Verified:

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 10th 2013, 6:53:00

tldr;

and holy fluff are you on drugs, or exactly why would you put so much time into this?

wow

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 5th 2013, 6:19:03

Originally posted by Detmer:
Originally posted by Vic:
we are taking all possible actions to rid our alliance of any cheaters, remote or blatant.


I'll give you a hint on where to start. If someone's display name in the RD site starts with "Mr." they should be gone.


How about no, and go fluff yourself? That's quite enough of your demanding, uppity bullfluff. I hope you do get to do an audit of everything RD and find out that the frenzy you've worked yourself up into over the past few years is so silly that you're just a hot mess now. :)

Tell me, when you find out that I'm completely squeaky clean, will you come back here and apologize for maligning me (and whoever else you deem to be squeaky clean) and every other color as though we're all part of a single brain working together to cheat endlessly?

I would hope so, but I definitely wouldn't hold my breath.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 3rd 2013, 9:05:06

Neither do I. Find one piece of dirt on me. Even one. I'm sure between all the haters, surely someone knows of me doing something immoral in EE.

Until then, you're a sore loser. I'm not surprised. You never experienced anything else until you joined SOF.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 3rd 2013, 8:11:45

Originally posted by iScode:
Originally posted by Mr Snow:
Originally posted by tellarion:
Originally posted by martian:
I should also add that it's only about 1/3rd correct and most of those were people openly admitting that is who they were.
Some of the RDers used multiple colours. Some of the colours used multiple RDers over the years.
This is a nice attempt at troll though.


The screenshots are a nice addition though. Good to see nobody in RD leadership thinks Silver is guilty and he's not being punished in any way internally..



tellarion, I would've hoped you were smart enough to realize that there was more discussion going on than what was posted to google docs, that there were possibly discussions of moving forward in a manner that didn't include Copper or Silver, that possibly the failtroll OP of this thread intentionally didn't include anything that would have shown the fact that many/almost all of us had zero knowledge of what some have been accused of, and that said failtroll OP of this thread intentionally wouldn't have included the items that showed some of us showing extreme displeasure with what had occurred, and said failtroll OP absolutely wouldn't have posted anything that showed us working to do something positive about it. I know you and the rest of AT are great at conspiracy theories, so that shouldn't be too far of a stretch, right?

Rub those braincells together and make a spark.


DANCE RD DANCE
SPIN SPIN SPIN


no one believes you, if they do they are retarded


Sorry, iChode. That msg was meant for tellarion and others with at least two brain cells.

Now run along and lead imag into oblivion. Oh wait...you already did that. My bad.

Btw, it was great fun ending imag's existence from either RD or Monsters. ;)

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 2nd 2013, 18:50:21

I can't post snippets, they're gone.

I didn't play under an alias, unless you consider Snow an alias. Everybody in Monsters knew I was from RD.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 2nd 2013, 18:16:02

Originally posted by tellarion:
Originally posted by martian:
I should also add that it's only about 1/3rd correct and most of those were people openly admitting that is who they were.
Some of the RDers used multiple colours. Some of the colours used multiple RDers over the years.
This is a nice attempt at troll though.


The screenshots are a nice addition though. Good to see nobody in RD leadership thinks Silver is guilty and he's not being punished in any way internally..



tellarion, I would've hoped you were smart enough to realize that there was more discussion going on than what was posted to google docs, that there were possibly discussions of moving forward in a manner that didn't include Copper or Silver, that possibly the failtroll OP of this thread intentionally didn't include anything that would have shown the fact that many/almost all of us had zero knowledge of what some have been accused of, and that said failtroll OP of this thread intentionally wouldn't have included the items that showed some of us showing extreme displeasure with what had occurred, and said failtroll OP absolutely wouldn't have posted anything that showed us working to do something positive about it. I know you and the rest of AT are great at conspiracy theories, so that shouldn't be too far of a stretch, right?

