That's good dave, because you, me and mob are having a 3some on msn, and having to refresh this every 2 mins really kills a hard on.

And I'm spent.

Me too...

all that 3some talk got me worked up ;)

Alright that tears it, you conduct bombing runs on my cities? How dare you sir!

i think you're including the countries already in our graveyard in these numbers, we had around 100 active countries all set. Not like it matters, we all wanted to net and have no desire to war, not like it ever would have been a fair fight.

Warring alliances of equal size hitting netting alliances is real lame. You didnt have a reason to hit. I am no great fan of sanct, but you could have tried to find a real target. You both could have warred eachother, called Sanct out, or warred a prepared alliance like IMP, focus, or KA.

The only thing this war did was eliminate some more cross-over players from FFA. Good job.

In regard to `picking on the retarded kid on the playground`, that would clearly be you for your choice in targets.

Saying that you expected them to do better with no warfare techs, no turns stored, and no expectation of war in their OPENING reset is marvelously stupid.

Way to prove that you are yellow-bellies.

no expectation of war?? they were killing 2 tags with a total of 1/5 their size. fluff them

and yes, we thought they would fight...not our fault they can dish it out but cant take it




remind me next time to kill your guy's country for 4 accidental nukes, instead of letting you put off the land reps til the next set.

like your "100" countries against 32 countries was fair?

and dont give me that "it was only a couple countries" bullfluff, because thats all you needed to hit with

pretty sure we didnt "declare war" on either of those two clans they came on here and "declared war" on ours admitting they would suicide would you not kill them?

you were already killing them before they declared

spin spin spin

no I wasnt' I didnt even play my countries til then..spin spin spin...I'm guessing you're pissed that SancT has no desire to fight back? Are you a sad puppy?

idgaf

as i said, we'll gladly kill for free

and i didnt say YOU did, when i say you i'm referring to Sanct as a whole

when a clan allows this behavior, the repercussions come on the whole clan

Is it really this common for clans to sit on a high horse and pretend they do nothing that could be seen as harming the game? I know SoL did it last set in alliance, now you're trying to do the same but just makes everyone look stupid. If FFA/Alliance tactics weren't hurting the game we'd still have wars of 1000+

cant have wars of 1000+ when there is a 16 country limit ENFORCED

plus EE doesnt have the membership base that the Swirve site did

theres a reason EE doesnt have teh same member base

lol. Awesome.

I knew you were an idiot just from your posts. But when I noticed your sig and it said "Death Knights" that pretty much summed it up for me.

I love you, too.

Kemo...

Dec 08/10 6:11:44 AM NM Not Afraid (#2613) (xTFx) 01100011 (#2220) (X) 261 A

Dec 08/10 3:40:20 AM SS 01100011 (#2220) (X) Haunted (#2621) (xTFx) 116 A (+107 A)
Dec 08/10 3:39:04 AM SS 01100011 (#2220) (X) Haunted (#2621) (xTFx) Defence Held

Dec 03/10 6:18:17 AM PS Forgotten (#2612) (xTFx) 01100101 (#2222) (X) 59 A (+36 A)
Dec 03/10 6:18:16 AM PS Forgotten (#2612) (xTFx) 01100101 (#2222) (X) 65 A (+38 A)
Dec 03/10 6:18:14 AM PS Forgotten (#2612) (xTFx) 01100101 (#2222) (X) 99 A (+69 A)
Dec 03/10 6:18:11 AM PS Forgotten (#2612) (xTFx) 01100101 (#2222) (X) 130 A (+83 A)
Dec 03/10 6:18:09 AM PS Forgotten (#2612) (xTFx) 01100101 (#2222) (X) 197 A (+99 A)

Dec 08/10 3:33:41 AM SS 01100010 (#2219) (X) End of All Hope (#2625) (xTFx) 239 A (+70 A)

Dec 08/10 3:26:03 AM SS 01100001 (#2218) (X) End of All Hope (#2625) (xTFx) 285 A (+115 A)

524 A Grabbed from Tag X on The Fallen
550 A Grabbed from The Fallen on Tag X

The country that i grabbed, has the least amount of defense


But, please... explain this below...


