May 7th 2010, 0:21:04
What I like the most is the obvious flip flop.....
The first claim was that my attacks were NOT retals specifically BECAUSE "I didn't send a retal message". This was your stance, correct? Absolutely.
NOW you want to say that my attacks weren't retals because they came after a failed attack, and therefore could NOT BE retals.
So, just to be clear.....your story up until now is that I was retalled because i DIDN'T SEND A RETAL MESSAGE for the attacks that could have NEVER BEEN VALID RETALS............given your newfound stance.
Make it up as you go along. That way it is never wrong!
Edited By: wari on May 7th 2010, 0:22:01