Rub those braincells together and make a spark.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 2nd 2013, 8:09:26

I agree with Vic's main post above.

And justtaint, though you may not trust Silver for whatever reason you have, I still do.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 2nd 2013, 7:43:13

I've learned some things from this thread:

1. The OP has a serious boner for all of RD, good and bad.

2. The OP is incompetent at even piecing together known information in the public realm, such as AT. (see Mr. Titanium)

3. I'm apparently ex-Monsters...good to know. You're a genius. I played there as Mr. Snow for quite a few resets. Genius detective work there, Sherlock. Isn't this one a little too obvious to be true?

4. My knowledge of Colors' identities is woefully wrong. But then again, I never put any effort into finding out a Color's identity; if I was told who someone was, so be it. Funny how a nobody would care so much, yet be such an obvious idiot.

5. Which brings me to #5. Mr. Orange is dumb.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Oct 8th 2013, 9:55:31

Sorry to see you LC go. We weren't the best of friends, but I had a lot of respect from knowing about just some of what LC was going through and still being able to soldier on in life.

Feels like a general has left the field.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Aug 11th 2013, 5:45:19

Don't worry, nobody would let you in charge of leadership, scodey. What if you quit in the middle of a losing war again? That kind of ruins alliances, I heard. I'm surprised they let you FA. I suppose you're good for stirring up fluff, at least, when the adults go on vacation each set.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Aug 7th 2013, 7:41:54

Originally posted by euglaf:
honestly, if i could edit the scores sheet so hao2 finishes 1 nw lower than sodawater i would do it :)


Why don't you ask hlw to do it for you? He still plays in laf, right? ;)

ZING

Mr Snow

Member
136

Jul 9th 2013, 7:49:41

Legal kill or not, that cop was a fluff. There was no need to shoot it.

- A taser would have worked. Yes, it would have. Unless the cops in LA have those single shot only tasers. Oh, they don't.
- That was not a huge rottweiler. Unless you're a fluff.
- It was only one dog. Don't be a fluff.
- There were plenty of cops around to subdue a dog like that. fluff.
- Or one of the other cops could have grabbed its leash.
- It was hardly in attack mode. If you think that's dog attack mode, stop posting in this thread. It was agitated, and trying to protect it's owner, and very unsure of itself the whole time. A dog in attack mode would have gone for the attack immediately, not jumped around a bit and snapped a few times.
- The only life threatened/taken was that of the dog. No officers were ever in danger of dying. Give me a break. Overreact much? Trigger happy much?

I'm not a rottweiler fan by any means, but there was little to no justification for killing that dog. Yes, the owner was an idiot for not rolling up the windows, among other things.

It's my opinion that that particular cop lacks the quick thinking brain and good judgment necessary to perform his job well. What a dumbass.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Jun 6th 2013, 7:23:36

One of your turdly members did a gaggle of harmful spy ops after I hit you the first time. So I hit you again.

What's the big deal?

Have fun, I'm not sure if I'll be playing.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Jun 5th 2013, 7:47:14

I predict a lot more hate coming my way in the near future, both ingame and inforum.

I do feel a bit bad, because Monsters have been nothing but great. This is, of course, in the event this causes any spillover griefers to the rest of Monsters. It's also possible that I might have thought twice about retalling the multitude of harmful spy ops from #1174 had I seen what an uproar (an attention whore uproar, but an uproar nonetheless) I had caused with just one grab.

Then again, maybe it was my last chance to slap imag around. Even better knowing it's galleri. :)

Mr Snow

Member
136

Jun 3rd 2013, 7:49:37

It's only boring if you run slow or don't cover much distance....or if you run in boring places.

Try harder.

Mr Snow

Member
136

May 21st 2013, 6:57:19

I never understand why people want to track their routes with their phones. Every single person I know who does that always gives a disclaimer when they explain how they track their training; must not be very serious training.

Get a Garmin 910XT. Incredibly useful.