Dec 21/10 12:04:48 AM PS fook this (#207) (SancTFFA) 01100010 (#2219) (X) Defence Held

Dec 21/10 12:05:20 AM PS fook this (#207) (SancTFFA) 01100001 (#2218) (X) 230 A (+286 A)

Dec 20/10 11:28:57 PM SS Netting (#2562) (SancTFFA) 01100001 (#2218) (X) 178 A (+285 A)
Dec 20/10 11:28:54 PM SS Netting (#2562) (SancTFFA) 01100001 (#2218) (X) 184 A (+292 A)

Dec 13/10 9:54:01 PM PS Mighty (#2559) (SancTFFA) 01100010 (#2219) (X) 322 A (+460 A)
Dec 13/10 9:53:50 PM PS Mighty (#2559) (SancTFFA) 01100010 (#2219) (X) 342 A (+481 A)

Dec 11/10 10:39:08 PM SS 01100010 (#2219) (X) how i met your mother (#2419) (SancTFFA) 223 A (+134 A)
Dec 11/10 10:38:21 PM SS 01100010 (#2219) (X) how i met your mother (#2419) (SancTFFA) 234 A (+140 A)

Dec 11/10 7:23:56 PM SS Brutal Anitpathy (#1950) (SancTFFA) 01100010 (#2219) (X) 249 A (+264 A)
Dec 11/10 7:23:51 PM SS Brutal Anitpathy (#1950) (SancTFFA) 01100010 (#2219) (X) 264 A (+272 A)

CrazyDave: I guess what I am saying is, the double team really took any glory out of killing sanct.

dude we a bigger tag. more hits are obviously gonna come from us. dave was arguing i double tapped you for no reason. so my question that was never even answered was why did you 5 tap x for no reason? least amount of defense is no excuse.

also look at how spread out sancts hits on x are. youll notice not more then 2 are within 24hr on him. but i guess that dont matter? i dont know bout you guys but in most countries 5 is just a bit more then 2...

i mean fluff x even retaled, i know youll love this part :P, WITH SS!!!!!

do you check your own news?

i see a double tap, and then another sanct country hit the same one that was double tapped an hour later

do i need to go searching for it again

anyways, i'm done arguing the reasons

BSS wanted to kill you for punking TF, Swords just wanted to kill you so we recruited them to make it even numbers

we had no clue that half of you would tag jump and the other half would quit/cry


P.S. i hope you saying that you're coming after us next set isn't just a tease :D

paging dave the retard

your still not commenting on his 5 tap buddy.
your still not commenting on his 5 tap buddy.
your still not commenting on his 5 tap buddy.
your still not commenting on his 5 tap buddy.
your still not commenting on his 5 tap buddy.

maybe if i put that 5 times itll work? youve yet to explain how its ok for him to 5 tap but sanct cant double tap. ill try to make this a little simpler for you :P

1
2-youll note the 2 is just after the 1 and not near the 5
3-also see how the 3 is not after the 5?
4

please pay attention for this part cause clearly i keep losin you here

5-this one in most languages is between the 4 and 6. now thats 3 above the 2 but only 2 above the 3. thus 5 is the greater number

idgaf about his 5 tap

i was just pointing out that you lie, just like kwxmi or whatever his name is when he claimed BSS were farming his untags the last few days before the dec.

you guys lie and make up excuses to try to make us look bad and you guys look good.... i'll admit maybe we shouldn't of recruited swords to help us. but when you tucked your tails between your legs against just us you'd be laughed off the server even harder than you are now. at least this saved you guys some face

would we do it again if we had the chance? you bet your ass

i just wish i would of listened to Swords when they said not to mention defending TF and just left it as because we wanted to...

just like your excuses, TF was MY excuse

i drop that now, its because we wanted to...and it looks like we picked the right fluffes


PLS SUM WAR NEXT SET!!!!

your probly should care about the 5 tap considerin it goes entirely against your argument buddy

i guess thanks for admitting swords wants you to lie even though your saying sanct isnt allowed to :P

lie?

no

they didnt want the drama that they obviously knew you drama queens would give

do you need help with reading? we wanted to war, and i used TF as an EXCUSE!! you know what an excuse is right? i mean thats all you guys having been throwing out there

not admitting the "truth" is slightly different than completely making fluff up that can and has been disproven

how is coverin the truth not lying? wtf? if your not admitting then your essentially leaving out evidence and is in fact a bad thing. your incredible with your logic

if you dont say something, its not lying

like if i dont tell you that i think you and Sanct are a bunch of crybaby pussies, does that mean i'm lying?

you guys have tried straight out making fluff up.... thats a whole different ballgame


anyways, arguing on the internet is like competing in the Special Olympics, even if you win you're still retarded

and i'm now done being retarded :D

Swords did not tell them to lie about anything.


When I was asked how we wanted to post the DOW I simply said to post "BSS + Swords declares war on.... SancTFFA, because we wanted to"


You can look at Swords news, we are guilty of farming untagged countrys and 1 man tags. Although that is mostly due to our own policys not being put in place at the moment. Never once did we ever say this had anything to do with it.


As I have stated many many many times, Swords just wanted to kill something. Since we are pacted with BSS, they were not a target. Who else did that leave? ARES? They were a little smaller than us, but they have not been in our news at all this set. SancTFFA? They were double our size and countrys, they were in our news alot before the FS, and BSS wanted to hit SancTFFA anyways. Everything added up to killing SancTFFA.


and FYI Sanct, if we wouldn't have killed you, someone else was going too this set. We just beat them to the punch.