Nov 8th 2011, 9:51:47
Some points i take out of this if i was PDM:
1.) Why should PDM have to contact another FA other than Thomas? surely what Thomas says is representative of Sanct's official position? If he was authorised to do FA, then his opinion is Sanct's opinion, and PDM have every right to act/react/whatever based on that assumption. It is not their duty to find "the right" sanct FA. It is sanct's duty to provide competent FA's.
2.) I think it is entirely unfair that you expect PDM to act in a certain way, and yet expect Thomas to act in a completly different way.
3.) You admit here that Thomas blatently lied in his FA dealings with PDM, where he threatened war, especially if he had no intention of bringing about war. This means Thomas cannot do FA in the future for Sanct as no-one can take anything he says to be truthful. + i doubt any alliance will be prepared to deal with him, knowing that other Sanct FA's will handle the issue much more sensibly.
I personally think that the issue at hand for sanct here is that you have allowed people who are inadequate for the job at hand to take over important positions in Sanct, and the alliance is suffering as a result. However i can see you may not ahve any choice if there is no-one within who is prepared to step up instead of someone like thomas, or no-one who can. I feel for you, as it is a predicament i am completly familiar with myself.
As for LCN & PDM. I tend to agree that surely PDM would know that LCN will hit them in defence of Sanct, and to have any issue with it is stupid of course. But to be fair to PDM i don't think i've seen any of them have any issue with it on the boards? no idea if privately they been bleating like sheep:p
These things happen, it's just part of the game. On the plus side i think PDM are prob the sort of guys that when next set rolls around, a new set is a new set:p and will prob not have any issues:p