pages? By who?

"wanted" pages simply means that somebody created a link in an existing wiki page to a nonexistent article.
so there are a couple ways around it, either edit out all of the dead links, or create the page. i prefer to do the latter, as i don't really like deleting information.

please update sol,pdm,evo,rage,md's page for this reset losing a war to the SoF/LaF WARMACHINE!

<< does not have a wiki page.

TaSk1: you forget the turning of the tide for your side by RD.

Drow i have irc logs.

Sperm heads: we know this is day 1 of war, but were gonna lose.
Other sperm heads: true story.


Shortened to avoid tl;dr

no worries just remember it was 3 alliances vs 5 alliances, oh and we won ... via TOTAL DOMINATION!

except that numerically your 3 alliances were more than our 5, and that 1 of them waited until our members were all destocked before jumping in, and that our 5th alliance (8 members) jumped in SOLELY because you called more buddies in, because your side had started losing.

We have LaF crying about how they were hit when they weren't warprepped or saving turns, and claiming that they knew they and sof were going to war this set regardless... seems a lot like spinning on your sides' behalf here.
We lost, but only because RD jumped in like cowardly jackals. I wouldn't call that domination in ANY way, shape or form.

you ignorant fool, how is it our fault we have the number go and recruit more members we worked hard to get our numbers up where as you guys didn't sol knows how to recruit just because you sit on your arses and do nothing thats your own fault. RD had there own beef with MD the timing was good for RD so they punched holes in MD, just like the set before when evo jumped LaF when it was md and sol vs LaF fair numbers, plus you guys had 2 out of 3 of the fs's you blind shot LaF we hit sol/evo in fdp, md and pdm hit us in fdp. so 4 on 2 alliances already a gang bang, so we call in one other to make it an even playing field then you bring another one to try and tip the scales, but you called rage in who did sweet fluff all, they were just added to the dead tally.

and it was definitely total domination go check out the war stats and cry yourself to sleep, we served you an ass whipping with a cherry on top.

task: a gangbang implies massively superior numbers between multiple alliances. LaF and SoF hitting RAGE would be a gangbang for example. Enough alliances to get even numbers is NOT a gangbang.
Furhter, LaF wasn't blindsided as you put it. They knew they were warring this set, and so did you. they just got outplayed as to when. Further, it also shows that neither SOF nor LaF were paying attention if LaF were caught by surprise, as looking at SoL/Evo, you should have seen they were prepping for an early war.
Oh, and right up until RD joined the war, the stats were all in our favour, not yours.
That says it all really.

no no no you've got it all wrong idiot, the only thing you said right was multiple alliances eg 5 vs 3 the rest your conjuring up yourself, fair is 1 vs 1 or 2 vs 2 and so on, your hating on RD but their war was with MD they didn't hit, pdm or sol or evo ... much ... so what are you crying about, it's like a chess game you have to have your pacts nice and tight or you leave yourself with holes in your defense, and yip that's right, you left a hole in your defense.

Check mate.

oh ffs. take this to another thread.

azz kikr just del there posts =]

I don't have moderating power on this board :)

Just updated Servant's most Incompetent troll rankings.

Task1 is the only one that made it:)

annnnd up

Task: so a 100 member alliance deciding to hit a 10 member alliance would be "fair" in your books?
Thank you for demonstrating your epic level of mental retardation.

Yes, you're right, RD DID only hit MD, but that's STILL enough to turn the tide of a war, and it doesn't surprise me that you thick enough not to recognise that.

You're also correct that tactically RD was a mess up on our side of the fence, and that it should have been handled better and wasn't.

Going to point out though, that RD wouldn't have ever lifted a finger against MD if MD hadn't been otherwise occupied.

look mate it wouldn't have mattered if the shoe was on the other foot and if sol and evo had the numbers on us membership numbers sway every set it's up to your recruitment team to do their job you can't BLAME us for having a strong membership base you should blame your recruitment team for being so lazy and fluff.

you put two alliances on 1 that's called a gang bang cause your ganging up. 1 vs 1 is fair if you need another alliance to help you out then you can't fight your own battles,what you need to do is to learn shut your mouth more or you get taken to the war room table.

task: you should tell that to your new found best buds RD... had to wait until MD's back was turned, and embroiled in a war with SoF and LaF, and destocked, before they felt they could sink the boots in, because otherwise they couldn't win.

Further, it's not always about recruitment being lazy/fluff as you so casually put it. Sometimes people decide they wish a different play style to the alliance they are currently in, OR, actually go and retire. Pretty much every single person still playing earth is a vet, and the overall population base of the game is getting smaller and smaller. I'm not going to take away that SoF and LaF are doing well, far from it, you guys have better than 25% of the remaining earth playerbase between the two of you.

And just for consistency then. 2 brand new, 10 member alliances band together to FS LaF because they are doing their usual "you're smaller than us so we're going to farm you into the ground and jump so you can't retal" tactic. so 20 countries total, attacking LaF's what 70? 80? are you going to call that a gangbang too?
You sir, are either an incredibly bad troll, or a buffoon. your choice.
Gangbangs have always been about multiple alliances using overwhelming numbers on a numerically inferior opponent.
so 3 60 member alliances ganging up on a single 80 member alliance would be a gangbang. because it's multiple alliances with overwhelming numbers.

With some help from Drow, Camelot's history is now up on the Earth wiki!
http://wiki.earthempires.com/index.php/Camelot

We're always looking for more contributors, so if you have something else to add to the wiki, go for it, or let me know what it is and I'll help you get it added

up up up

ttt :)

and up we go

pfft... the Earth-Wiki is wourthless without my mug on there.. the most unimportant important personality.

so put it on there :P it's a wiki. go log in with your forum account and create your own page

I'm too boring....