Originally
posted by
Soviet:
Would've been better without syko leading
I don't know what is going on in the enemy war room but nothing can be blamed on Syko. Any problem with warchats will always rest with those responsible for the warchats, the Heads of War from the Alliances involved. Syko is not a Head of War, he is a subordinate.
The CS from LAF, Imag and Elders was not very good and the target selection was poor, this got you off to a bad start which meant you were always trying to play catch up. When iScode took over the chats he got you right back in to the fight, but after the weekend was over the warchats became slow and the target selection poor. There was also no apparent strategy behind the war effort.
LAF's activity was really good, but they really took a pounding from us and their hitrate decreased as a result. LAF's countries were amazing and as a result of this we had to target them hard from the outset.
I have said it often that war has changed a lot since the SoF/SOL wars of the past year as each set warring was taken to a new level. Neither LAF, Imag or Elders leadership have encountered warring such as this and that is evident even in your killruns to date. To be honest I wouldn't say that it was a bad effort on the part of LAF, Imag and Elders but it is clear that the war leadership are not up to speed with the current warring methods. SoF/MD are up to speed and they are just putting out an amazing war effort.
EE Patron