Mr Snow

Member
136

May 20th 2013, 4:47:51

I guess you're using a phone to track your activity? Or do you use a Garmin and don't like the Garmin Connect site?

Mr Snow

Member
136

Apr 25th 2013, 6:25:09

Originally posted by anoniem:
Originally posted by iScode:
It was much more than 1 fa package, not to mention the untags that got FA before tagging up.


WHY, hasn't anybody mentioned the iScode tag-jumping FA debacle of a few resets ago? I mean aren't you all keeping tabs!?!?!

Sheesh.


Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooool. You mean the set where he quit as president of itards when the war he started for a stupid reason didn't go his way and tagged up his country in sof and turned his back on his alliance?

I don't remember that.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Mar 16th 2013, 6:29:31

Oh, and you turds killed me while I was at work late. Damn work.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Mar 16th 2013, 6:28:24

I was aware of where he scurried off to after losing the last war. I also don't see how I addressed anything as though he was in imag. The fluffing and moaning comment deserved a reply, considering the horribly harsh nature...oh, and the fact that it's a load of crap. No one is fluffing and moaning.

And you, galleri, posted the comment about giving your members justice. Hence, the post could be to you too.

Did you just get out of bed? It must be early in Failandia.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Mar 15th 2013, 7:13:58

Newsflash, there is no value in pacting itards unless you don't want to deal with their random dart-board of FS target retardedness (reference: every alliance in e2025). Or, the instigatory topfeeds on countries you deem not 'adequately defended' (reference: RD a couple sets ago, as well as many others).

Where's all the fluffing and moaning 'like a little whore' you speak of? I don't see it from anyone, including the 'tards.

So much for giving itard members justice. Unless itards call justice losing another war.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Mar 7th 2013, 4:38:03

So, basically you're a bunch of idiots who have no idea who to war or why, and just make up an excuse when the dart hits the board?

K, thx for clearing that up. Though, I had my suspicions.

I'm sure last set was exactly the same... *rolls eyes* haha

Mr Snow

Member
136

Jan 11th 2013, 7:02:21

If nobody mentioned Slapaho...

Mr Snow

Member
136

Jan 11th 2013, 7:00:33

mrford is strong with the logic in this thread. Maybe it's just because of the quality of the opponents. :)

I am surprised this is even headline quality news. Oh wait, there is a big push going on by the obama admin to try to tighten gun laws, and the media is more than willing to try to sway citizens' opinions. Now I remember why it was on CNN all day today.

I wonder how many people were stabbed to death today. Shouldn't that be headline news? The kid didn't even kill anybody.

Anti-gunners using this as a rallying point is idiotic.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Dec 30th 2012, 21:28:21

Or a brain.

Btw, I thought I was FA'ing an untagged country. If it turns out he was actually tagged ResDogs when he was FA'd I would like to even the whining a little bit and offer the same to imag's countries.

On a similar note, I find it somewhat amusing that it's okay for imag to plan a war before the set begins, and recruit players from other alliances (lol a reunion set, that's always funny), meanwhile it's such an unhonorable thing that the alliance being FS'd that is pretty unprepared for war is not allowed to recruit anybody starting the second war is declared. How many 'old members' that 'just wanted to war (hate RD)' did you get for just this set? Then you whine and cry that RD gets one decent-sized country midset.

Give me a break. Stop coming up with pathetic reasons for losing a war. You're imag and you're used to it. Where's the 'we love to get pwned' spirit I'm so used to? :)

Mr Snow

Member
136

Dec 22nd 2012, 19:27:26

At least he didn't say it's not over until the fat lady sings.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Dec 21st 2012, 8:29:57

ichode's been off of AT for practically a week, and this is the best war dec he can come up with? Rambling, and boring.

2/10

Mr Snow

Member
136

Dec 15th 2012, 9:06:14

Yeah, locket, cause owning a gun is a great comparison to say, raping.

You might be taken seriously if your arguments weren't so emotionally driven and ridiculously stupid.

