Jun 16th 2013, 20:25:31
Was looking for it.
Judging by some of the newly formed rules we have within MD and the ass kickings we've received from SoF over the past few sets.
Guess I'll start it... who is up for an asian massage from lil ol' dittie?
------------------------
From: MD/dittie (X)
Previous Message:
It bleeds honesty. I wish it was sarcasm.
Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: AT post
From: MD/Taveren (President XXX)
Previous Message:
Because it bleeds of sarcasm.
Reply to: Re: Re: Re: AT post
From: MD/dittie (X)
Previous Message:
My post on AT is actually praising SoF and ridiculing MD.
How you can even translate a single part of what I wrote to represent a negative tone towards SoF astounds me.
Reply to: Re: Re: AT post
From: MD/Taveren (President XXX)
Previous Message:
Your AT posts represented another poke at their pride as a representative of MD. It further sours their attitude toward us for no benefit at all.
What your post actually accomplish? What do you expect to come out of a jab like that? If anything you just stacked their hand and made it harder for us to push that retal through.
Reply to: Re: AT post
From: MD/dittie (X)
Previous Message:
Explain to me what you think my AT post represents?
Reply to: AT post
From: MD/Taveren (President XXX)
Previous Message:
No head responded to your post on AWR. Clean up your attitude on AT as this is part of the exact reason we don't have a pact with them.
Judging by some of the newly formed rules we have within MD and the ass kickings we've received from SoF over the past few sets.
Guess I'll start it... who is up for an asian massage from lil ol' dittie?
------------------------
From: MD/dittie (X)
Previous Message:
It bleeds honesty. I wish it was sarcasm.
Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: AT post
From: MD/Taveren (President XXX)
Previous Message:
Because it bleeds of sarcasm.
Reply to: Re: Re: Re: AT post
From: MD/dittie (X)
Previous Message:
My post on AT is actually praising SoF and ridiculing MD.
How you can even translate a single part of what I wrote to represent a negative tone towards SoF astounds me.
Reply to: Re: Re: AT post
From: MD/Taveren (President XXX)
Previous Message:
Your AT posts represented another poke at their pride as a representative of MD. It further sours their attitude toward us for no benefit at all.
What your post actually accomplish? What do you expect to come out of a jab like that? If anything you just stacked their hand and made it harder for us to push that retal through.
Reply to: Re: AT post
From: MD/dittie (X)
Previous Message:
Explain to me what you think my AT post represents?
Reply to: AT post
From: MD/Taveren (President XXX)
Previous Message:
No head responded to your post on AWR. Clean up your attitude on AT as this is part of the exact reason we don't have a pact with them.
Edited By: dittie on Jun 16th 2013, 21:29:51. Reason: becuz ppl cant read
See Original Post
See Original Post

