Verified:

cRaZyDaVe Game profile

Member
1487

Aug 26th 2012, 22:01:04

i havent played in quite some time, but i could of swore you weren't allowed to do SS retals for L:L


am i mistaken?
Originally posted by Twain:
I love the idea of sending even 100 troops into an area so they can go assassinate citizens one at a time.

cRaZyDaVe Game profile

Member
1487

Aug 26th 2012, 22:45:22

really?

no replies at all?

Originally posted by Twain:
I love the idea of sending even 100 troops into an area so they can go assassinate citizens one at a time.

H4xOr WaNgEr Game profile

Forum Moderator
1983

Aug 26th 2012, 22:45:54

you are not mistaken.

Unless it is the last hit or the only hit.

trumper Game profile

Member
1559

Aug 26th 2012, 22:49:55

If it's the second then yes (in which they're being nice to you as some folks are), but not the first hit.

Requiem

Member
EE Patron
9674

Aug 26th 2012, 22:50:05

By PDM's policy you could SS if all your hits were SS, we don't allow mixing of attack types.
Someone ask Qz / Pang to remove my 10 year ban!

Hopeless Game profile

Member
501

Aug 26th 2012, 22:52:44

some alliance will mix match ps and ss until they get their land back

cRaZyDaVe Game profile

Member
1487

Aug 26th 2012, 23:34:29

ok thanks guys
Originally posted by Twain:
I love the idea of sending even 100 troops into an area so they can go assassinate citizens one at a time.

archaic Game profile

Member
7023

Aug 27th 2012, 1:44:13

You can do whatever kind of retal your alliance can enforce, same as it ever was.
Cheating Mod Hall of Shame: Dark Morbid, Turtle Crawler, Sov

CrazyMatt Game profile

Member
265

Aug 27th 2012, 2:10:40

your gay

locket Game profile

Member
6176

Aug 27th 2012, 3:41:29

Dave, if you do SS to get in an extra hit then most people will strongly object to that.

TAN Game profile

Member
3527

Aug 27th 2012, 7:38:00

Originally posted by Requiem:
By PDM's policy you could SS if all your hits were SS, we don't allow mixing of attack types.


Unfortunately, that's how it reads, but I don't think that was the intention. We'll need to reword it. If you want your final attack to be an SS after doing PS, it's fine - but our policy doesn't make it explicit, so it'll need to be changed.
FREEEEEDOM!!!

Duna Game profile

Member
787

Aug 27th 2012, 7:58:57

Well, as i see it - you can do ss or ps in any way to get exactly 100% land. If you get 50% land with ss, then do 2 SSes, instead of 1 PS (or 2 PS).
Dont be evil and ppl will like you:)

davidoss Game profile

Member
643

Aug 27th 2012, 10:41:03

bonus

AzNiZe Game profile

Member
358

Aug 27th 2012, 11:35:59

people will appreciate you better if you don't RoR during their retals ;)

SirSepher Game profile

Member
196

Aug 27th 2012, 12:57:49

I've already done a PS followed by an SS this set for retals... I'm not a super greedy fella. But an SS followed by a PS is a no-no.
-Sir Sepher
Old Fogey learning to play again
PDM FTW
For the glory of Camelot

Kid Game profile

Member
282

Aug 27th 2012, 13:58:31

well for most case, i see ppl getting 150% land. cause they do SS to get below 80% land to get another valid retal and then do PS on second.

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Aug 27th 2012, 15:55:36

So why don't people just put in another pact term that says if a L:L retal results in more than 120% (unless it is the only retal hit, or if the retal is a SS that brought it from less than 80% to over 120%) then it will be considered over-retalling?

Nekked Game profile

Member
885

Aug 27th 2012, 16:17:27

?

grimjoww Game profile

Member
961

Aug 27th 2012, 16:51:42

NUKE RETALs L:L

Requiem

Member
EE Patron
9674

Aug 27th 2012, 16:53:12

Originally posted by Xinhuan:
So why don't people just put in another pact term that says if a L:L retal results in more than 120% (unless it is the only retal hit, or if the retal is a SS that brought it from less than 80% to over 120%) then it will be considered over-retalling?


For the most part most alliances have been pretty level headed about it to be honest. If people try to take advantage then I think something of the sort might start appearing.
Someone ask Qz / Pang to remove my 10 year ban!

Rockman Game profile

Member
3388

Aug 27th 2012, 17:17:50

Originally posted by Xinhuan:
So why don't people just put in another pact term that says if a L:L retal results in more than 120% (unless it is the only retal hit, or if the retal is a SS that brought it from less than 80% to over 120%) then it will be considered over-retalling?