A ban on guns (in the form of no concealed carry) has been shown to lead to an increase in violent crime. More lax laws on guns (allowing concealed carry) has been shown to lead to a decrease in violent crime. You can ignore it all you want, but this great fact is not going away, and didn't take manipulation of the stats to reach that conclusion.

Whine, flail your arms all you want about it, state with certainty all you want that guns are only meant to kill people, that nobody should ever own an assault weapon, and the fact that you're wrong will remain.

Enjoy life with blinders.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Dec 7th 2012, 8:38:09

The Note 2 has a larger screen and smaller overall size than my last phone. I'm getting one whenever I decide to plunk down the $300+. Definitely get the insurance on this one.

The Note 2 is better than the S3...isn't there an S4 or something better coming out soon anyway? I'd wait for that rather than get the S3 now. And the Note 2 isn't a tablet, the Nexus 7 is.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Dec 4th 2012, 18:37:11

Only crest23, locket, and Pontius Pirate continue to get baited so easily by such an obvious troll thread, though a glorious troll thread as it succeeded so well. You should all hang out, I bet that would be a great party. :)

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 16th 2012, 7:09:13

Sidebar: Why does dental insurance coverage always seem to be rather fluffty? :)

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 16th 2012, 7:02:37

No, I didn't miss it. But...Obama got 95% or maybe more of the black vote in 2008...so based on what you said Obama got the benefit of a racially tinged vote? Is it only racially tinged when democrats or black people do it, but it's just plain old racism if Republicans are involved? lol

Suggesting and generalizing that all Republicans are behind all of these heinous things you spewed, is tantamount to the height of idiocy, if not the totem on top. That would be like suggesting that all Democrats are as stupid as Biden, or that all democrats are like the Obamaphone or the "obama's going to pay my mortgage' ladies, or that the entire Democratic party tried to convince the world that Republicans were going to steal the election through the Diebold (brand ?) voting machines (that actually turned out to give Obama >99% of the vote in many places and so the Democrats dropped the issue after the election), etc. Tango?

But, I'm sure that helps your argument in your head, and if you and other people parrot it enough, more people will believe you. Win-win for you? Unfortunately, you will not convince me that just because someone is a Republican, they are like the ones you mentioned above. It goes both ways; I also don't think all Democrats are as I mentioned above.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 15th 2012, 17:42:04

Wait, wait... are you saying that Republicans don't care about black people? Are you channeling your inner Kanye?

I know a lot of Republicans that would be extremely offended by what you said, and have not 'forsaken a whole group of people'. It's quite the opposite, the 'whole group of people' (it's ok, you can say black people) has forsaken everybody but the black candidate. In 2008 it was nearly a polling margin of error away from 100% black people voting for Obama; in 2012, a few wayward % points of black people voted for Romney.

How could you possibly say that's not racist? I am fairly certain that's a logical conclusion.

Imagine if 90% of white people voted for Romney...there would be serious issues with calling white people racist and Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson would make a lot of money. :P

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 15th 2012, 6:35:58

Originally posted by Cougar:
Originally posted by Mr Snow:
Out of curiosity, has anybody mentioned the elephant in the room yet?

Would Obama have been reelected if black people had a more normal voting distribution among the candidates? Like say the same split as white men, or white women (obviously favoring Obama rather than Romney)?

I haven't seen any specific articles or news clips on that. Curious.


Are you suggesting that black people would have voted for the republican candidate if not for the fact there was a black candidate?

Nice attempt at injecting racism where none exists.


Um, right. That's not racism. At all. *chuckle*

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 14th 2012, 5:11:12

Out of curiosity, has anybody mentioned the elephant in the room yet?

Would Obama have been reelected if black people had a more normal voting distribution among the candidates? Like say the same split as white men, or white women (obviously favoring Obama rather than Romney)?

