Jun 13th 2022, 22:17:13
You know that whole griefing thing was true and it took a senior mod to come in and handle your business. If semantics is the problem, as it was the primary argument used by SF, then use a different word. Playing the game with the specific goal from turn 1 to ruin the country and gaming experience of any player on a server is what griefing is all about. Use 'player abuse' if you need terminology clarification. SF, among others, stated with glee and pride, that they would trash with 10+ land grabs ('teach a lesson') to what they personally determined was a player whose country did not possess "adequate" turrets (low D n00bs). The argument was that land grabs, no matter how many, does not violate rules, which is true. But player abuse is against the rules. Or is your opinion, as a moderator, that abusing multiple players, ruining their sets, blackmail (buy 2 million turrets, or else!!) and mockery not considered abusive? It sure does seem like player abuse. You still seem upset at the outcome but had no problem with applying sanctions. The sanctions which are used to prevent problem players from abusing others. So there was no disagreement that sanctions applied, just that 'griefing' is a no-no word. Sort of like "trolling" is the word you apply to me when I address grievance's towards suspect moderation, or lack thereof.
You made a claim that ratski and maj1 are the same player. Ratski. Spends how much time getting mocked? But secretly he builds countries worth $20 million+ networth? I was calling you out for slander, because it's the exact same thing you and gal did to me for weeks, while tossing accusations that I was Severus, just couldn't admit you fluffed up. Bleating on about browsers, asking around for proof while I sat purpled on all servers. Until a pm and sorry-not-sorry, you can play again. Words can be confusing and obfuscate is one of them.
Edited By: g0nz0 on Jun 13th 2022, 22:21:43