Or people could just not hit alliances that can retal them.

1:1 or L:L is moot if the alliance can't break you.

Requiem

Member
EE Patron
9674

Aug 27th 2012, 17:43:19

Originally posted by Rockman:
Originally posted by Xinhuan:
So why don't people just put in another pact term that says if a L:L retal results in more than 120% (unless it is the only retal hit, or if the retal is a SS that brought it from less than 80% to over 120%) then it will be considered over-retalling?


Or people could just not hit alliances that can retal them.

1:1 or L:L is moot if the alliance can't break you.


Bottom feeding in this game is done. And if you go around grabbing people with 10 million turrets you're going to make a lot of people mad at you and overall you will probably get into some trouble eventually in the set. It is far easier to be smart when grabbing knowing that after you get retaled you still gain land.

People who grab then jump in NW with all turrets tend to cause problems.
Someone ask Qz / Pang to remove my 10 year ban!

Rockman Game profile

Member
3388

Aug 27th 2012, 17:45:55

Originally posted by Requiem:
Originally posted by Rockman:
Originally posted by Xinhuan:
So why don't people just put in another pact term that says if a L:L retal results in more than 120% (unless it is the only retal hit, or if the retal is a SS that brought it from less than 80% to over 120%) then it will be considered over-retalling?


Or people could just not hit alliances that can retal them.

1:1 or L:L is moot if the alliance can't break you.


Bottom feeding in this game is done. And if you go around grabbing people with 10 million turrets you're going to make a lot of people mad at you and overall you will probably get into some trouble eventually in the set. It is far easier to be smart when grabbing knowing that after you get retaled you still gain land.

People who grab then jump in NW with all turrets tend to cause problems.


And thats why LaF used to make so many enemies :)

You gain a lot more land if you don't get retalled than if you do get retalled.

Requiem

Member
EE Patron
9674

Aug 27th 2012, 17:52:25

Yeah that is totally true just kind of hard to do it without making the enemies :p

But then again i guess if you can take on the enemies and still win and after you tag kill them continue to net it might work out. Seems like a more risky game plan though.
Someone ask Qz / Pang to remove my 10 year ban!

UltraMarines Game profile

Member
343

Aug 27th 2012, 18:23:04

its all fun and games till someone grabs and jumps nw to avoid the retal

BILL_DANGER Game profile

Member
524

Aug 27th 2012, 19:36:37

THE LEVEL OF PROTOCOL, CIVILITY AND MANNERS APPLIED TO A MOST DEFINITELY UNCIVIL AND UNQUESTIONABLY RUDE BEHAVIOR (THE TAKING OF LANDS BY FORCE FROM ANOTHER SOVEREIGN NATION) MAKES MY HEAD SPIN, MY EYES ROLL, MY TOES CURL, AND MY STOMACH ACHE!! WELL OK THAT LAST ONE MAY BE THE VOLCANO NACHOS..

THE MIGHTY CLAN [DANGER]! WAS FORCED TO MAKE AN EXAMPLE OF LAF THIS RESET. HOPEFULLY OTHERS WILL NOT BE SO FOOLISH AS TO COVET THE GREEN PASTURES OF OUR LANDS IN THE FUTURE!

BILL
MINISTER OF PROPAGANDA
THE MIGHTY CLAN [DANGER]!

cRaZyDaVe Game profile

Member
1487

Aug 27th 2012, 22:15:17

Originally posted by AzNiZe:
people will appreciate you better if you don't RoR during their retals ;)


lol

its not a RoR when he takes 2 SS retals for L:L and still would of been owed 1k acres

Edited By: cRaZyDaVe on Aug 27th 2012, 22:23:40
See Original Post
Originally posted by Twain:
I love the idea of sending even 100 troops into an area so they can go assassinate citizens one at a time.

bstrong86 Game profile

Member
2482

Aug 27th 2012, 22:28:34

AZN- since u didnt heed the warning of no more SS for L:L,

DK will be taking 250% for each of these

8/27/2012 16:16:47 Walls Of Stalingrad (#150) Neofed War Inside My Head (#141) DkNights SS 308 Acres / + 128 Acres
8/27/2012 16:14:57 Walls Of Stalingrad (#150) Neofed War Inside My Head (#141) DkNights SS 363 Acres / + 261 Acres
8/27/2012 16:13:26 Walls Of Stalingrad (#150) Neofed War Inside My Head (#141) DkNights SS 353 Acres / + 334 Acres
8/27/2012 16:12:44 Walls Of Stalingrad (#150) Neofed War Inside My Head (#141) DkNights SS 371 Acres / + 341 Acr

have a swell day
The Death Knights

XI