I haven't seen any specific articles or news clips on that. Curious.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 14th 2012, 5:05:05

Eh, considering both of those ratings agencies are essentially backward-looking, let 'em fry.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 10th 2012, 5:50:31

Whiners always ruin the party.

We really don't put much effort into trading. If we did what whiner says repeatedly in every landtrading thread - to trade efficiently and effectively (the right way) - our networths would be much higher.

Quit yer fluffin' for once. :)

Mr Snow

Member
136

Nov 10th 2012, 5:44:00

Originally posted by locket:
Originally posted by Klown:
Originally posted by Trife:
Originally posted by Klown:
No it doesnt... as education improves, as does the tendency to vote Republican (post-grads excluded). Romney won college graduates.

Romney won the middle and upper class. He won those making 50k-99k and 100k and above. Obama won only those making less than 50k. Show me an educated person making less than 50k.



FYI, Those making 50k-99k are lower class. Romney said that middle class is 200-250k/year.

'Show me an educated person making less than 50k.'
Really? Prepare to be bombarded.



Please don't post to me about your loser Facebook friends that majored in English and are members of Occupy Wall St. I don't give a crap what Romney said about middle class. 50k-99k is middle class. Under 50k is lower class.

LOL perhaps you should look a bit closer Klown. You are ridiculous.

"About 1.5 million, or 53.6 percent, of bachelor's degree-holders under the age of 25 last year were jobless or underemployed, the highest share in at least 11 years. In 2000, the share was at a low of 41 percent, before the dot-com bust erased job gains for college graduates in the telecommunications and IT fields.

Out of the 1.5 million who languished in the job market, about half were underemployed, an increase from the previous year."


Also you may want to look at your link again dude lol.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...012-exit-polls/table.html

Romney won college grads by 4% but lost "some college" by 1% and "postgraduate studies" by 13%.


I'll skip the requisite insults and simply point out that by losing 'some college' he actually won (the 'dumb' people that couldn't finish school voted for obama), that 'college grads' likely includes all the postgraduate numbers, and even if it doesn't 'postgraduate studies' is a pretty small % of college graduates, sooooooo, still, winning overall among the 'educated', if that's how you frame it. Just sayin'.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Oct 6th 2012, 4:15:01

Originally posted by locket:
Nuk he isn't very good at this fluff waving thing so I'd just leave him be. It is better off ignored rather than laughed at for how inadequate it is.



Or, you could top the thread with an ironic post about ignoring him. I love your posts. :)

Mr Snow

Member
136

Oct 3rd 2012, 6:57:25

Originally posted by highrock:
Originally posted by Vic:
you have been fairly objective up until your last couple posts, my man.

point is. a lot of the original colors are still in rd. a lot of those original colors are people that you probably do indeed respect. not much more to say on the matter


well i don't know exactly who is there and what not, but the objective fact is that every single RD top finisher in EE has been given tons of free land via intra-clan farming. this can be checked pretty easily from eestats.

another fact is that no RD under the RD tag has finished at the top without the free land.

whether or not any of the actual current players have finished #1 without the help is something i do not know. i also do not know whether they are capable but just lazy, or completely incapable without help.

i only know the first three facts and from there i made my claims.


You should check your facts again. Or should I call you a liar now?

Mr Snow

Member
136

Sep 26th 2012, 5:38:44

Have fun in those other games, Drow. Personally, I think you're right.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Sep 9th 2012, 7:24:31

Head of IT, huh? So, he makes sure the people who design the cars and test them have email? Lol. Funny thing to brag about.

Btw, I love the G-wagon, but they're overpriced.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Aug 23rd 2012, 19:03:18

Originally posted by Hopeless:
Originally posted by TAN:
Originally posted by galleri:
You still provide no reason.....
Don't forget to factor in the following for you rankings...
1. no reason to war
2. you are a bigger clan than imag

Either way we like war. And don't forget in the future .... we don't forget. So when you are there all cute and cozy just netting away...don't forget to check behind your back. We are always there. Sorry your plan never worked out last set and we coddled you for it.


