EE Poll!!!!!!!!!!!! - Earth Empires Forum

King_Cobra1

Member
1019

Nov 16th 2015, 21:06:28

Should Stones be considered a spam tag or not?

VOTE NOW!

King_Cobra1

Member
1019

Nov 16th 2015, 21:08:47

Important things to remember

1. They are losing to a bunch of blindsided netters.
2. They did a missile FS against a bunch of netters instead of a normal FS.
3. They have a little bit of activity (but, so, did imag...)
4. They create as much FA drama as Imag.
5. There country builds are a C grade at best.

Sov

Member
2509

Nov 16th 2015, 21:09:34

No. Just because they might not be as skilled as others does not make them a spam tag. A spam tag is where the tag is spammed out to anyone and there is no internal coordination. They are coordinated they are just lacking in terms of skill.

mdevol

Member
3239

Nov 16th 2015, 21:19:54

Originally posted by Sov:

Surely what a man does when he is caught off his guard is the best evidence as to what sort of man he is. - C.S. Lewis

Forgotten

Member
1605

Nov 16th 2015, 21:24:21

Should King_Cobra be considered a real person?

~LaF's Retired Janitor~

mrcuban

Member
1103

Nov 16th 2015, 21:24:48

I don't see any point to this post. Take away stones, imag and you have a boring server ATM.

King_Cobra1

Member
1019

Nov 16th 2015, 21:33:50

True but, don't see any tags that just pass out password much anymore. So, maybe the definition needs redefining. :)

The point of this thread is trolling mrcuban..

Depends who you ask forgotten.

Heston

Member
4766

Nov 16th 2015, 23:37:40

No. Weezy hates the ewpp. Making stones the only real tag. 😳

❤️️Nothing but❤️️💯❤️️❤️️🌺🌸🌹❤️❤️💯

King_Cobra1

Member
1019

Nov 16th 2015, 23:40:09

Ok so, there is one valid point for Heston!

EWPP is gay and outdated. Its time for its demolish and let the free flow of earth empires politics commence.

DruncK

Member
2134

Nov 17th 2015, 0:44:17

Holy fluff, KC and I agree on something?!? I call shenanigans!

DruncK

Member
2134

Nov 17th 2015, 0:44:44

Has the eewp even been tested yet?

BladeEWG

Member
2191

Nov 17th 2015, 0:45:37

Stones has never been a spam tag and how long did I complain about the eewp when I was there?
Glad they're still against it

iTarl

Member
879

Nov 17th 2015, 0:52:50

SAM_DANGER

Member
1236

Nov 17th 2015, 2:42:39

Originally posted by DruncK:

Has the eewp even been tested yet?

Yes, during its very first reset.

Not a big test, but a test nonetheless. Maybe like an open book quiz.

hsifreta

Member
1797

Nov 17th 2015, 3:16:08

Originally posted by mdevol:

Originally posted by Sov:

Colo

Member
1037

Nov 17th 2015, 6:36:18

Yes, stones are total nubs.

zygotic

Member
340

Nov 17th 2015, 7:28:41

I would class them as a clan not an alliance

Sov

Member
2509

Nov 17th 2015, 12:54:13

When you consider that Stones is bigger than more established alliances such as Omega, ICN, Monsters, LCN, etc then they are doing something right.

I don't agree with their policies or their tactics to provoke war. They have tested my patience on several occasions this set.

Despite all their weaknesses and flaws they do have potential but they need to get their act together. If they had someone who had excellent knowledge of current warring tactics and country strategies they could become a very threatening Alliance.

zygotic

Member
340

Nov 17th 2015, 15:29:37

I agree they have the size but currently lack political skill. Until they learnt how to handle themselves politically then they will be seen as a bunch of unorganized kids. They need to focus on what they want from their alliance. Do you want to be a warring alliance or a netgaining alliance? Jumping a weakened netgaining alliance (i only say weakened because some of the usual EVO members are in another tag fighting a prearranged war) to get the war they wanted isn't going to win any friends.