I don't understand why war alliances hold grudges. You guys want wars, then complain when someone wars you?


+10


+20

Maybe they'll get to complain this set that all their countries died before they could get a single kill. lol :P

Mr Snow

Member
136

Aug 22nd 2012, 6:18:54

Huh. The first post is eminently clear to me, though somewhat sarcastic. imag dies, so others don't have to worry about the roll of the dice as to who they're going to hit this reset.

Unless, of course, imag has proof of their theory? A convo, perhaps? Some logs? Or is it just speculation?

Either way, it's fun to watch imag whine while claiming the opposite.

Good luck in the war.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Aug 19th 2012, 5:42:24

Oh my. I can hardly believe any of you are serious about this discussion. Video games...in the olympics. Bwahaha.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Aug 10th 2012, 7:50:57

I understand why people want to reduce the number of swimming medals, but only to a point. Think about it compared to running. How many different track races are there? 100/200/400/800/1500/3k/5k/10k/marathon, and all the relays. There are marked differences in running vs swimming due mostly to the impact and weight carried, and ability to cool the body, but besides that, the muscles have to be able to act similarly. The Olympics could maybe do away with a few of the swimming distances, but not many. There are also different strokes in swimming, yet only one way to run. Possibly there will be skipping, or running backwards in 2016?

Think about it. Btw, snowboarding still seems so lame as an Olympic sport. And does Shaun White do anything but half-pipe? Slalom/boardercross/etc? There is more than one snowboard competition, you know. He doesn't win anything else, but he's marketable.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Aug 10th 2012, 7:42:27

I was going to type a big retort, once again demolishing your poor use of the English language, etc... but I'll refrain. You've been proven wrong enough. I don't understand what I'm saying, Mr. Dictionary? Lol. I'll concede I miffed one point there. No big deal. Time to run along and enjoy some more Olympics.

Btw, the Jamaicans were impressive in the 200, and other races. I'm afraid to mention the Americans...but I'm more impressed about what I saw from them today, so I can't help it. Sorry I brought them up. :)


I'm personally looking forward to the 5k, and the marathon. Wrestling is always good, though fairly uneventful as such a high level.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Aug 9th 2012, 6:52:39

Oh dear. You are on your own again, it seems.

1. Quote me anywhere where I said to stop criticizing the U.S. Liar. Unfortunately for you, that pretty much destroys your whole tantrum.
2. Once again, pointing out that China should be dominating, is not saying anything but that. There was no imaginary 'stop criticizing the U.S.' in there. You argue like a woman.
3. So, you admit you had the definition wrong, and therefore your accusation. Thanks.
4. Sorry that you think this thread is all about you. It's not. If I bring up something else, it's not because I'm sidestepping anything. I agree the nbc coverage sucks. I don't care if you whine and say the U.S. sucks. I pointed out a simple comparison of ratios of population and medals. No big deal. Take it and run with it, why don't you?

Anything positive happen lately for you? :)

Mr Snow

Member
136

Aug 8th 2012, 9:46:04

Both the men's and women's triathlons were really good races.

If anybody hasn't seen the men's 10,000 meter race, you should watch it. I've been told by numerous people that it was epic.

Mr Snow

Member
136

Aug 8th 2012, 9:42:50

You're joking right? I've responded to everything. I can't help it if you change the goalposts every time you're proven wrong. Just because you decide to continue a stupid line of arguing doesn't mean I have to follow. Grow up.

You lie in every post. I never said anything about nbc, until I said they sucked. Which was a response to another lie. Trollcheck: you must have cherrypicked your definition of jingoistic, or made it up. A simple google search shows you're not based in reality, again. And, if you think that's loudly or excessively, I recommend sensitivity training. I didn't think the nbc coverage was important...why comment on it? It was just a response to your whining.

Pretending I'm neutral? Making up your own reality again? Hah.

Chin up, buddy. :)